Thanks for that one! They are going to come after you with the pitch forks now!
I know! I do know a pretty good deal about UK basketball and our players history. I wouldn’t make these statements if I wasn’t already 100% sure.
In the end it still wouldn’t matter. As someone pointed out earlier, I left off Willis. I did the list from memory while laying in bed on my phone last night, chances are I forgot others. Even if you leave off the multiple year players that don’t fit the narrative, you still don’t have half. Either way you spin it, I was right! At certain points it might be best for the poster who initiated the argument
@STL_Cat and those who supported it to just admit they were wrong…
If you are setting criteria for what you believe counts, then obviously you have some degree of caring or concern.
Why would it matter who recruited them? They still played multiple years for Cal. Miller literally played ¾ of his career for Cal. All those guys could have transferred like several others did, they elected to stay and play for Cal for multiple years. Thus, they became multiple year players for Cal. Also, a good % of the players we have had under Cal weren’t even recruited by him, but rather by an assistant. So, would you not count those either? Hood could have gotten out of his LOI and went literally anywhere that would take him. He actually had to get it cleared with Cal and staff to stay committed here.
It seems very desperate when you are trying to reach so hard to spin this narrative using such random stats. It’s like a Dukie saying they have the most wins on Tuesday nights in December, so that makes them great or worthy when they are sucking. It just reeks of desperation and insecurity. Stop embarrassing yourself.