POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
How many nights a week does Biden wake up now knowing where he is?
The only reason why leftists love abortion is because they hate conservatives more.
You see. I hate liberals. But I don’t wish they kill their babies because those babies may grow up to be America First supporters unlike their evil ass leftist parents.
Leftists are awful human beings and should be treated like food on a plate
I almost never do it but I looked at CNN’s account of it and their headline is that Gaza is saying 200 people were killed to save four. Liberals are rotten to the core.
Known for years and fully prepared. I know who the enemy is.
Well, Stan is Johnkba, the Canuck who throws out the n-word about justice Thomas, amd he's banned from posting here, but like a complete loser, still reads posts, and leaves laughy face emojis like a 10 year old.
Infamous for his boasting of his W-2.
Yeah, > can't really take seriously the argument of anyone crying about gazans being killed, while being pro-abortion.
There is not one serious person who considers that a legitimate prosecution or verdict. The entire exercise was designed for one purpose: to get sheep like yourself to use the words felon and Trump in the same sentence.
It is really quite simple. And this is going to end bad for your position. How do you define a person?
Actually it is quite simple. Consider this for the scenario in which the mother's life is in jeopardy ... if a doctor COULD save both, would they? That answer is YES. Also, if the doctor does NOTHING, then both patients would die. Therefore, it is technically a procedure to save the mother and unfortunately, the child often doesn't or is unable to survive.
So, it is not really a good question. It is a tough situation because sane, moral people want to save BOTH lives, but unfortunately are unable to.
He’s the best POTUS that non-Americans have ever had. It’s literally true.Biden Scores Migrants More Jobs While Americans Drop Out of Workforce
President Joe Biden's economic agenda is scoring foreign-born workers more jobs in the United States labor market.www.breitbart.com
No. C'mon Hyman. You're smarter than that. You're being unusually mentally lazy on this one. See my previous post.
Because that’s when actual medical issues cause there to be a distinction and a prioritization.
As opposed to killing an otherwise perfectly viable person for no reason other than convenience.
She is YOU. I see no difference other than you are more evil.
Yes Dion. You said ... "There aren’t hard-and-fast scientific demarcations on these [baby, child, adult] things."
JSgorocks said, It's an inaccurate statement. So NOW you have the burden of proof to demonstrate there aren't hard and fast scientific demarcations. Good luck moving the goalposts!
And I'm still waiting to find out where communism has worked. The way you argue for it, there should be many, many examples. But you never provide any. Wonder why?
Here's the statement you're referring to that you bolded in its appropriate context:
I gave other examples of similar concepts in that very post. And in this one on the same page I lay out specific other legal examples of the same thing:
Are you arguing that 21 should always be the legal drinking age in all circumstances? Of course not, many societies have different drinking ages. Some idiots shouldn't be drinking no matter how old they are. It isn't a hard-and-fast scientific law like the Second Law of Thermodynamics. That's readily apparent, but I can continue providing examples if you'd like. Now where's your support for your assertion that the opposite is true and these things are concrete? Because that's the only way my assertion could possibly be "inaccurate".
Merriam-Webster has it as: a human individual. Seems reasonable to me. What's your definition?
I am, and always WILL, stick with: "If you're old enough to join the military, or theoretically be drafted", then you're old enough to drink. Make of that what you will. I don't care what age you set that at, but it needs to be the same.
What about if the fetus is viable and can be saved OR the mother can, but not both?
Yeah, blind yourself, but no one believes you. Society in 2024 is oppressing the Alphabet Cult? Your self deception is pathetic.
This is the sort of thing your cult loves. Words mean nothing, so you can say anything. I agree that following your cult would lead to arbitrariness.
Science is clear, even if you are blind. Human life starts in the womb. Abortion kills humans. You must bend words and seek false distinctions so that you can attempt to justify the killing. The most innocent and helpless killed by your cult by the millions.
And, you talk about the oppressed. You are the oppressor.
Typically lazy of you. You once again demonstrate zero ability to think on your own. You need someone else to tell you what to think. Good thing I'm here.
How do you define a "human individual"? Is a unique set of human DNA a unique human individual? Yes or no?
“Who am I to decide, so let’s err on the side of death!!!!”
The rationale of the oppressor. KILL THE BABIES!
My man, we know what statement is being referenced. I just told you that in my previous response, you don’t need to reiterate it back to me. You just gave all that bluster to completely avoid what you’re saddled with.
So let’s do this again. I initially asked a question. You answered and I highlighted a statement in your answer that I told you is inaccurate. I don’t have to prove it’s inaccurate. Burden of proof is on you. You can spin, delay, and filibuster all you want, it doesnt make any less evident that you’re obligation is to prove your statement.
So here’s your third opportunity to back up your statement. Maybe I should just take the W and move on while you struggle to figure yourself and this conversation out.
The biggest case of election interference in the world, all reduced to a byline by an admitted fraud of a pandemic and afterward by a staged and also false "insurrection."
Never forget that the corrupt will lie incessantly and wherever possible, knowing full well it will take years for the truth to come out. In the meantime they will grind to dust absolutely everything anyone has built and not care one bit. They don't operate with any honor, as there is no honor among thieves.
Let me clarify/simplify this ... intentions.
With respect to the doctor's actions ... is it intentional to kill the person/patient/baby (all 3 are synonymous in this scenario)? If intentional, then yes, that is murder. If a heart transplant goes bad and the patient dies, is that murder? No! It is an unfortunate reality. Similarly, when the mother's life is in jeopardy ... if the mother's life WASNT in jeopardy, then the procedure would not be taking place in the first place, so the doctor is not going into the procedure with the intention to kill the baby.
Every other case of abortion, it is by definition, the intentional ending of an innocent human being, and that is murder. Period.
This pathetic attempt belies the shoddy, sophomoric moral underpinnings that the pro-abortion crowd relies upon.
How about pulling the plug on a loved one, Karl? Gonna argue that it’s murder? Gonna pretend it’s like chopping up a healthy unborn baby in the womb?
Don’t you ever wonder how you got into such an ideological purgatory, and if you’ll ever escape it?
Yep. People act like they don't have to take the baby out regardless of whether it's alive or dead. If you can take it out and keep it alive then why not do that.... If you could save both but choose to kill the baby.... It really is simple once you realize the reality.
And if Elon had not bought Twitter, the info may still not have been out there the way it is now.
