The war is a good thing because we are evidently gaining an export market in natural gas and fossil fuels,
That’s one of the six effects I described, above, answering the query as to what “winning” is, or what it looks like.
But there are really others.
In reality the Russian attack on Ukraine, and its potential positives for nations that do not mimic authoritarianism, is the same process/dynamic that has unfolded since the sinking of the Spanish Armada.
England in 1588 was hardly a Democratic Haven, but had come much further along the path to Democracy than had the Spanish Monarchy.
Still, the English declared they were fighting for the rights of man, and the world’s potential for civilization.
Republics and Democracies (or nations seeking democratization) have not gone undefeated in that time span. But the trend has favored the more representative and open societies over the more dictatorial ones. This trend has obviously been led by the UK and the US, each with their own warts and shortcomings.
Ukraine is far from an ideal society, primarily because of the selfishness and
senselessness leftover from its long association with authoritarian Russia, and then the totalitarian Soviet Union.
But like Briton in 1588, Ukraine has moved more forward along the path toward constitutional stability than has it’s attacker. That and our support might not be enough to provide victory, but given history, I wouldn’t bet against them.