That’s good to know.I have to believe any pilot that has ever flown for the US military believes 100% they would wipe the floor with multiple Russian fighters in a dog fight. Be a helluva lot of them chomping at the bit would be my guess.
We briefly entertained giving A-10s to the UAF but I guess the idea was shot down by DOD because of concerns of vulnerability to Russian air defenses.Ukraine gets a bunch of fighter aircraft then they'll be plenty of former US pilots willing to kill Russians in them.
One would think it would also be good to know whether these pilots will receive the same logistical and intelligence support they’d get from our own military.That’s good to know.
Yes! That’s got to smart in the pro-Putin crowd. International criminal is his new label.Things gotta end pretty soon now that Putin is a fugitive on the run, right?
Ukraine already has been since the start of the war. We're giving them full intel on what Russia is doing an also tactically advising them.One would think it would also be good to know whether these pilots will receive the same logistical and intelligence support they’d get from our own military.
OkThings gotta end pretty soon now that Putin is a fugitive on the run, right?
Interesting. By this, Putin apparently doesn't have a fighting force shortage.I wonder how many recruits with this tactic.
Russia's Wagner army is recruiting fighters on Pornhub in a desperate attempt to strengthen troops, report says
The Wagner Group has faced problems with recruitment after they sent thousands of their fighters to die in Ukraine.us.yahoo.com
"Don't whack off, go work for PMC Wagner," an advert on Pornhub said, according to the report.
So NATO members Poland & Slovakia think Ukraine is important enough to save to send their MIG fighter jets there. Plus Estonia has provided the most Ukraine aid per GDP size. Plus Sweden & Finland want to join NATO.
So should the U.S. be supportive of their fellow NATO members, OR, should we say to hell with Ukraine & breakup the NATO alliance?
OK, sure Russia, with these additional provisos.
Yeah, that’s not gonna happen. Non-starter."Russia is ready for the proposals of Western countries and Ukraine regarding the diplomatic settlement of the conflict, but it is possible to achieve a resolution of the conflict only by removing all sanctions and lawsuits in international bodies against Russia,"
We’re not going to stop supporting Ukraine so it’s a moot point.Do what? How and why do.you come up with this stuff?
We run NATO. We tell Ukraine to pound sand, and NATO isn't going to say or do shit about it.
You think if we stop supporting Ukraine NATO is going to fold? Kick us out?
Hahahahahah
The US has frozen $300 billion of Russian assets. Europe has frozen another $250 billion. That’s more than half a trillion dollars. And the water carriers still think we’re giving too much to Ukraine.OK, sure Russia, with these additional provisos.
1) Ukraine's borders return to status quo antebellum (2014).
2) Russia pays reparations to Ukraine. There's already $300 billion of RusGov assets frozen, so that's the starting point.
3) Immediate return of all kidnapped Ukrainians.
4) Putin and any other Russian accused of war crimes is handed over to international authorities.
What's the point of NATO if we don't all agree on action or not? They won't kick us out but will go on w/o us - Putin has them scared sh!tless - so might as well end our involvement. What other use would there be?Do what? How and why do.you come up with this stuff?
We run NATO. We tell Ukraine to pound sand, and NATO isn't going to say or do shit about it.
You think if we stop supporting Ukraine NATO is going to fold? Kick us out?
Hahahahahah
The US has frozen $300 billion of Russian assets. Europe has frozen another $250 billion. That’s more than half a trillion dollars. And the water carriers still think we’re giving too much to Ukraine.
What's the point of NATO if we don't all agree on action or not? They won't kick us out but will go on w/o us - Putin has them scared sh!tless - so might as well end our involvement. What other use would there be?
Get back to us when your last troop leaves Ukraine in a body bag.
This reason is I'm not lockstep with the cult. Same people give same "likes" to each other. You'd think there would be some independent thinking somewhere, but no.Dude. Why are you ALWAYS 100% or nothing?
Do you think NATO countries agree 100% lockstep about everything?
There is a reason you're mostly mocked in every thread. It ain't because everyone else has horrible takes, over and over again.
Whats your point here? The article is pretty clear that the Russian economy is stagnating. They can't afford to build their modern weapons. They are basically dumping oil to Asia at steep discounts. The economic problems are made even worse by the assets frozen all around the world that will eventually be used to rebuild Ukraine.Russia's economy holds up, but growing challenges test Putin
Western sanctions have hit Russian banks, wealthy individuals and technology imports. Crowds might have thinned at some Moscow malls, but not drastically. “Economically, nothing has changed,” said Vladimir Zharov, 53, who works in television.news.yahoo.com
Don't sell yourself short.Dude. Why are you ALWAYS 100% or nothing?
Do you think NATO countries agree 100% lockstep about everything?
There is a reason you're mostly mocked in every thread. It ain't because everyone else has horrible takes, over and over again.
What is this thread about? Remind me. Maybe I posted something inappropriate?Whats your point here? The article is pretty clear that the Russian economy is stagnating. They can't afford to build their modern weapons. They are basically dumping oil to Asia at steep discounts. The economic problems are made even worse by the assets frozen all around the world that will eventually be used to rebuild Ukraine.
Was that what you were getting at?
Which is indeed the veritable purpose of the war, namely regime change, as I was explaining in vain to this thread a year ago.The best resolution for Russia is to use Putin as a scapegoat, offer up General Aleksandr Dvornikov and/or Sergey Vladimirovich Surovikin for war crimes, spurn China, and seek a future with the West.
That is a smart clear doable way out of the mess they are in and it makes the most sense for what people with money in Russia would want to happen.
What is this thread about? Remind me. Maybe I posted something inappropriate?
Edit: Catmus claims to be a moderate on this issue. That is not believable. The world has sanctioned Russia and for good reason. Their economy may be stagnating, but what economy is not? The reported fact is that the sanctions have not hurt Russia as much as people had hoped and probably because the world cheats. But, are the facts here not permitted because people are too entrenched?
Me, a moderate on this issue?What is this thread about? Remind me. Maybe I posted something inappropriate?
Edit: Catmus claims to be a moderate on this issue. That is not believable. The world has sanctioned Russia and for good reason. Their economy may be stagnating, but what economy is not? The reported fact is that the sanctions have not hurt Russia as much as people had hoped and probably because the world cheats. But, are the facts here not permitted because people are too entrenched?
The US has provided more aid to Ukraine than the rest of Europe combined. So I would say that we are doing more than our fare share for NATO as usual. Also Poland's MIG's are relics and are set to be replaced with new US F-35 fighters within the next year. The Pols also have F-16's but they are not sending those.So NATO members Poland & Slovakia think Ukraine is important enough to save to send their MIG fighter jets there. Plus Estonia has provided the most Ukraine aid per GDP size. Plus Sweden & Finland want to join NATO.
So should the U.S. be supportive of their fellow NATO members, OR, should we say to hell with Ukraine & breakup the NATO alliance?
You're absolutely right, the purpose of the war was regime change. In Kiev, by Russian force of arms. Glad you've come around, SDC. Thanks to their own fortitude and international assistance, Ukraine has been able to stop Russia's naked aggression.Which is indeed the veritable purpose of the war, namely regime change, as I was explaining in vain to this thread a year ago.
Not my point. You were inferring Russia was much better off than it is. Yes, Asia has helped them a great amount but it has long been known that Russia needs oil to be 70+ and ut isn't, especially for them. Internally are they ok, i guess, but who cares. The sanctions were meant to damage their war chest, which they have, and harm the oligarchy, which they have.What is this thread about? Remind me. Maybe I posted something inappropriate?
Edit: Catmus claims to be a moderate on this issue. That is not believable. The world has sanctioned Russia and for good reason. Their economy may be stagnating, but what economy is not? The reported fact is that the sanctions have not hurt Russia as much as people had hoped and probably because the world cheats. But, are the facts here not permitted because people are too entrenched?
You're absolutely right, the purpose of the war was regime change. In Kiev, by Russian force of arms. Glad you've come around, SDC. Thanks to their own fortitude and international assistance, Ukraine has been able to stop Russia's naked aggression.
Hopefully you also support the peace proposal I outlined above. Cheers, and go Cats!
My apologies. I thought you posted a preachy post about how tough issues require more that extreme positions for people who think. Maybe that was not you. Clearly, you are not open-minded about this issue.Me, a moderate on this issue?
What silly game are you playing, Caveman?
Dude, I linked an article, one of many reporting the same thing. Take off your partisan hat.Not my point. You were inferring Russia was much better off than it is. Yes, Asia has helped them a great amount but it has long been known that Russia needs oil to be 70+ and ut isn't, especially for them. Internally are they ok, i guess, but who cares. The sanctions were meant to damage their war chest, which they have, and harm the oligarchy, which they have.
I don’t regard this as a tough issue at all. A child-stealing dictator should be brought down by any means necessary. And as long as the Russian people allow him to rule them then they’re complicit in the horror happening in Ukraine.My apologies. I thought you posted a preachy post about how tough issues require more that extreme positions for people who think. Maybe that was not you. Clearly, you are not open-minded about this issue.