POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
Either of the two of Biden or Harris are nothing more than figureheads. Harris wouldn’t be the one destroying the country, the Globalist Oligarchs manning her puppet strings would be that.
Can he do something about the ridiculous blackout rules?
I can't watch the reds or the Indians, even when they're on the road.
Obscene.
The immunity opinion states clearly: "the president isn't above the law"
Do you understand how stupid you sound with your bluanon conspiracies?
Still waiting for an answer why biden isn't in jail for illegal student loan forgiveness. No immunity!
He also thought J Edgar Hoover was President.
They ruled today that PRESIDENT'S, not just a certain President has immunity on official office decisions. If this is such a bad thing, why are there not repubs squealing abut it to? If it does not serve their agenda, they are always crying.
Actually by them splitting his terms they did strategically remove a massive grip hold he’d have created with 8 straight years.
Do not kid yourself in thinking the way it’s gone is going to be as productive as him continuing on what he was on pace to do.
After Trump the party is going to struggle very badly.
Because both the criminal presidents of modern history, Nixon and Trump, were Republicans.
Sotomayor to retire, they give Kamala the job/a job for life and that paves the way to get another POTUS while making everyone happy?
Seems like a longshot but nothing would surprise me. Heard it on the radio
Also heard that "Jill Biden fly's her manicurist and pedicurist in from Deleware twice a month."
Seems like a longshot but nothing would surprise me. Heard it on the radio
Also heard that "Jill Biden fly's her manicurist and pedicurist in from Deleware twice a month."
I would like Willy’s opinion on this before agreeing.
I think this might be an “eye of the beholder” type of situation.
🫣🤥🤢🤧
Biden should order the FBI to raid Alito's house as a domestic threat and preemptively pardon any charges resulting from excessive force. Those are unquestionably "core" official acts and should fall under the new standard of absolute immunity, correct? Which means his motives surrounding them can't be questioned and evidence concerning them can't be used? Paging the thread lawyers, @Dore95 and @Caveman Catfan and anyone else I'm leaving out.
Forgot me, but I’m just going to tell you you’re retarded for asking such a stupid question.
Hahaha, now you all see what a true Nazi fascist thinks about “democracy”
This guy is the face of a loser. A complete and utter loser. I’ve been telling you all this guy is an evil POS and here it is.
Cope harder loser. And burn in Hell. Please
You're right I did, apologies. Now. Ha ha insults be funny. But actually seriously, why? If intent/motivation of the president can no longer be considered, what's to stop a president using his official powers corruptly? Sotomayor alluded to this in her dissent; it isn't just internet crazies. You were quick to jump in to flaunt your expertise so I'm sure you have something concrete to add.
It seems the simple response to the left-narrative of, "yea Trump won, but he lied the whole time ..." is this:
In Biden's OPENING Comment he said, "Just inject a little bleach in your arm. It’d be all right." Which has been proven 1,000 times is a bold-faced lie. In his OPENING Comment!
Then in his first "response", he said this whopper, "I’m the only president this century that doesn’t have any – this – this decade – doesn’t have any troops dying anywhere in the world, like he did."
So, in his first canned statement and his first response, Biden BOLD-FACED lied. The opening comment should be the most egregious because he PLANNED to say it. However, his first response saying no troops dying is just ridiculous.
So, Biden PLANNED to lie and PLANNED to not be held accountable. Typical lib...
hey DA, answer the question instead of spewing your ignorant hate. what part of this is untrue?
"most historically significant books and a cornerstone of Western civilization"?
And BTW, you inadvertently showed your true colors...
If you're teaching it as part of a segment on various religions, sure. But human history has a long legal tradition of which the Bible is only a small part. Putting it singularly on a pedestal in that context risks running afoul of the First.
because it is not "justice" you queef. It is open lawfare. But you keep making the argument your party wants you to make, Revolutionary!!
Don't you know ... real "justice" just hasn't been tried yet ...
Leftists are like house cats. If they were 10 times bigger they would eat you alive in a heart beat. Give them enough power, and there's nothing they won't do to keep it and bend you to their will. They don't even really try to hide it. They just aren't big enough.....yet.
And they post here too! LMAO.
Similar threads
