#givewhitemenachance is trending on Twitter. Seems to be about black women expanding their dating options.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bleach
False.I am known for science, pragmatism and a disdain for conspiracy theories from the far left or far right. I stand by my statement of coincidence over conspiracy theory regarding the stage design.
$2.78 in Middletown today. Thanks biden.
Pure comedy gold . . . how quickly we forget that the Orangutan in Chief basically went into hiding with an empty daily schedule from Election Night through Insurrection Day.
To claim everything involves systemic racism is just as silly as saying there is no systemic racism. The truth almost always lies somewhere in between.
To claim everything involves systemic racism is just as silly as saying there is no systemic racism. The truth almost always lies somewhere in between.
@Gassy_Knowls
Damn man, I'm not sure what you did to them...
But @warrior-cat thinks you should drink bleach:
And @JStaff2187 is trying to get you to drink something offered by Bill Cosby:
Watch your back Knowls, warrior is trying to kill you and Jstaff is trying to get you raped.
Maybe I was wrong, it sounds like it is real tough being black in America.
To claim everything involves systemic racism is just as silly as saying there is no systemic racism. The truth almost always lies somewhere in between.
Drawn and quarteredIt is tough. I got these white supremacists coming after me at every angle. Rape/bleach. What's next? They going to quarter me?
It is tough. I got these white supremacists coming after me at every angle. Rape/bleach. What's next? They going to quarter me?
Really you say that with a straight face? There are literally thousands of examples of government policies that were put in place just to hold down minorities. It was baked into the ****ing constitution and had to be amended out. The war on drugs only happened because minorities took over the drug trade. The south had to be punished for decades because they wouldn't stop trying to come up with new ways to circumvent civil rights laws. Now a lot of these don't exist anymore but the effects from them definitely do. Anyone that tries to pretend otherwise is just a dipshit. This isn't shit that happened hundreds of years ago. Jim Crow laws were still in effect in the early 70's.There isn’t systemic racism. What you’re saying is that the govt is designed to intentionally hold down minorities in ways that don’t affect white people just the same, that is entirely false.
What exists are Dim social plans that bribe blacks to keep them down. Having black kids, any kids, dependent on the whims of teachers' unions is morally reprehensible. The last year of union shcools' closures will set blacks more for the next generation than any racist comments will. $400/wk to not work is offensive. The Great Society destroyed black families. But don't blame other races for blacks' problems as it's totally false.Now a lot of these don't exist anymore but the effects from them definitely do. Anyone that tries to pretend otherwise is just a dipshit.
Really you say that with a straight face? There are literally thousands of examples of government policies that were put in place just to hold down minorities. It was baked into the ****ing constitution and had to be amended out. The war on drugs only happened because minorities took over the drug trade. The south had to be punished for decades because they wouldn't stop trying to come up with new ways to circumvent civil rights laws. Now a lot of these don't exist anymore but the effects from them definitely do. Anyone that tries to pretend otherwise is just a dipshit. This isn't shit that happened hundreds of years ago. Jim Crow laws were still in effect in the early 70's.
Really shouldn't refer to that thing as she.
Paying taxes on cash that has been earned and already taxed because someone saved it sounds quite vile to me.I saw wealth tax trending in twitter. I favor that over a progressive income tax.
People should not be punished for increasing their wages. Especially not in favor of people sitting on wealth.
Incentivize spending/investing vs punishing wage earners, and you'd really see some economic explosion.
This can't be real, can it?Just this morning AOC said there is "no battle over Tiehm's buckwheat - conservation vs. green energy." She said "People is so stupid. Flinstone cars don't need no batteries."
Mental illness being celebrated is all part of the communist demoralization process.
False.Really you say that with a straight face? There are literally thousands of examples of government policies that were put in place just to hold down minorities. It was baked into the ****ing constitution and had to be amended out. The war on drugs only happened because minorities took over the drug trade. The south had to be punished for decades because they wouldn't stop trying to come up with new ways to circumvent civil rights laws. Now a lot of these don't exist anymore but the effects from them definitely do. Anyone that tries to pretend otherwise is just a dipshit. This isn't shit that happened hundreds of years ago. Jim Crow laws were still in effect in the early 70's.
Speaking of similar stupid shit that has not aged well.Remdesivir failed its clinical trial. Treatment and vaccine ain't coming anytime soon.
Paying taxes on cash that has been earned and already taxed because someone saved it sounds quite vile to me.
Teachers’ unions are practicing systemic racism by denying school choice to mainly poor inner city blacks. Gov is not doing it anywhereThere isn’t systemic racism. What you’re saying is that the govt is designed to intentionally hold down minorities in ways that don’t affect white people just the same, that is entirely false.
Your pathetic attempt at insulting him is rather comical and a bit racist at that.So says the white guy wearing a MAGA hat in Turkeyfoot Ky.
It would replace the income tax. So you'd only be taxed on wealth not earnings.
Progressive tax system penalizes someone for earning more money/being more productive. This would not. It would only penalize people who sit on their wealth instead of spend it.
As a matter of public policy, the economy is much better off when people transact business rather than rest on their hoard. That line of thought started back in the fifties or so at the University of Chicago. It's the reason many archaic retention concepts were eventually struck down (ie rule against perpetuities, many restrictive covenants, etc).
I don't think it's government's responsibility to tell you what to do with the money you have legally earned, or penalize you if you don't do what they want. I can't, for the life of me, understand where these notions come from that government should be directing in any way what people do with their property. Government needs to treat everyone the same and stay out of our personal decisions.It would replace the income tax. So you'd only be taxed on wealth not earnings.
Progressive tax system penalizes someone for earning more money/being more productive. This would not. It would only penalize people who sit on their wealth instead of spend it.
As a matter of public policy, the economy is much better off when people transact business rather than rest on their hoard. That line of thought started back in the fifties or so at the University of Chicago. It's the reason many archaic retention concepts were eventually struck down (ie rule against perpetuities, many restrictive covenants, etc).
I'm never a fan of stealing what belongs to someone else. Capital gains are what can be legally taxed not your labor. That is what I endorse. Government spending and funding should be largely gutted.It would replace the income tax. So you'd only be taxed on wealth not earnings.
Progressive tax system penalizes someone for earning more money/being more productive. This would not. It would only penalize people who sit on their wealth instead of spend it.
As a matter of public policy, the economy is much better off when people transact business rather than rest on their hoard. That line of thought started back in the fifties or so at the University of Chicago. It's the reason many archaic retention concepts were eventually struck down (ie rule against perpetuities, many restrictive covenants, etc).
Wealth tax might be the worst idea ever.
What does someone do who’s net worth is tied up in their business? What valuation methodology do we use to determine the fair market value of that business? Would forcing small business owners to sell off portions of their business to fund a wealth tax lessen their control, harming the business, thus driving the value of the business down?
I’ve heard the democrats float tax on unrealized appreciation recently. That’s goddam lunacy.
I don't think it's government's responsibility to tell you what to do with the money you have legally earned, or penalize you if you don't do what they want. I can't, for the life of me, understand where these notions come from that government should be directing in any way what people do with their property. Government needs to treat everyone the same and stay out of our personal decisions.
I'm never a fan of stealing what belongs to someone else. Capital gains are what can be legally taxed not your labor. That is what I endorse. Government spending and funding should be largely gutted.