He has inflation "down to" around 65% per year vs. 200%+ when he came to office. When we were there in Feb/Mar, people much preferred $ over anything else. $20 was like gold.
Last edited:
He has inflation "down to" around 65% per year vs. 200%+ when he came to office. When we were there in Feb/Mar, people much preferred $ over anything else. $20 was like gold.
gonna be interesting to see who trump picks. there are several i like; vance, ramaswammy, scott, maybe rubio
Dems ‘fear’ this possible Trump VP pick who ‘could spell the end for Biden’
“Rubio is a familiar face who has become one of the strongest voices in the Senate for the America First agenda, is excellent on TV, and can blast Biden effectively for his failed policies,&#…nypost.com
Ya get your info from the Russian plant working in the FBI?? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
We were talking about what arbitrary number makes someone a fetus versus a baby. And I used examples of other arbitrary ages used for legal purposes. Examples. Supporting evidence. Now it’s your turn.I’ll go back to what I sent before. You’re struggling with this entire conversation, and I am surprised you continue to make statements that don’t reflect your statement in question, which was a response to a question I asked.
We aren’t talking about what arbitrary number makes someone an adult versus a child. You’re trying to point us in that direction.
Here’s for try number four.
It isn't supposed to be a real-life scenario, though those do play out in rare cases. It's a thought experiment. A hypothetical. What it really is is a variant of the Trolley Problem, but that's neither here nor there. If both supposed lives are theoretically equal, why save the mother? The fetus has many more years ahead of it, shouldn't they be prioritized?Priority is always placed on the mother because that’s in the best interest of both the mom and the kid. The scenario you’re mentioning is typically stuff from soap operas and not real modern medicine. The whole doctor coming out to the waiting room asking the father which one to save is just not reality today.
Medical teams always have the goal of the best outcome for both mother and baby and the vast majority of risk has already been assessed and planned for way ahead of time before labor comes into play.
No, no one has as of yet.wtf are you talking about? Several of us have already addressed that. You are just being a jerk, again.
And still no defn of murder and no successful communist countries ... ever.
That’s why I like my signature so much. John Prine sang it. Obviously in a bit of a different context, but the statement on its own applies in many contexts. Especially with what’s going on in the world today.So the manifesto shows the clear agenda that the trans person's agenda was to murder white Christians.
Change those 2 words to almost any other demo, and this would be a "hate crime".
Even the left should agree w that.
Also, the person was also full of drugs that, maybe, we should re-evaluate the drugs usage. The drugs that are supposed to "help" people are actually making a significant number worse, far worse. Bad enough they are willing to shoot completely innocent children. Sad how down is up and up is down in society these days.
You’re still lost. Re-read that entire paragraph and maybe, just maybe you can come back into the conversation on the 5th try.We were talking about what arbitrary number makes someone a fetus versus a baby. And I used examples of other arbitrary ages used for legal purposes. Examples. Supporting evidence. Now it’s your turn.
I know where you are trying to go with this gotcha "thought experiment". But the reality is the fetus is less likely, and may not survive outside the mother. If they could out off the procedure a few weeks or months, then maybe both can be saved. This is personal ... my DIL is going through a similar situation tomorrow AM. I pray they both make it.It isn't supposed to be a real-life scenario, though those do play out in rare cases. It's a thought experiment. A hypothetical. What it really is is a variant of the Trolley Problem, but that's neither here nor there. If both supposed lives are theoretically equal, why save the mother? The fetus has many more years ahead of it, shouldn't they be prioritized?
No successful communist countries? Agree. See that wasnt so hard, you should feel better about yourself. Groomer.No, no one has as of yet.
Dammit!! I am Lost (TM)!! Do not try to give him my title!!You’re still lost. Re-read that entire paragraph and maybe, just maybe you can come back into the conversation on the 5th try.
I hope nothing but good things for your personal situation. But as for the hypothetical, it isn’t a ‘gotcha’ and you didn’t answer it. I specifically predicated that the fetus was viable in the premise. Both mother and fetus have equal chance to live, but you can only save one. Who and why?I know where you are trying to go with this gotcha "thought experiment". But the reality is the fetus is less likely, and may not survive outside the mother. If they could out off the procedure a few weeks or months, then maybe both can be saved. This is personal ... my DIL is going through a similar situation tomorrow AM. I pray they both make it.
No successful communist countries? Agree. See that wasnt so hard, you should feel better about yourself. Groomer.
Simple. If i can only save one, i would ask the mother which one. It is her choice.I hope nothing but good things for your personal situation. But as for the hypothetical, it isn’t a ‘gotcha’ and you didn’t answer it. I specifically predicated that the fetus was viable in the premise. Both mother and fetus have equal chance to live, but you can only save one. Who and why?
Hopefully whatever utter BS actions the Biden admin makes can/will be reversed when Trump is back in office.Biden's killshot for ICE cars? I wonder if they banned private jets at the same time?
Biden unveils latest attempt to kill off gas cars before 2032
The White House told automakers they have eight years to squeeze another 16 mpg out of their cars if they want to stay in business - while the fuel efficiency of their trucks will have to doublewww.dailymail.co.uk
Why?Simple. If i can only save one, i would ask the mother which one. It is her choice.
Why is it her choice? Are you daft? It is her AND her childs lives.Why?
No respect for the people that protect you and your loved ones. Sad. Typical modern American. Thinks disrespecting the police and teachers is cool. And people wonder why crime and schools are so bad now.
It is her OR her 'child's' life. Why should only she get to choose? The fetus doesn't get a voice.Why is it her choice? Are you daft? It is her AND her childs lives.
This may be anethema to your worldview, but not all of us want to control everyone.
Who would you pick? The mother or the child and why?
What is the fetus? Is it human? Or a horse?It is her OR her 'child's' life. Why should only she get to choose? The fetus doesn't get a voice.
I would pick the mother, because the fetus isn't a person yet.
But thank God none of them left tire marks anywhereOur capital, once symbolic of the virtues of the settlers of this country, now more akin to Babylon, Sodom, or Gomorrah.
It isn't supposed to be a real-life scenario, though those do play out in rare cases. It's a thought experiment. A hypothetical. What it really is is a variant of the Trolley Problem, but that's neither here nor there. If both supposed lives are theoretically equal, why save the mother? The fetus has many more years ahead of it, shouldn't they be prioritized?
No, no one has as of yet.