Yes, you see this with posters like Albany on here. It is nation wide from government to civilian workers. Look at the schools like UL and UNC. Money drives the train and this train is wide open. When it derails guys like Albany, JohnKBA, and Jameslee32 will blame it on all the old white men in this nation and still try to feed the flames of malcontent but, it will be too late for them and their legions of followers as they will have no funding left to keep them going.
You could be right. The perfect storm. Women that can deal with a hand-friendly Donald but not the dirty politics coming from the left. Not sure that works with Hispanic women though.
Smart money hasn't bet yet. It is still letting the suckers get lulled in by the spread.
You really don't know? I don't know, just seems obvious it goes higher up than her. If she goes down, so does he.
More individual bets have been placed on Trump; more billionaire bets on Clinton.
Something tells me that this Sorosite has selected a group of close Brexit polls to be compared with a group of polls that have a plus 29 D sample. Your side will be better served to stop talking about how easily she is going to win, and start concentrating on presenting an argument as to WHY she deserves to win. Of course, the latter is all but an impossible task. Hence, the psyops- which won't work, as it will only serve to further mobilize the opposition to vote.
I don't trust polls either but if it's double-digits a week from now, then it might be noteworthy. Either way, I'm hoping for a 1-term presidency. But this campaign season surely has soured more worthy candidates for 2020.
I have never sang its praises and said from the very beginning that it was designed to fail so that it would lead to a single payer system. The design of Obamacare was to get millions of people insured and thus politically difficult to later take that access to insurance away.
There is a pretty good list of billionaires who have said that they should pay more taxes...including Trump.
I am 100% confident that 100% of the people** complaining about the oversampling comment in that email don't even know what oversampling means....or they're just trying to rile up those people who don't know what it means.
I supported it for economic reasons. It was a republican idea originally. When others aren't paying into a system, yet use it, that creates a burden for those paying. Pretty simple really.
