You pick.lol ok so when dipshit Biden promised he’d end Nord Stream, he meant he promised he was going to convince other countries to revoke the permits to operate.
Are you stupid or just disingenuous?
You pick.lol ok so when dipshit Biden promised he’d end Nord Stream, he meant he promised he was going to convince other countries to revoke the permits to operate.
Are you stupid or just disingenuous?
Yes so long as you agree that Germany refused to certify the pipeline which, in effect, ended it.I mistakenly quoted language from this thread, but here is his quote:
"If Russia invades, that means tanks or troops crossing the ... border of Ukraine again, then there will be ... no longer a Nord Stream 2. We, we will bring an end to it," Biden said. Asked how, given the project is in German control, Biden said: "I promise you, we'll be able to do it."
So, it’s just a coincidence that he said “there will be … no longer a Nord Stream 2” and “we will bring an end to it?” You agree that someone brought an end to it and there is no longer a Nord Stream, correct?
Yes so long as you agree that Germany refused to certify the pipeline which, in effect, ended it.
It’s, “A wise man once told me, don’t argue with fools, because people from a distance can’t tell who is who.”"Never argue with an idiot. You'll never convince the idiot that you're correct, and bystanders won't be able to tell who's who".
What's clear foremost is that you're FOS.America the arrogant is fully engaged in this war make no mistake. Ukraine has no sovereignty except what the US allows. How can any of you clowns say Ukraine is a sovereign nation now when it’s clear from this article it’s a pawn being used by the USA?
Would not!The eyes! 🧵
So now you believe Biden?I mistakenly quoted language from this thread, but here is his quote:
"If Russia invades, that means tanks or troops crossing the ... border of Ukraine again, then there will be ... no longer a Nord Stream 2. We, we will bring an end to it," Biden said. Asked how, given the project is in German control, Biden said: "I promise you, we'll be able to do it."
So, it’s just a coincidence that he said “there will be … no longer a Nord Stream 2” and “we will bring an end to it?” You agree that someone brought an end to it and there is no longer a Nord Stream, correct?
So you call people clowns but you either didn't read the article or didn't understand what you read. Tell us, what do you think it said?Ukraine could join ranks of ‘frozen’ conflicts, U.S. officials say
How Ukraine could become the next South Korea.www.politico.com
“The options discussed within the Biden administration for a long-term “freeze” include where to set potential lines that Ukraine and Russia would agree not to cross, but which would not have to be official borders. The discussions — while provisional — have taken place across various U.S. agencies and in the White House.”
America the arrogant is fully engaged in this war make no mistake. Ukraine has no sovereignty except what the US allows. How can any of you clowns say Ukraine is a sovereign nation now when it’s clear from this article it’s a pawn being used by the USA?
Biden said the US had nothing to do with the sabotage, but that he would get to the bottom of it. The Biden administration claimed that Russia destroyed its own pipelines.So now you believe Biden?
I’m sold!So now you believe Biden?
Nah, you’re right. Russia blowing up their own pipeline makes worlds more sense. Biden got it right.I’m sold!
That Cat has been faking his own incompetence for 15 years.
Joe “Bomber” Biden is a genius: he wields omnipotent power, and has to wear those shades lest his laser/taser vision fall upon a mere mortal.
So he blows up Nordstream II, then has a conversation with a flagpole during a break in a press conference the next day!
He lures the gullible Ruskies into a death trap, then mispronounces single syllable words like, “shade” and “Dad,” for cover!
While the world plays checkers, Biden is playing chess . . . Chinese Chess, no less (then he knocks the table over, slobbers a bit incoherently onto the pieces, etc.) but he’s playing Chess, by damn!!
Why? Russia blowing it up could have been to Russias benefit in many ways.If you read the words from the Biden administration, did anyone ever claim Russia actually blew up the pipeline? They heavily implied it, but chose their words carefully.
Obviously the corporate media then ran with the narrative and blamed Russia.
Anyone with at least one functioning brain cell knew Russia didn’t blow up the pipeline.
I'm sorry but that first sentence is so wrong its absurd.
Total authorizations (not amounts actually sent) total $113 billion, that includes military, financial, and humanitarian aid. That's not hundreds of billions as you originally said. But, you corrected your original, incorrect statement, so good for you.
Tibet was entirely remote and still quite backwards. When the Chicoms took over most of mainland China (but had yet to assert de facto suzerainty over Tibet), the volume of trade with the USA and the West at large was pretty small. Sanctions wouldn't have done much, if anything. While not as backwards as Tibet, China as a whole was pretty damn backwards and was fresh out of a civil war.
All that being said, the USA did orchestrate a huge international embargo on trade with China that was in effect from 1949 till 1971 or 1972. However, this was before the Sino-Soviet split in 1959 (I think), so the Soviets supported the Chicoms at that point. The embargo and sanctions thus didn't affect the outcome of China eventually asserting control over Tibet later in the early 1950s. It was a fait accompli, with a battle-hardened PLA against a completely backwards Tibet with a weak, outgunned, and outmanned military. Albeit, actual military engagements were quite limited. The Tibetan authorities could read the writing on the wall and signed an agreement with the Chicoms, who then occupied Tibet.
Anyway, that was a roundabout way with some historical background to say that your statement was incorrect about there not being economic sanctions. There quite clearly were, and they were ineffectual in affecting the particular outcome regarding Tibet.
If you read the words from the Biden administration, did anyone ever claim Russia actually blew up the pipeline? They heavily implied it, but chose their words carefully.
Obviously the corporate media then ran with the narrative and blamed Russia.
Anyone with at least one functioning brain cell knew Russia didn’t blow up the pipeline.
Why? Russia blowing it up could have been to Russias benefit in many ways.
1. Simple false flag to make themselves look like a victim.
2. Punishment for Europe's aid to Ukraine.
3. Russia had nothing to lose by blowing it up. It is easily fixed in less than a year and as things stood, Germany wasn't allowing its use anyway so please see reason 1 and 2.
4. The people buying their gas were not getting it from the pipeline. Pleaase see reasons 1 and 2.
5. It was a stupid thing to do. It harmed the environment and had no benefit to anyone. The only country known to be making such terrible decisions is Russia.
6. This hits on much of what I was trying to say. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-n...eam-2-sabotage-sends-warning-will-blow-pipes/
Wow, I've never seen you be so obtuse. Think whatever you'd like with your Tibet idea.No. It's right. It's just inconvenient because the only thing that makes the two situations different is one nation gave billions to politicians families for no show jobs. The other has to set themselves on fire to even get news coverage. But no one can allow themselves to see the contradiction because then it is an admission they've been fooled and we know people are way too smart to get fooled by media
So we havent said a word since 1972 back in a time when china had no interest in doing business with the world. That isn't exactly refuting my argument. It's at best arguing semantics
And thinking we would blow it up when it was already useless is also mind numbingly stupid. Last fall Europe had nearly enough LNG in storage for the winter with a plan in place to meet their goal. The pipeline wasn't going to be used.It was a huge benefit to the United States. We started shipping gas to Europe after various countries suspended the normal “environmental protections” they had in place to expedite construction of storage facilities.
Claiming Russia would punish Europe by blowing up pipelines rather than just refusing to ship gas is the most mind numbingly stupid thing that has been posted in this thread.
If you recall, this happened in the fall of last year when no one knew how bad the winter was going to be. The US blew it up (no one was blowing it up without the US involvement and permission) because they knew if push came to shove, and it was a bad winter, Germany would have been buying gas coming through the pipelines from Russia. That was the one piece of leverage Russia had.
Ok Russia did it move on. You’re not convincing anyone but if it makes you feel better everyone concede to bbfGA that’s he’s right and even though biden told us what he would do, the Russians did it. You sound like Hillary guy come on! Pound the lie until everyone believes it. The Stalinist tactics used by especially the Clinton’s and the left.And thinking we would blow it up when it was already useless is also mind numbingly stupid. Last fall Europe had nearly enough LNG in storage for the winter with a plan in place to meet their goal. The pipeline wasn't going to be used.
Once again, Biden never said any such thing.Ok Russia did it move on. You’re not convincing anyone but if it makes you feel better everyone concede to bbfGA that’s he’s right and even though biden told us what he would do, the Russians did it. You sound like Hillary guy come on! Pound the lie until everyone believes it. The Stalinist tactics used by especially the Clinton’s and the left.
Don't always agree with Peter Zeihan's takes, but that's a pretty damn good synopsis (former classmate of mine, BTW). Should be required viewing for the appeaseniks in this thread and elsewhere. Shatters so much of their b*llsh*t, simpleton analysis.
Glenn, the Tonto/Kemosabe’ joke comes from an old source.Who in the hell is this we shit Tonto?
His analyses are typically so iron-clad certain, yet based on numbers not readily available, I think he needs to slow down a tad and back his theories up with more detailed, quantitative information.Don't always agree with Peter Zeihan's takes,
Japan mulling spending billions to increase American Natural Gas production and export, to replace Russian purchases:
Japan considers financial support to boost U.S. LNG output
Tokyo and Washington to discuss cutting energy dependence on Russiaasia.nikkei.com
“WASHINGTON/TOKYO -- Japan will consider providing financial support to boost production of liquefied natural gas in the U.S., Nikkei has learned, as it seeks to lessen its energy dependence on Russia following Moscow's invasion of Ukraine.”
America First, biatches!!!
Follow the news. From a standing start in 2016, America’s LNG exports have now equaled Qatar and Australia’s.I don’t accept that those two can readily be merged. Granholm is a politician, not an expert.
Natural gas burns more cleanly than does any fossil fuel.Read (the news) to see the artificial hoops some people create:
Biden admin works on 'green' natural gas as U.S. vies for top LNG spot
The Biden administration is holding talks with global energy companies and foreign officials in an effort to set standards for certified natural gas, a form of the fuel that producers market as climate friendly.www.reuters.com
Natural gas is a clean burning fossil fuel. I wish that was the end of the conversation. Methane releases in fracking and drilling remain a battle line for “green” advocates.Natural gas burns more cleanly than does any fossil fuel.
I’m glad Biden is selling our trillion dollar surplus of natural gas from the fracking boom to the world.
Even as we lead the world in the export of LNG, we are shipping only 10-15 percent of our national production.
And we can increase the production.
True.Methane releases in fracking and drilling remain a battle line for “green” advocates.
Maybe the Greens can tolerate those goals.