Of course the mother, it has rights and the fetus doesn’t.
But you didn’t answer the question. Why does the mother get to pick herself to live and the fetus doesn’t? According to your view the fetus is a person with equal rights, so why do you think the mother’s decision/opinion has more weight?
And once again, you're trying to obfuscate because you have wrapped YOURSELF in a triple pretzel and cannot get out. Your hypothetical doesn't make ANY sense.
- If the human baby was viable, and the mother's life was not in jeopardy, then there is no procedure. - If the human baby is viable, and the mother is dying, then you'd have to try to save the child ... no choice necessary.
- If the mother is okay and the baby is not viable, then there is no choice either, but that isn't in your rule set.
-- The best example of your rule set is an ectopic pregnancy, except the child is not viable yet.
SOOOO, your attempt at "gotcha" is really stupid. Because you're in a bind and have no other way out.
I never said the mother's decision carries more weight. I said it is her decision, not mine. As far as the baby choosing ... the thing about unborn babies, they don't communicate real well. They do not have a fully functioning brain. In most people that comes later, unlike you.
NOW that is settled, you still haven't defined "murder".