It is interesting to note that while the NCAA looks into money Big Z may have earned overseas, if he is cleared to play, he will be ineligible to earn NIL money inside the United States as there are visa restrictions that prohibit it. Just interesting to note that if/when cleared, Big Z won’t be eligible for the same benefit his teammates will have the opportunity to receive. Some of his teammates will make big money, while he won’t…but if he earned a little money playing ball in Europe the NCAA examines it under an apparent microscope for months. It may be the current rules, but it just doesn’t make much sense that the NCAA follows old rules for foreign-born players (which make up about 15% of Division 1 athletes), yet other college players can now make big bucks and transfer schools and that’s completely fine. Seems the NCAA needs to adjust guidelines for foreign athletes, atleast clearance-wise….even though they won’t get NIL benefits (Visa prohibited) once enrolled and playing here.
Yep. And that's the key deficit of the NCAA. In efficient bureaucracy & archaic rules that defy common sense.
The thing is, the intent of the rule to prevent pro players from playing NCAA basketball arguably has good intent. It's also antiquated and doesn't reflect the modern environment of NLI, OTE or other prep/pro academies.
What the NCAA wants to say is that NBA players shouldn't return to college basketball. What the rules say is that if an organization paying a player is deemed as a pro sports club that they can not play college basketball. Never mind that there is a canyon difference in both quality & salary between the AdmiralBet ABA League's SC Derby and the New York Knicks.
And to compound all that, HS players can now make hundreds of thousands of dollars...just so long as it's not coming from a "pro club".