I mean if you're going to the wording of the Constitution, it doesn't mention peers at all. That came from the Magna Carta. The Sixth:OJ wasn't.
The constitution calls for an IMPARTIAL jury of his peers.
Peers who voted 90% against him in the district and who voted in a prosecutor who ran on getting Trump.
Lets not even discuss the Judge whose daughter was raising millions off of it.
So HIS peers? Nope. Not at all.
"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence."