ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Actually, it hasn't, but you keep being you.

Btw...you ever stop and think about why your opinion on here is different from 99.9% of others? You ever stop and think about why the failed policies and cultural ignorance of the left led to Trump's landslide win?

^^^obviously, you don't.
99.9% of the people in this board are MAGA, I realize that. Happy to be a common sense voice in your echo chamber and Trump circle jerk.

Also I might not like Trump but I’ve never said I’ve been a fan of the lefts policies on a lot of things (border security, most woke things) and I’ve said as much. I said Trump would win big and he did.

But hey, nice try.
 
Talking against sin kinda makes you have to speak out on Biden. I know you'll never see the difference. Chopping the genitals off a kid isn't the same thing as deporting a rapist or murderer... And you'll never understand that.
You clearly missed what she said. Not my fault.
 
Again proving you don't understand the internet.



Catturd follows people on X. By following his post it saves other people time. We don't have to sift through tons post and we can instead just follow a few aggregators. His commentary on the post he is responding to is usually funny. We understand Catturd isn't actually an investigative journalist traveling the world for news. He's just posting the stories he reads as others do the same. It allows for the spread of information to happen quickly. After how bad msm was the last 4 years you have to be incredibly stupid to think they are any better than just a random X follow.
Lmao come on. He posted a “story” from some guy on Twitter named “George”. No real facts, etc. “It allows for the spread of information to happen quickly”. Or in most cases disinformation that then gets spread quickly. Catturd commenting on some story from another “verified” source on Twitter doesn’t make it true. But you’ll run with it and post it here. Perfect example.
 
I was afraid of that. Using a disaster is not the right time for that. He can withhold other federal money to make that point but I’d say the timing of this will backfire.

Everything to Trump is the beginning of a negotiation. Maybe he shouldn't have brought voter ID into this, but he definitely should bring up conditions like the water...the federal government shouldn't help them out to the tune of 200-300 billion if California libs are not going to change course and whose policies guarantee future destruction at a similar scale.
 
I was afraid of that. Using a disaster is not the right time for that. He can withhold other federal money to make that point but I’d say the timing of this will backfire.
You mean like not helping Trump voters in NC or FL right before an election? A certain level of arm twisting needs to be done or these idiots will just lay down and whine for 4 years.
 
Trump also mentioned during this he would be signing the Laken Riley Act shortly.

Trump getting asked by the media about a hypothetical if he would responsible if something awful happened to Fauci or Bolton...speaking of Laken Riley how many times did the media ask Biden if he was responsible for her and others deaths and rapes? Well, they would have had to ask his team, Biden was always unavailable.









haha...he got asked about Schiff maybe traveling with them. "What happened to him?"


 
Last edited:
The disaster stuff is the biggest racket ever going. They overpay for everything and there are perverse incentives to not try to improve your situation.


You don't send men to migrate... you send men to war. You take your family with you if you are fleeing for a legit reason.
Not really true. I'd move to Saudi if they paid me $2M a year and send the money back. As would many men. Men travel for opportunity. Women are more likely than men not to.
 
The disaster stuff is the biggest racket ever going. They overpay for everything and there are perverse incentives to not try to improve your situation.

Not really true. I'd move to Saudi if they paid me $2M a year and send the money back. As would many men. Men travel for opportunity. Women are more likely than men not to.
But they are claiming "asylum due to some reason"... If they were not lying about that they would bring their families. You'd take your wife with you if you were fleeing from and not just going for the money.
 


Oh look. Those 17000 doctors who signed a petition against RFK jr are fake... LOL.

During covid someone created an entirely fake pediatrician that had a huge verified social media following and made the virtual rounds talking about how dangerous covid was for kids and why lockdowns and school closures were great. Iirc she even had a recurring piece in the nyt.

After a reporter did some digging to run a puff piece, she kept getting the run around. Then tried locating her contact info on state medicine boards. Wasnt there. Upon further digging she wasnt anywhere. Her office address was actually a massage parlor.

When it got out the story was about to hit the accounts closed down and everyone acted like it never happened. Id love to get some investigation on who set that up and was complicit. Social media was at least complicit because they verified a profile of someone that never existed.

Maybe. But actual productive people actually hate this shit and will probably be more than happy to narc on these neutered losers in the new Golden Age of America.

I think you are right. The incredibly heavy hand of dei had everyone walking on egg shells. No more.
 
@augustaky1 stopped by to visit, but he sure needs lessons on how to park that thing, he said eff it, I will just sell it!

629b8b2cba8dea0d677827767b7f0170.png
 
Lmao come on. He posted a “story” from some guy on Twitter named “George”. No real facts, etc. “It allows for the spread of information to happen quickly”. Or in most cases disinformation that then gets spread quickly. Catturd commenting on some story from another “verified” source on Twitter doesn’t make it true. But you’ll run with it and post it here. Perfect example.
 
Lmao come on. He posted a “story” from some guy on Twitter named “George”. No real facts, etc. “It allows for the spread of information to happen quickly”. Or in most cases disinformation that then gets spread quickly. Catturd commenting on some story from another “verified” source on Twitter doesn’t make it true. But you’ll run with it and post it here. Perfect example.
You are the perfect example of someone who doesn't know the interweb...

How many other links are needed, dumbass?!!? You people are just mad because you can't control the narrative anymore. You all actually have to defend your ideas now ... and you're so used to being the bully, and being on the wrong side of the issue, that your party cannot defend your positions. Your arrogance and bullying are the main reasons your side lost.

As I understand, if "verified" accounts post something, then they can be tried for lible. Ask the dude from Florida in 2016 who sent a joke tweet about Hillary and voting. YOU people should never be allowed near any power at all.
 
Last edited:
Maybe. But actual productive people actually hate this shit and will probably be more than happy to narc on these neutered losers in the new Golden Age of America.
This ... people have to understand that for decades many Americans have essentially been told to hate themselves for being born. These Americans are fed up with it and will happily end this evil, communistic bullshit NOW.
 
Tons are self deporting. The lines of people going back on their own is pretty long. The threat of not being eligible for anything if we have to deport you is sending tons back.
i want to believe you, but would like to see videos of it (and don't you dare just do one of the invasion videos backwards!!)

I do think completely cutting off benefits will slow the invasion a lot.
 
In the founding documents it IS codified, however, that ALL are CREATED so that is not an optional nor religion specific, dogma enshrining possibility. CREATION is not in doubt as part of the fabric of this nation. YOU may choose to believe that a pagan god created humanity. You may choose to believe that we appeared from nothingness, evolved from soup, or were created by the same in spite of what objective, observational science tells us.


In your own home or place of worship, you may do so. You may not publicly force that belief on others. You may not threaten or harm someone in order to coerce such a belief. You have the freedom to express that belief to others publicly or privately, as long as you don't hinder them doing the same.


BUT... trying to pass laws that infringe on the rights of others OR infringe on the very foundation of this republic, are expressly forbidden by its charter. And for good reason.


THIS is why Islam was not allowed as a practiced religion/political belief by anyone holding office, elected or otherwise. In some places in this country it was the same for Catholic or Jewish beliefs as well because of well-documented dogma/beliefs expressed by these faiths AGAINST what individual states and the US Constitution and Declaration, etc., established as intrinsic to this nation.


Islam allows for abuse, enslavement, and forced conversion under threat of death of anyone not a follower of its tennets.


Catholicism at various times and through unredacted/unexpunged dogmas, canons, or decrees issued by its leaders has expressed similar tenets. Judaism has expressed similar bias against those who aren't Jewish.


Communism/socialism likewise has expressed similar untenable dogmas that make it an enemy of the constitution a d the foundation of this republic.


The end result is that these beliefs and any such as are contrary to the fundamental rights expressed in the documents establishing this country cannot be allowed to be brought to the table in legal form for consideration before congress. That they HAVE been brought and some passed is treasonous just in putting them to a vote.
What is this nonsense about Catholics expressing "similar tenets" as Islam? JD Vance is Catholic. I wonder what he'd think about your post putting his faith on par with Muslims and communists.
 
In the founding documents it IS codified, however, that ALL are CREATED so that is not an optional nor religion specific, dogma enshrining possibility. CREATION is not in doubt as part of the fabric of this nation. YOU may choose to believe that a pagan god created humanity. You may choose to believe that we appeared from nothingness, evolved from soup, or were created by the same in spite of what objective, observational science tells us.


In your own home or place of worship, you may do so. You may not publicly force that belief on others. You may not threaten or harm someone in order to coerce such a belief. You have the freedom to express that belief to others publicly or privately, as long as you don't hinder them doing the same.


BUT... trying to pass laws that infringe on the rights of others OR infringe on the very foundation of this republic, are expressly forbidden by its charter. And for good reason.


THIS is why Islam was not allowed as a practiced religion/political belief by anyone holding office, elected or otherwise. In some places in this country it was the same for Catholic or Jewish beliefs as well because of well-documented dogma/beliefs expressed by these faiths AGAINST what individual states and the US Constitution and Declaration, etc., established as intrinsic to this nation.


Islam allows for abuse, enslavement, and forced conversion under threat of death of anyone not a follower of its tennets.


Catholicism at various times and through unredacted/unexpunged dogmas, canons, or decrees issued by its leaders has expressed similar tenets. Judaism has expressed similar bias against those who aren't Jewish.


Communism/socialism likewise has expressed similar untenable dogmas that make it an enemy of the constitution a d the foundation of this republic.


The end result is that these beliefs and any such as are contrary to the fundamental rights expressed in the documents establishing this country cannot be allowed to be brought to the table in legal form for consideration before congress. That they HAVE been brought and some passed is treasonous just in putting them to a vote.
So what you're saying is Protestants have been right all along and the rest of these heathens needs to scram?
 
Everything to Trump is the beginning of a negotiation. Maybe he shouldn't have brought voter ID into this, but he definitely should bring up conditions like the water...the federal government shouldn't help them out to the tune of 200-300 billion if California libs are not going to change course and whose policies guarantee future destruction at a similar scale.
Why not bring it up? CA is a POS state that can't even keep its lights on, and the largest reason is Democrats and the second largest reason is illegals. Voter ID should ABSOLUTELY be a condition. Screw those aholes.
 



By the numbers.... It looks like a bunch of people who voted for Kamala have flipped and are agreeing Trump is better for the job. Some of the polling data on issues is nuts. Axios, very left leaning, had a poll on deporting every illegal and 66% of their respondents were OK with deporting everyone. That is YUGE.
Interesting what colors they choose for the graph. looking deeper into this ... the dark blue area is +45%, the rest of the blue is ~+20% and the red areas, both of them, are -2%.

So even the liberal parts of the country are evenly split on the performance. And it is only the fringe kooks nationally that disapprove.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT