There is so much just wrong, unjust and I would venture to guess unconstitutional, with everything mentioned in that article.
"In his sentencing memo, Biden-Harris U.S. Attorney Matthew Graves opined that because Lavrenz had pointed out the political persecution of J6ers, she should be considered “unrepentant” in her “promotion of the riot.” That, Graves laughably claims, “is powerful evidence that she continues to pose a threat to future acts of political violence.”
"unrepentant" meaning what? that she refused to be "reeducated"?
"Faruqui also ordered Lavrenz to submit to government monitoring software on her computer and mobile phone, further limiting her digital freedom. Additionally, she will not be allowed to meet with her Congressman or Senator at the Capitol without the permission of her Probation Officer, adding another layer of restriction to her sentence."
No violation of her 1A rights there at all. She shouldn't need permission to meet with her Representatives.
"Judge Faruqui is also believed to have remarked, “You went in to try to find Congresspeople to find them and confront them. That’s unacceptable. You can’t do that. Nobody can do that. The way to do that is through our legal system. To go to court.”"
Uhhh, Seriously? then why hasn't this very same sentence and fine been levied against ANY of the Pro-Palestinian Protestors and any other Liberal protest group that has entered the Capitol Building or camped out in various representatives offices?
"The judge’s comments also extended to the financial support Lavrenz received for her legal defense, which he ordered to be confiscated. He claimed the funds were inappropriately raised, stating, “There is a wellspring of money that you have that I don’t believe is appropriate for you to have.”"
That sounds wholly unconstitutional right there.