ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
The deck is too stacked to beat Hillary. She's an evil psychopath that has been exposed time after time but she has so many brainwashed yups and every minority and special interest group imaginable. She's the epitome of the white leftist elitist who manipulates blacks, Hispanics, etc into thinking she's "for them" and panders to their paranoia and hatred of whites.

You simply can't beat her when the media is her mouthpiece, when our universities churn out millions of clueless and brainwashed kids and she has the aggrieved black crowd who votes Democrat no matter what, they now have the Hispanic crew who despite not having the same values as Dems is convinced protecting borders is "Racist" and now she has a lot of women convinced they're oppressed.

Oh, these people will find out what real oppression is when they see the results of their stupidity and see what big government and millions of more Muslims looks like.
 
Dem voters like to portray themselves as the intelligent party but their voter base is easily the most misinformed and does not follow politics at all simply because they're only surrounded by their viewpoint 24/7, which makes them intellectually lazy.

Because most Dem voters are stupid, Dems and the media focus on social issues 24/7 because they're too dumb to understand anything else. So they whip up a narrative of "oppression" or "Trump said someone was fat" or "Look at this Trump tweet" to decide your vote.

Most of them think the email thing is a witch hunt, they have no idea about the Clinton Foundation scam, Haiti corruption, $6 billion vanishing under her watch, Benghazi lies, the ties between her husband's pardoning criminals and connections to her campaign, they have no idea who George Soros is, they didn't read the DNC leaks, etc. They're simply idiots and now through immigration, they will forever have the numbers.
 
Last edited:
Where does it say in our constitution that we must allow Syrians and Muslim psychopaths into our country?

These people f'ked us

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refugee_Act (enacted 1980)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Carter (dem)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/96th_United_States_Congress (majority democrat, both houses)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Mondale (Senate President - dem)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_Magnuson (Senate Pro Temp - dem)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Byrd (senate majority leader - dem)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tip_O'Neill (speaker of the house, the one and only - dem, dem, dem, dem, dem)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Wright (house majority leader - dem)
 
Is this thing finally over? We now have 4 national polls with coverage into October:

CBS Clinton +6
CNN Clinton +6
NBC Clinton +6
Economist/Yougov Clinton +5

And then the LA Times daily tracking poll, which has Trump +4. And looks for all the world like an outlier.
 
The idea that Dems are humanitarians is comical. They don't do anything unless there is something in it for them. You think they give a crap about blacks? You think they care about Hispanics? Mexicans? Muslims? No. They know that more people living off of the government and more people who think the government is on their side, will forever make this country a one party state.

If Clinton wins, Republicans will never win another election. It won't happen. But what I want to know is who will the Dems blame after 16 years of Obama and Hillary? It won't matter because you know, racism and sexism and xenophobia and "I'll give you free stuff" rebuttals will follow.
 
The idea that Dems are humanitarians is comical. They don't do anything unless there is something in it for them. You think they give a crap about blacks? You think they care about Hispanics? Mexicans? Muslims? No. They know that more people living off of the government and more people who think the government is on their side, will forever make this country a one party state.

If Clinton wins, Republicans will never win another election. It won't happen. But what I want to know is who will the Dems blame after 16 years of Obama and Hillary? It won't matter because you know, racism and sexism and xenophobia and "I'll give you free stuff" rebuttals will follow.
Just saw on tv that we have taken in over 12k Muslims but only 68 Christians. Why? And the states have no power to stop the Feds from importing them. SMH
 
LOL

Trump's ex wife just happened to have copies of their 1995 tax return lying around and leaked it to the NY Times.

Jesus Christ.

I guess there's more evidence for that (since the admin at the CPA firm placed the "sign here" sticker in such a way that it ends up pointing to her line instead of equally pointing to both of theirs) than there is that Russia hacked the DNC.
 
LOL

Trump's ex wife just happened to have copies of their 1995 tax return lying around and leaked it to the NY Times.

Jesus Christ.

I guess there's more evidence for that (since the admin at the CPA firm placed the "sign here" sticker in such a way that it ends up pointing to her line instead of equally pointing to both of theirs) than there is that Russia hacked the DNC.
Kinda surprised that people take such offense to the idea of Maples being the source. I didn't realize that would be so controversial.

Sure, there are probably hundreds of people around NYC who have access to that return, but only two of them could release it without any real chance of getting sued for it, much less imprisoned. Pair that with the fact that the Times conspicuously didn't seek comment from her and that she'd have motive.....well I guess it's just an insane idea.

Is this thing finally over? We now have 4 national polls with coverage into October:

CBS Clinton +6
CNN Clinton +6
NBC Clinton +6
Economist/Yougov Clinton +5

And then the LA Times daily tracking poll, which has Trump +4. And looks for all the world like an outlier.
Stop being such a cuck
 
Kinda surprised that people take such offense to the idea of Maples being the source. I didn't realize that would be so controversial.

Sure, there are probably hundreds of people around NYC who have access to that return, but only two of them could release it without any real chance of getting sued for it, much less imprisoned. Pair that with the fact that the Times conspicuously didn't seek comment from her and that she'd have motive.....well I guess it's just an insane idea.


I don't take offense to the idea of Maples leaking the tax return. I take offense to complete unfounded speculation taken as gospel by the left.

There's more evidence Seth Rich leaked the DNC files than there is that Marla Maples mailed copies of Trump's tax returns to the NYT.
 
What? You mean Hillary is up in every poll where democrats are way more over-sampled than republicans? I'm shocked.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ymmot31
Just saw on tv that we have taken in over 12k Muslims but only 68 Christians. Why? And the states have no power to stop the Feds from importing them. SMH

It's a damn shame because the leftist voters who keep these dickheads in power, are too stupid to see what happens with massive Muslim invasion. Let's see how this ends up working out for all of the feminist, women empowerment & LGBT groups.
 
It's a damn shame because the leftist voters who keep these dickheads in power, are too stupid to see what happens with massive Muslim invasion. Let's see how this ends up working out for all of the feminist, women empowerment & LGBT groups.
A big reason why Hillary must lose. Terror attacks would become monthly and probably even weekly under her.
 
Is this thing finally over? We now have 4 national polls with coverage into October:

CBS Clinton +6
CNN Clinton +6
NBC Clinton +6
Economist/Yougov Clinton +5

And then the LA Times daily tracking poll, which has Trump +4. And looks for all the world like an outlier.

Iirc, those are all only 2 candidate polls. Only valid reason they even exist is to put forth the notion that Clinton is finally closing the door.

That said, I'm sure she's ahead nationally, which is irrelevant. I haven't seen any battleground polls lately, which tells me she isn't polling any better there than before. If she was, the msm would also be touting those non stop
 
  • Like
Reactions: ymmot31
Kinda surprised that people take such offense to the idea of Maples being the source. I didn't realize that would be so controversial.

Sure, there are probably hundreds of people around NYC who have access to that return, but only two of them could release it without any real chance of getting sued for it, much less imprisoned. Pair that with the fact that the Times conspicuously didn't seek comment from her and that she'd have motive.....well I guess it's just an insane idea.
It's just that if Marla did it then there's no conspiracy. Conspiracies are more satisfying, the idea the Clinton's are in collusion with the MSM is something you can sink your teeth into.
 
Lol

I hope you did, man.

I hope Assange was like "ok guys here it is, the truth you've all been waiting for...."

.....

......

flat,800x800,070,f.u1.jpg
Lol I kind of enjoyed staying up late like that. Made me feel like I was in my teens again or something lol.
 
Everybody already assumes the media gets its marching orders from whatever Democratic campaign is in the spotlight...
You may be the only one remotely left of center on here willing to admit/acknowledge that.
 
the Maples theory is a left/right thing? odd.


Are there right leaning posters on here who've gone all in with the theory that Trump's ex wife dug up a tax return from 1995 and snail mailed it to the NY Times with a Trump Tower return address simply because the CPA firm's admin put the sign now sticker at the bottom of the tax return and the arrow points more towards the spouse's name on a return that would have needed to be signed by both people?

I don't really give a shit who mailed it to them.

It's just funny to watch the people who've ignored all the hard evidence of Clinton's criminal activity now float a theory that Trump's ex wife is out to get him based on complete speculation.
 
It's just funny to watch the people who've ignored all the hard evidence of Clinton's criminal activity now float a theory that Trump's ex wife is out to get him based on complete speculation.
Yeah, because the idea of an ex wife doing this to her husband is funny in and of itself. Especially when it's a yoga-practicing, zen buddhism-adhering, gluten-avoiding, anti-GMO vegan former actress.
 
Yeah, because the idea of an ex wife doing this to her husband is funny in and of itself. Especially when it's a yoga-practicing, zen buddhism-adhering, gluten-avoiding, anti-GMO vegan former actress.

It's definitely possible. It's also just as possible it didn't come from her. Maybe more so. If she's trying to strike a lethal blow, why only release this? I'm sure she has more ammo.

I'd say it came from some bank or financial institution where he had to disclose taxes for loans, etc.

Although the IRS, an accounting firm, or some court worker copying these from a sealed filing are all also plausible.

Had to be some reason to hang onto these all this time. Had to be in the normal course of their business. Just don't see it being to damage him. If so, could've been done way earlier in this election or earlier in his career.
 
It's definitely possible. It's also just as possible it didn't come from her. Maybe more so. If she's trying to strike a lethal blow, why only release this? I'm sure she has more ammo.

I'd say it came from some bank or financial institution where he had to disclose taxes for loans, etc.

Although the IRS, an accounting firm, or some court worker copying these from a sealed filing are all also plausible.

Had to be some reason to hang onto these all this time. Had to be in the normal course of their business. Just don't see it being to damage him. If so, could've been done way earlier in this election or earlier in his career.
For sure. People just need to take a deep breath and try to find at least some humor in this nightmarish acid trip of an election cycle. Either Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump is going to be in charge of our nuclear arsenal for the next four years.....if you can't find a way to appreciate some of the hilarity that goes along with this root canal of a process, you might not make it to 2020.
 
More I think about it, it almost certainly came from a court worker.

I remember a story about the nyt trying to unsealed some of trumps divorce records, and both he and Ivana filed briefs opposing.

My guess is, it was a coordinated deal the nyt paid a court worker to just copy the records illegally. That same worker probably has either a verbal or written agreement from the NY ag to not prosecute if her transgression is discovered.

Could be the other avenues i mentioned, but that makes the most sense to me.
 
A big reason why Hillary must lose. Terror attacks would become monthly and probably even weekly under her.
Just like Obama would put us all in FEMA camps and take our guns away right?

The extreme media frenzy on terrorism makes people forget just how bad terrorism was in the 80s. This stuff we've had is a finger prick compared to that. We've been 'surrounded' by Muslims for decades and they still have inflicted fewer casualties than christian or leftist extremists.

Only been 1 major terrorist attack and that happened on your guys watch.
 
Just like Obama would put us all in FEMA camps and take our guns away right?

The extreme media frenzy on terrorism makes people forget just how bad terrorism was in the 80s. This stuff we've had is a finger prick compared to that. We've been 'surrounded' by Muslims for decades and they still have inflicted fewer casualties than christian or leftist extremists.

Only been 1 major terrorist attack and that happened on your guys watch.

There's only been one terrorist attack? San Bernardino, Boston Marathon, Pulse nightclub etc. Those don't count? How has the lib mindset faired over in France?

And in what universe do you live in where Christians are committing more terrorist attacks than Muslims? You don't think the fact that we have guns in the U.S. And that Muslims are vastly outnumbered (for now) has anything to do with the numbers?

You're an idiot. I seriously detest you.
 
We've been 'surrounded' by Muslims for decades and they still have inflicted fewer casualties than christian or leftist extremists.
Sorry cardkilla, I'm just trying to catch up, but what incidents of christian or leftist extremists that have been inflicting casualties on this country? You talking recently (20 or 30 years)?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Willy4UK
He's talking about European terrorism, like the IRA etc...

In the US worse that happens is some idiot bombs olypmics then abortion centers or mails anthrax or leftist anarchist deface Hummers or protest WTO or G7 and peppered whatever...

You Ameros are just more naive than the Euros... Two parts or Europe has had to deal with them since the 7th century, the Iberians and the Balkans and let me tell you, they aren't to be dismissed or taken lightly.
 
This is why I'm so frustrated with how this is being reported. Folks who don't understand tax law and business cycles are swallowing this misrepresentation. Most businesses are cyclical in nature with ups and downs. Farming, real estate, construction, and manufacturing are prime examples. Over the past 30 years, many companies in these industries have experienced losses and profits. The larger a business is, the bigger the numbers are. A billion dollar loss sounds like a insurmountable loss to overcome to most of us. However, for some large companies this is something that can be recovered in a relatively short time. It is common for many successful companies to have loss periods in their past and probably expect some losses to occur at some point in their future.

Those who wrote the tax law understands this reality. It you lose a billion dollars in year 1 and make a billion dollars in year 2, you haven't gained anything over the two year period. Tax law allows you to use the loss from year 1 to offset the profit in year 2 in order to reduce your tax liability. There's nothing sinister about this. NBC is acting like Trump has hired a bunch of slick accountants to pull this off.

No disrespect towards you, Atrian. Many of my friends have been deceived by how this is being portrayed.

No I understand exactly what you are saying. As a small business owner myself, believe me, I understand the cyclical nature of business. To add to Trump's tax issue--the early 90's were a terrible time for commercial real estate, or so I hear.

I get and agree with everything you said. What I was trying to say in my post was that, whether or not it is valid in any way, you know the other side is gonna jump on it and spin it anyway they can. Most people do not understand these things, so they will take advantage of that. And if the shoe were on the other foot, Trump would do the same. It is politics.

In this specific case, exactly what you are talking about is most important. Most people have no idea what any of it means. They will see the headlines and assume he hasn't paid taxes in 20 years and he lost a billion dollars. It is all technically true, but those nuances that you and I may notice get completely glossed over by 90% of people looking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bill - Shy Cat
Only been 1 major terrorist attack and that happened on your guys watch.

Feb. 26, 1993 says "hi", you astonishing, moronic, BOZO! 1300+ lbs. urea nitrate hydrogen gas . . . . killed a 1/2 dozen. Injured more than a thousand. Bill Clinton had been president for a month. Spent the next 7 years and 11 months doing what about it exactly? What? By starting a stand-off with the Branch Davidians in Waco, Texas two days later and then burning all of them to the ground 51 days after that. It wouldn't surprise me if all of the other posters on this thread told you that you suck. I'll do my best to keep that from happening but I can't make any promises.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Willy4UK
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT