ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
I think it was when Mike Cernovich was on Tucker Carlson’s podcast that one of them made a good point o hadn’t heard articulated before.

No issue with gay men or what they do in private. However closeted gay men, and the large percentage of them in politics, are living a lie to their very core. Someone whose entire life is a lie will undoubtedly be OK lying about everything.

So Tim Wald being gay isn’t really the issue, it’s the fact his entire life is built on lies - closeted homosexual, stolen valor, etc. - that’s the issue.
Are you talking Walz or someone else?
 
Wars, Gas, Inflation, National Security, Value of your dollar, World Economy. Dems wanting more of the same, only because they hate a man mostly because of his demeanor and Tweets demonstrates a very soft, weak person.
Supporting a would-be autocrat, spitting in the face of all of our American values, just for lower gas prices, definitely "demonstrates a very soft, weak person."
 
At this rate, I suspect she is unlikely to sit for any legitimate interviews or hold any legitimate press conferences all the way until Election Day. If she does anything at all, it will be with a friendly interviewer pitching pre-vetted softball questions.

The Dems can’t afford for her to be exposed in any settings where she has to string together cogent thoughts without a teleprompter. They have to sustain a certain image of her to make it plausible she can actually win the election.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Louis_Skunt
I hated the reckless disregard for our core American constitutional values. You apparently prefer an autocrat and have shown the depth of your understanding of civics to be as shallow as the kiddie pool. What would have happened had Pence just done as Trump asked and read out his fake electors instead of the real ones? Useless engaging with someone this disingenuous who can't maintain a simple exchange and just throws up nonsense.
He's no angel, but the country was better when he was president. Is he perfect? Oh my gosh, far from it. He's made plenty of errors. But he's a safer, and smarter choice than a woman with the IQ of a cocker spaniel.

You guys demolished her 4 years because she's an idiot, dont get your pannies in a wad now that we're saying the same thing.
 
He's no angel, but the country was better when he was president. Is he perfect? Oh my gosh, far from it. He's made plenty of errors. But he's a safer, and smarter choice than a woman with the IQ of a cocker spaniel.

You guys demolished her 4 years because she's an idiot, dont get your pannies in a wad now that we're saying the same thing.
Nobody cares about Kamala. Trump was one principled evangelical away from destroying our country the last time, and he's replaced that zealot with a toady, JD Vance. He deserves to be in prison, not anywhere near the WH and levers of 'immunity for official acts' power.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stan the caddy
These people are such losers.



GVT_--BXwAAVIml
 
  • Like
Reactions: AustinTXCat
no where to go
Nobody cares about Kamala. Trump was one principled evangelical away from destroying our country the last time, and he's replaced that zealot with a toady, JD Vance. He deserves to be in prison, not anywhere near the WH and levers of 'immunity for official acts' power.
the Dems had their shot to try trump constitutionally through impeachment. Instead they blew their wad immediately. Without doing any investigation. Trump as president was tried via the mechanism of the constitution for criminal activity by a president in office. That is impeachment and he was acquitted. Yes anythibg that he is accused of doing while in office must be conducted through impeachment. Theoretically he can be impeached at anytime even after leaving office.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AustinTXCat
no where to go

the Dems had their shot to try trump constitutionally through impeachment. Instead they blew their wad immediately. Without doing any investigation. Trump as president was tried via the mechanism of the constitution for criminal activity by a president in office. That is impeachment and he was acquitted. Yes anythibg that he is accused of doing while in office must be conducted through impeachment. Theoretically he can be impeached at anytime even after leaving office.
Impeachment has nothing to do with criminal prosecution. As the constitution itself specifies:

Article 1, Section 3: "Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law."

It says the opposite of what you're claiming. It specifies impeachment can carry no additional penalty beyond removal and disqualification, and that all further penalties are handled by criminal prosecution, which the impeached is still subject to.
 
That's not a guarantee as there's no constitutional or legal mechanism to handle it. The only other time something similar was tried it wasn't adjudicated by SCOTUS. Trump retains the presidency unless some mechanism is invented to force him out. Who and what would that be? Would it work or lead to further unrest and separation? None of us have any clue. Definition of a constitutional crisis. We'd be flying blind through deadly waters. Some would be defending him and others would be trying to depose him. Civil War II.

lol

You lunatics act like Trump is still in office.

There was blatant, obvious fraud and he still left office. Didn’t try and command the military he controlled to do anything about the fraud. Didn’t try to maintain power. Etc. He left.

There was a riot on January 6. The government has still never told us how many federal agents they had on the ground escalating the riot, and why they opened the doors to the Capitol. But without a doubt, the federal government did far more to provoke the rioters than Trump telling people to peacefully protest.

Congress ran a sham commission to place blame on Trump and whitewash the federal government involvement.

You are the exact gullible fool the January 6 sham commission was set up for.
 
I think there may be legs to the explanation that the whole “joy” campaign is simply a version of “mom’s not drunk, she’s just happy.”

Is kamabla a raging alcoholic? That would help to explain her inability to speak, lack of decision making ability, random laughing, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bigblueinsanity

Ill give her this: thats much better than before. Granted thats an extremely low bar. At least this answer sounds competent to someone who either doesn't understand anything or doesn't care to.


We will see. Hopefully its all just trying play off the sympathy that theyre under danger but i don't see it. Those capable of such attacks all play on the same team as the dnc.

Might we get yet another pipe bomb that magically doesn't go off? Or some thwarted attack where a random sacrificial lamb gets jail for life ala the alla superman video? Something along those lines definitely possible but nothing real.


If trump can win, he needs to let desantis lead the team to dismantle the cheating. Desantis obviously understands how its working and how to stop it. I think he could do it while remaining governor.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT