The media isn't covering it bc A. it seems flimsy and B. bc she's anonymous. After the Rolling Stone fiasco with the false rape story than ran...no one is going to report on a story with an unknown person.
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
Hampton university poll has him +3. Others have her ahead
I'm convinced not a single poll has a damn clue with this weird ass election. He could pull a Reagan or he could pull a carter.
Speaking of polls. Has anyone here ever been polled? No, not that kind copkilla, the kind where you tell who you're voting for.
Last edited:
One in four government workers say they will consider quitting if Trump elected. Lol
Lib/dims....ya gotta love em.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...they-will-consider-quitting-if-trump-elected/
Lib/dims....ya gotta love em.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...they-will-consider-quitting-if-trump-elected/
Good. I'm sure a lot of people would love a government job and government benefits and a government attitude
I was once when I lived in NC like 10 years ago, can't remember if it was presidential cycle (maybe 04) or not but they asked like ten minutes worth of bs questions before finally asking me who i was voting for.
![[roll]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/roll.r191677.gif "roll [roll]")
You saying we can get rid of lazy ass government employees and retarded celebrities and destroy the media in one swoop?
Trump would immediately be my favorite president ever.
Well definitely a plus. who isn't for smaller government
bullshit. Give up a puss run Gov't job for a private sector spot that pays less and demands actual results? Nope.
I used to get polled on radio stations/content ALL the time... back when folks listened to radio... and had landlines.
Gloria Allred is supposed to bring her out.
Gloria Allred is a character assassin. I don't know why the media hypes her up like shes someone.
Is America today really too ignorant for Podesta's Hitler line of attack?
Maybe people just don't know who Hitler was, so calling someone a child rapist is more impactful.
That's apparently the tactic with Trump and Assange.
Maybe people just don't know who Hitler was, so calling someone a child rapist is more impactful.
That's apparently the tactic with Trump and Assange.
Thats what the left does. When someone threatens the left they are charged as rapists because the left knows at least some people will believe it.
The left are sick bastards.
The left are sick bastards.
When will jamo grow the balls to admit he's with her?
Breaking news per Bret baier:
FBI has been investigating Clinton foundation for pay to play between it and Hillary Clinton for over a year.
No laptops have been destroyed
All immunity deals are null and void if they lied
FBI has been investigating Clinton foundation for pay to play between it and Hillary Clinton for over a year.
No laptops have been destroyed
All immunity deals are null and void if they lied
Because if you are voting for "Her", she already has your balls in a jar. And they won't grow back eunuch to regain your masculinity.
Something tells me the FBI is a tad pissed off. But I've been wrong before....
No. Term. President.
No. Term. President.
Zero doubt about that now.
A week ago I thought we were going to get sandbagged and Comey would 100% clear her by Monday.....nope. They're pissed from top to bottom.
If she's a Jane doe, how do people know who to threaten?
Sorry but shear long investigation should be enough to at least charge something. If she's elected the investigation doesn't matter. It's over
He's with her. He recently blamed the French for the issues with Islam in France. He claims to be a cuck (RINO) but no RINO cuck would ever say something like that. That's straight from the Slate playbook; that's as SJW as it gets. He's with her alright.
Thats what I'm saying lol. How does one threaten a nameless person?
Just spitballing, but there's a few ways. 1) her lawyer is known, so threats are sent to the lawyer. 2) her name is available via sealed court documents and it leaked. 3) if the story is true (or at least some parts are, like presence at events), it's possible that someone (familiar with the events in question) could deduce the identity.
Would we not, in turn, then know who made the threats and make arrests and post mug shots as examples of deplorables? I'd assume team Hill would be all about that.
What do you think the success rate is in tracking down (presumably) anonymous threats? My guess is it's pretty low (and a low priority generally), but maybe that crack team of detectives from The Big Lebowski is on it.
But if they are known? Sure.
FBI 99% sure at least 5 foreign parties hacked the Clinton server. Per Fox
Don't know. Probably as good as the odds are that a few of the "many" being made were made digitally.
Brexit style fear mongering from Obama.
http://www.businessinsider.com/obama-donald-trump-north-carolina-2016-11
http://www.businessinsider.com/obama-donald-trump-north-carolina-2016-11
How anyone buys his BS anymore is beyond comprehension
Similar threads
