For Biden putting a hit out for his political rival. The FACT that deadly force was authorized at the maralago raid. You, and the lefties, seem to be okay with that.No idea what you are talking about? The trial or his life?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For Biden putting a hit out for his political rival. The FACT that deadly force was authorized at the maralago raid. You, and the lefties, seem to be okay with that.No idea what you are talking about? The trial or his life?
The use of Creator was specifically not a reference to that Abrahamic God. It's the terminology of the Deists of the day, which basically believed in a creative force that kicked the universe off and then stood back and watched. It's basically just science, study of the natural world 'given to us by God'. They didn't have the Big Bang Theory and theoretical physics, it was contained in 'naturalism'. Deism is specifically a rejection of institutionalized religious thought that claimed monopoly on knowledge. Its heart is rationalism, as opposed to the doctrines of any religion.
So? TJ was entitled to his opinion. Meaningless today. Just like the founders never envisioned an AR15 making the 2nd ripe for a broad interpretation today as you would assert. So the first can too be reimagined more broadly.The legal foundation is in the First Amendment. You know, the one you thought was the 2nd. The phrase itself comes from one of Jefferson's letters, he already linked it:
"Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between Church & State." - Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Danbury Baptists 1802
A formal one until his mom yanked it and he took a different path through life. Which was obviously a pivotal one in the founding of our great nation. But that doesn't make his background typical of the Founding Fathers. He was the exception, not the rule.How much did Washington have access to?
It's not a judgement. Washington kicked ass. A freedom fighter of upstanding character. Who insisted on stepping down after only two terms so as not to create any tradition of American monarchy. Imagine if that had been Trump...One of us is being a contrarian. Possibly the one saying that the most respected man in our history was a bumpkin. His farewell address alone guided policy and government for over a century.
As an avowed Communist Dsus has a bitter taste in his mouth for the father of our country. He sees Marx, Engles, Lenin and Stalin as his Mt. Rushmore.One of us is being a contrarian. Possibly the one saying that the most respected man in our history was a bumpkin. His farewell address alone guided policy and government for over a century.
When have I ever asserted that about the 2nd? When you have to jump to irrelevant strawmen like that you know you're in too deep.So? TJ was entitled to his opinion. Meaningless today. Just like the founders never envisioned an AR15 making the 2nd ripe for a broad interpretation today as you would assert. So the first can too be reimagined more broadly.
That is so wrong it's laughable aside from the danger of being so extremely uninformed about the majority of Democrat's abortion views.Again…what YOU are for is not what the people that YOU vote for want. They want unlimited infanticide because lack of accountability is their bedrock principal in all things, from crime to student loans to abortion and beyond.
You are saying, YOURSELF, that you agree with the overwhelming number of Republicans about it. While in the next breath saying that this amounts to religion running the country!
While they use “abortion rights” as the rally cry for millions of deluded and heartless women.
Let’s be real: you can never be a democrat and want restrictions on it. Is that not obvious?
So more than Lincoln. Thank you.A formal one until his mom yanked it and he took a different path through life. Which was obviously a pivotal one in the founding of our great nation. But that doesn't make his background typical of the Founding Fathers. He was the exception, not the rule.
No, they had similar amounts, a handful of years in childhood and that's it. Did you even have a point in bringing up Lincoln?So more than Lincoln. Thank you.
Exactly, as I said in my original post on the topic, it was an intentionally inclusionary term that referred to everyone. Christians and atheists and Hindus and your mom. All religions are equally separate from our government.It may not be a direct reference to the Abrahamic God, but it’s not an exclusion either. That’s part of the genius of the wording. Men like John Jay and Thomas Jefferson can arrive at the same place with the meaning of the text despite having a different picture in their head of the word “Creator.”
Your ilk argue that continuously. The founders never envisioned______________. The 2nd is living and open to revision. But the 1st? Not open to a modern adjustment because the founders never imagined.... As the left has done for decades using the non-existant "separation" as a cudgel. Prayer in the classroom? Separation. A nativity scene. Separation. BS. A nativity scene is not congress making a law as to a state CofE.When have I ever asserted that about the 2nd? When you have to jump to irrelevant strawmen like that you know you're in too deep.
The First doesn't just ban a state religion, it bans any religious affiliation. Wtf is the part after the comma if the First only does what you're saying?Your ilk argue that continuously. The founders never envisioned______________. The 2nd is living and open to revision. But the 1st? Not open to a modern adjustment because the founders never imagined.... As the left has done for decades using the non-existant "separation" as a cudgel. Prayer in the classroom? Separation. A nativity scene. Separation. BS. A nativity scene is not congress making a law as to a state CofE.
Your stupidly dripping contempt for GW in that post. You based it with saying he was a bumpkin who lacked education and contributed nothing. So I simply brought up the least educated Preaident, Lincoln to gauge your contempt for him.No, they had similar amounts, a handful of years in childhood and that's it. Did you even have a point in bringing up Lincoln?
LOL. A nativity scene placed by a citizen is free exercise. Can you read the actual words without placing your own view of what you are told it says. It is pretty easy to read if you try. Do not legislate in DC a CofE, or prohib a prayer in school and you are not in violation. Your ilk spins it waaaaaaaaaaay beyond the words written.The First doesn't just ban a state religion, it bans any religious affiliation. Wtf is the part after the comma if the First only does what you're saying?
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."
I don't have contempt for either of them. Either way though, how I feel about George Washington has no bearing on how much he contributed to our foundational documents. That's an independent matter of historical fact. Right?Your stupidly dripping contempt for GW in that post. You based it with saying he was a bumpkin who lacked education and contributed nothing. So I simply brought up the least educated Preaident, Lincoln to gauge your contempt for him.
You keep saying that without offering any evidence to back it up. How about you answer this that you never did?LOL. A nativity scene placed by a citizen is free exercise. Can you read the actual words without placing your own view of what you are told it says. It is pretty easy to read if you try. Do not legislate in DC a CofE, or prohib a prayer in school and you are not in violation. Your ilk spins it waaaaaaaaaaay beyond the words written.
This is at least the second time I've seen you try to make this OF and FROM distinction. What are you trying to say? They are the same. There is no freedom of religion if we are not free from religion. How am I religiously free if I am forced to participate? Explain wtf you're talking about.
So freedom OF choice is the same as freedom FROM choice.You keep saying that without offering any evidence to back it up. How about you answer this that you never did?
If you had any intellectual depth you'd just answer the question. Instead you play games.So freedom OF choice is the same as freedom FROM choice.
Good to know. In KY you have the freedom From having an abortion.
Nobody is stopping you or any other Christian in America from placing a big ass Nativity scene on their front lawn short of HOA restrictions they agreed to when buying their property. In that event, put the live camel in their living room. Go for it!LOL. A nativity scene placed by a citizen is free exercise. Can you read the actual words without placing your own view of what you are told it says. It is pretty easy to read if you try. Do not legislate in DC a CofE, or prohib a prayer in school and you are not in violation. Your ilk spins it waaaaaaaaaaay beyond the words written.
Not me... It was people in NY who were guessing why Merchan didn't want to allow Trump to have fri as an off day. Obviously keeping him off the campaign trail for a day was one but apparently othodox Jews have some religious service they attend on Wed that preclude them from serving on the jury. The area the jury pool is in is 93% democrat voters. The othodox community in that area is the only demo that is close to 50/50.So you believe Orthodox Jews don’t work on Wednesday? You make crazy allegations with nothing to back it up.
I get your feelings on the subject, but those things don't have a constitutional ban like religion.Disclaimer: This, to me, includes any discussion of "sociological" issues, like gender fluidity, discussion of current political climate etc.
American public education doesn't have TIME for these things. We're so far behind right now, we need to concentrate on literacy, math, science.
For my part, I'm currently working with one of the Scott Co. Board of Education members to help me start a grassroots Math and Science tutoring program on Saturdays for at risk students (to include bus transportation to and from for the kids)
And an Epstein enthusiast.Not me... It was people in NY who were guessing why Merchan didn't want to allow Trump to have fri as an off day. Obviously keeping him off the campaign trail for a day was one but apparently othodox Jews have some religious service they attend on Wed that preclude them from serving on the jury. The area the jury pool is in is 93% democrat voters. The othodox community in that area is the only demo that is close to 50/50.
Now imagine a DA making crazy allegations against a former president with nothing to back it up... and then the judge in question makes every ruling in favor of the prosecution... Wild right.
I guess Dershowitz is a nutjob right wing guy too?
Edit... Trial on Fri's because the service is on Fri. I got that backwards.
Christchurch and Dylann Roof were well before any lockdowns. Disaffected young men are online every day, pandemic or not.
Thanks for confirming you don’t have any idea what you’re talking about. You speak about Jewish people as if they’re some novelty. The Jewish sabbath is Saturday and begins at sundown on Friday. We’re in the spring/summer so there is no way that anyone could argue that having trial on Fridays was an attempt by the judge to “keep Jews off the jury” as you said.Not me... It was people in NY who were guessing why Merchan didn't want to allow Trump to have fri as an off day. Obviously keeping him off the campaign trail for a day was one but apparently othodox Jews have some religious service they attend on Wed that preclude them from serving on the jury. The area the jury pool is in is 93% democrat voters. The othodox community in that area is the only demo that is close to 50/50.
Now imagine a DA making crazy allegations against a former president with nothing to back it up... and then the judge in question makes every ruling in favor of the prosecution... Wild right.
I guess Dershowitz is a nutjob right wing guy too?
Edit... Trial on Fri's because the service is on Fri. I got that backwards.
For Biden putting a hit out for his political rival. The FACT that deadly force was authorized at the maralago raid. You, and the lefties, seem to be okay with that.
Heard Dana Loesch excusing the language in the warrant, saying the same language was used in the Biden home search in Delaware.So you are back to criticizing your own side. Not just this post, but several. That took less than a week.
I havent seen your outrage at biden OR his admin for ordering a hit on his political rival.
let that sink in everyone ... biden ordered a hit on trump hoping to assassinate him. Of course that will not be a question during the debate and no one will be held accountable.
Imagine if the roles were reversed. You ppl on the left are simply terrible people.