Coyotes have access to all manner of weaponry thanks to BIG ACME, so I get it.
All you need to control the population is an over-sized cannon, huge cliff, or anvil.Coyotes have access to all manner of weaponry thanks to BIG ACME, so I get it.
With all due respect none of those other luxury items have the ability to injure/kill 60 people in under a minute.
Semi auto handguns. Where do rich white people stand on those? You should never need more than say...6 shots? 10 at the absolute most?
nope, sorry. It, along with any other complicated issue, is a binary all or nothing choice.Best way to solve a tough problem is pretend you want to do something of substance about it but throw up your hands in mock frustration and use lazy arguments about how it’s impossible. These kind of people don’t actually want a solution if the compromise to get it done negatively effects them personally, even in the slightest.
———
You can say if they don’t have guns they’ll use something else...okay, use something else. Guns are the absolute easiest way to murder dozens of people in a hurry. Maybe make it a little tougher on the people who are going to “do it anyway.”
Yes, gun violence in Chicago is awful. But it’s not a legitimate argument for having no gun control. A lot of those weapons are brought in from neighboring states with weak laws.
It’s not a coincidence that we have the highest amount of random mass murders and we also live in the easiest place in the world to get guns.
On the flip side, no one should be talking about taking every single gun away. Being able to own a gun is part of who we are as a country, and it’s not a legitimate strategy to ban them all and take them away.
But to act like some legitimate measures won’t at least improve the problem is lazy and stupid. Both sides must compromise more than they want to on this issue or it will absolutely never get solved. And being that the current state of this country is “if you believe the opposite of me you’re a dipshit loser racist/commie” I don’t hold out much hope for a resolution, or even a curbing of the problem.
The LEFT is going to have to allow people to keep some guns in some manner, and the RIGHT is going to have to recognize this is an improvable problem and they might get inconvenienced a bit and not be able to have everything they want.
Fixing a tough problem is going to make both opposing sides upset at how the deal worked out for them. No one will be happy, and then we’ll know we’ve at least made a step in the right direction.
I don't disagree one bit Anth. I have family in Dayton and a cousin who was near the shooting area just an hour before it happened. Now more than ever I'm more open to laws and procedures changing, but not the line in the sand that a law abiding citizen who is deemed sane can't purchase a certain firearm when there are already an estimated 15,000,000 of (AR-15) in citizens hands in the United States today. I'm not sure where it ends. Is it just guns that look like ARs? There are semi automatic Glock handguns that you can have a 30 round magazine for and 18 round 12 gauge shotguns. Those aren't ARs but could be dangerous in the wrong persons hands. I just don't see how the government will be able to ban one type of gun without banning all of them.
Regardless, I was once as big of a diehard as any NRA member but now admit that stuff has to change.
shut up bitchBest way to solve a tough problem is pretend you want to do something of substance about it but throw up your hands in mock frustration and use lazy arguments about how it’s impossible. These kind of people don’t actually want a solution if the compromise to get it done negatively effects them personally, even in the slightest.
———
You can say if they don’t have guns they’ll use something else...okay, use something else. Guns are the absolute easiest way to murder dozens of people in a hurry. Maybe make it a little tougher on the people who are going to “do it anyway.”
Yes, gun violence in Chicago is awful. But it’s not a legitimate argument for having no gun control. A lot of those weapons are brought in from neighboring states with weak laws.
It’s not a coincidence that we have the highest amount of random mass murders and we also live in the easiest place in the world to get guns.
On the flip side, no one should be talking about taking every single gun away. Being able to own a gun is part of who we are as a country, and it’s not a legitimate strategy to ban them all and take them away.
But to act like some legitimate measures won’t at least improve the problem is lazy and stupid. Both sides must compromise more than they want to on this issue or it will absolutely never get solved. And being that the current state of this country is “if you believe the opposite of me you’re a dipshit loser racist/commie” I don’t hold out much hope for a resolution, or even a curbing of the problem.
The LEFT is going to have to allow people to keep some guns in some manner, and the RIGHT is going to have to recognize this is an improvable problem and they might get inconvenienced a bit and not be able to have everything they want.
Fixing a tough problem is going to make both opposing sides upset at how the deal worked out for them. No one will be happy, and then we’ll know we’ve at least made a step in the right direction.
The coyotes?We all know whose hands the blood will be on when Huber's subdivision is under siege and he doesn't have his AR-15 to protect himself AND his family.
Yes, gun violence in Chicago is awful. But it’s not a legitimate argument for having no gun control. A lot of those weapons are brought in from neighboring states with weak laws.
Jon Voight outlived a surprising number of people in this picture.I assumed Huber was referring to these coyotes
![]()
It’s not a coincidence that we have the highest amount of random mass murders.
Now if we can just get them to realize profiting off the media glorification of these issues is just as big of a problem as the weapons.The left isn’t trying to take everyone’s guns. That’s a dumbass strawman. The gun issue falls on one side. Nobody GAF about your hunting rifle or keeping a handgun for protection.
Was up to 25 cans at the apex, now about 6 cans of pouches a week.
I switched to Cope pouches to help me ween off. Feel like a big puss but it’s cutting down my habit quite a bit. Was up to 25 cans at the apex, now about 6 cans of pouches a week.
Like to cut that in half over the next month and be completely done by Fall.
Hard habit to kick