LOL at still starting Chris Livingston over Reeves. I guess he loves slow starts for the 4th game in a row.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Cal doesn't play Reeves? I have more issue with Wheeler getting ninutesLOL at still starting Chris Livingston over Reeves. I guess he loves slow starts for the 4th game in a row.
It matters who finishedReeves could score 50 tonight and he still wouldn’t start. Cal’s such a jackass
WrongI agree Cal is so hard headed - Livingston is not a 3
He doesn’t start Reeves. He doesn’t start our best lineup. It’s just dumb and something a clown like Billy Gillispie would do. It’s like when he started Kahlil Whitney over Immanuel Quickley, it’s just dumb and pointless. Setting the tone and getting off to a good start is important.Cal doesn't play Reeves? I have more issue with Wheeler getting ninutes
OK, this lineup not working last 3 gamesHe doesn’t start Reeves. He doesn’t start our best lineup. It’s just dumb and something a clown like Billy Gillispie would do. It’s like when he started Kahlil Whitney over Immanuel Quickley, it’s just dumb and pointless. Setting the tone and getting off to a good start is important.
He's living in 1990Why does he insist on playing a 4 at the 3? It's just idiotic.
Who cares who starts? And they didn’t have a slow start.LOL at still starting Chris Livingston over Reeves. I guess he loves slow starts for the 4th game in a row.
They got off to a nice start on the offensive end. Why are you still bitching?He doesn’t start Reeves. He doesn’t start our best lineup. It’s just dumb and something a clown like Billy Gillispie would do. It’s like when he started Kahlil Whitney over Immanuel Quickley, it’s just dumb and pointless. Setting the tone and getting off to a good start is important.
Do you Cal defenders have a loyalty card at U-Haul from moving the goalposts. Now the starting lineup doesn’t matter? Dafauq?!?Who cares who starts? And they didn’t have a slow start.
But but but he’s prepping him for the NBA draft. The greatest night in the history of UK basketball. 😉I agree Cal is so hard headed - Livingston is not a 3
Whether I like Cal or not, the Reeves not starting whining is just stupid.Do you Cal defenders have a loyalty card at U-Haul from moving the goalposts. Now the starting lineup doesn’t matter? Dafauq?!?
Seriously…..How about the slow starts every game. Start in a hole and give the other team confidence.He’s effective off the bench and plays over 25 minute so who cares?
Livingston doesn’t give us much. He’s still learning, though. I don’t see him going pro next season.I agree Cal is so hard headed - Livingston is not a 3
Said on the pregame that Livingston doesn't want to play the 4.I agree Cal is so hard headed - Livingston is not a 3
You like the play he drew up to close the half? Bunch of crybabies on here.Can Cal just go away? So tired of him.
My thoughts are, you’re playing a undermanned Vandy team you should beat no problem. You have your main group set and now you need to find that most effective second group and you’ve gotta figure out how to use Wheeler in that second group. This game seems like one of the few we have left where you’ve got such an advantage you can afford to experiment.Most coaches want to play their best unit, together, every possible second of every game. And, the “Benny” group is not only our best 5, by FAR. But, it was the most efficient lineup, in the country, on both ends of the floor. It was the most efficient lineup that ANY team has put on the floor in the last 3 years. It might not matter in the end, tonight. But, I’ll never understand why our coach seems to go out of his way to not employ this strategy, groundbreaking as it is. Other than just to be a stubborn, petty jerk.
Bravo. Someone bringing some common sense into this threadMy thoughts are, you’re playing a undermanned Vandy team you should beat no problem. You have your main group set and now you need to find that most effective second group and you’ve gotta figure out how to use Wheeler in that second group. This game seems like one of the few we have left where you’ve got such an advantage you can afford to experiment.
No idea if that’s what Cal is doing but I’d be doing something similar. Seemed like he gave the experiments til about the 5 min mark where we started to pull away again.
They scored 4 points in 5 minutes. How is that a nice start? I’m bitching because not starting your best lineup and playing them as much as possible is stupid and I want to win.They got off to a nice start on the offensive end. Why are you still bitching?
We should have beat South Carolina no problem too. In what world does not playing your best lineup as much as possible make sense? No matter the nonsense, we have fans who will defend it. Y’all prolly defended Mark Coury and Khalil Whitney starting over much better players too.My thoughts are, you’re playing a undermanned Vandy team you should beat no problem. You have your main group set and now you need to find that most effective second group and you’ve gotta figure out how to use Wheeler in that second group. This game seems like one of the few we have left where you’ve got such an advantage you can afford to experiment.
No idea if that’s what Cal is doing but I’d be doing something similar. Seemed like he gave the experiments til about the 5 min mark where we started to pull away again.
Gotta find something to whine about? No, it’s a legit concern when your coach does something as goofy as not playing your best lineup. Gotta continuously make excuses for the indefensible.Bout to win 4 in a row, gotta find something to whine about I guess.
Who’s defending anything? I just gave my perspective.We should have beat South Carolina no problem too. In what world does not playing your best lineup as much as possible make sense? No matter the nonsense, we have fans who will defend it. Y’all prolly defended Mark Coury and Khalil Whitney starting over much better players too.
Where did I say anything about not substituting? I said you play your best lineup as much as possible, that’s why you start them. Also getting off to the best start possible is important too and a time setter. We’ve gotten off to slow starts every game he’s started during this streakWho’s defending anything? I just gave my perspective.
The world where it doesn’t make sense to play your best players together the most you possibly can is simply because they can’t play all game. If you never had to sub sure but that’s not basketball. Since we have to sub we would prefer the sub units to be productive, so it’s not unreasonable to try and find that group. Adjusting the starting line up changes the length specific groups will play together and now you may have groups that haven’t played much together.
Do you remember the Kansas state sweet 16 game?He’s effective off the bench and plays over 25 minute so who cares?
And sadly they aren't working out. We have to change this. Double digits wins aren't enoughWhere did I say anything about not substituting? I said you play your best lineup as much as possible, that’s why you start them. Also getting off to the best start possible is important too and a time setter. We’ve gotten off to slow starts every game he’s started during this streak