POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
Hillary is saying Trump and his supporters are racists that hate blacks and mexicans. Shes became desperate. And idiots say its the right that fear mongers. No one fear mongers more than her.
August 16 - CNN's media critic (@reliablesources/brian stelter) says it's "reckless" for Sean Hannity to speculate about Hillary's health.
August 24 - CNN's Sanjay Gupta writes a piece speculating that Trump is at high risk for heart disease.
heh.
August 24 - CNN's Sanjay Gupta writes a piece speculating that Trump is at high risk for heart disease.
heh.
Speaking of Hillarys health, I saw Dr. Drew is losing its own show. I'm sure it has nothing to do with saying Hillarys health is in grave danger. Just a total coincidence I'm sure.
Trump extended his electoral lead in the latest USA wide polls. These reports are based on polls from all states for the 2016 presidential election between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.. Where possible, the liberal bias has been taken out the polling methodology.
Saw a tweet from a CNN reporter the other day condemning reports on Rudy's comments on Hillary's health. Said when she was in school, they were taught not to report on conspiracies.
I really thought that was hilarious, given all the baseless Trump stories ive seen. Especially, but not limited to, his alliance with Russia.
Trump extended his electoral lead in the latest USA wide polls. These reports are based on polls from all states for the 2016 presidential election between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.. Where possible, the liberal bias has been taken out the polling methodology.
No way I believe that poll. Id love to be wrong,
He is starting to ignore direct question and posting more pictures or clever little comments. He knows the truth, just won't admit it.
the "Donald raped ex-wife Ivana" stories are cocked & locked for October 17th
If there was any doubt critics were going to love the Barry/Michelle love story movie, read this via the HL via the SF Chron:
The community meeting scene, in which Obama, then 28, fills a roomful of disappointed citizens with hope, is a tour de force. Obama’s audience starts off angry that their request for a community center has been turned down by the city government. But then Obama invites the audience to let go of anger and judgment and to imagine the city’s rationale. Their goal, he says, is to “turn self-interest into mutual interest.”
This is the movie’s equivalent of the scene in John Ford’s “Young Mr. Lincoln,” in which the future president turns away a lynch mob through the force of reason. The community scene is the moment when the audience thinks, “There’s the president in miniature.” And it has the same effect as the “Young Mr. Lincoln” lynch mob scene: Goosebumps.
The community meeting scene, in which Obama, then 28, fills a roomful of disappointed citizens with hope, is a tour de force. Obama’s audience starts off angry that their request for a community center has been turned down by the city government. But then Obama invites the audience to let go of anger and judgment and to imagine the city’s rationale. Their goal, he says, is to “turn self-interest into mutual interest.”
This is the movie’s equivalent of the scene in John Ford’s “Young Mr. Lincoln,” in which the future president turns away a lynch mob through the force of reason. The community scene is the moment when the audience thinks, “There’s the president in miniature.” And it has the same effect as the “Young Mr. Lincoln” lynch mob scene: Goosebumps.
It's not lowering standards. If company A has a patent on one compound, yet a mixture of compound b & c produce the same effect as compound A, the government shouldn't say, well only A can be used. Just that's one example. Stop pretending like government ever has some kind of logical, competent thinking.
What? A couple of witty verses from Samuel Clemens doesn't speak the nature of today's political climate????? I'm shocked.
If youre over 16 years old, your life has been wasted. Could be the dumbest person ive ever conversated with. Your own dumbass dems literally admitted it. And youre STILL trying to spin it.
I think there are some glaring parts of my life that have been wasted. If I'm the dumbest person you've ever conversated with, though, I sincerely regret the change.
Did you even read the link you posted? One of those EpiPen competitors had an increased failure rate. Do you, as a consumer, wanna buy an EpiPen "equivalent" for your kid without knowing it has a higher failure rate? This isn't a flashlight or dishwasher.
The FDA has many faults, but letting sh*tty drugs on the market is the exception, not the rule.
It doesn't sound like you've listened to his latest statements or realize he is formally changing his stance.
You also obviously don't know much about the visa program if you believe "all illegals would have to leave, then apply for a visa".
I challenge you to find where in his interview with Hannity last night where he said "all illegals would have to leave". He said nothing of the kind.
"Let me go a step further- they'll pay back-taxes, they have to pay taxes, there's no amnesty, as such, there's no amnesty, but we work with them," Trump said.
He also spoke of how hard it would be to deport people who have lived in the country for decades and raised a family.
"Now, everybody agrees we get the bad ones out," Trump said. "But when I go through and I meet thousands and thousands of people on this subject, and I've had very strong people come up to me, really great, great people come up to me, and they've said, 'Mr. Trump, I love you, but to take a person who's been here for 15 or 20 years and throw them and their family out, it's so tough, Mr. Trump,' I have it all the time! It's a very, very hard thing."
He added that he is expected to announce a decision on his stance regarding illegal immigration "very soon".
He may yet change his position. But he hasn't yet. The stance released last week was that illegals must leave, and apply for visas; then they'll be welcomed back.
If there's been an actual change, I haven't seen it. This is the same stance, just expounding on it.
I've seen it for at least 10 years and since I'm usually late to any intellectual party I have to assume it had been around for quite awhile before I picked up on it.
Can I get an Amen! for the U of Chicago? Sent a letter to incoming freshmen to say:
“Our commitment to academic freedom means that we do not support so-called ‘trigger warnings,’ we do not cancel invited speakers because their topics might prove controversial, and we do not condone the creation of intellectual ‘safe spaces’ where individuals can retreat from ideas and perspectives at odds with their own.”
per USAToday.com.......
“Our commitment to academic freedom means that we do not support so-called ‘trigger warnings,’ we do not cancel invited speakers because their topics might prove controversial, and we do not condone the creation of intellectual ‘safe spaces’ where individuals can retreat from ideas and perspectives at odds with their own.”
per USAToday.com.......
Read about that today. That was great to hear. Little pussy millennials. These millennial softies don't even have the same gripping strength as a young strappin' male of the mid 1980s.
What flaccid little wimps.
The comments I posted were from last night.
If you're welcoming them back then why make them leave? They can apply for a visa from anywhere.
If you have to leave, why would you pay back taxes? Just leave, apply for the visa and come on in.
If you've heard him change positions time after time, why would you trust him to let you back in once he got you out?
...and as I said, you don't really know much about the visa process. It is a process that can take months...can you imagine the backlog with the influx of 11 million applications?, a process that requires an employer sponsor the applicant or the applicant have "special skills" to receive a work visa. Or consider that many who have been here for years wouldn't have a place to return to...nor have the means to return "home" for an unknown period of time waiting on your visa application...
It is so very impractical which is why even Trump's own people are telling him it was an unworkable solution. It sounds good, sounds easy but is next to impossible to actually do.
You can be guaranteed that if ever Trump was actually put into a position to set the policy that it would be a duplicate of every other amnesty program for illegal workers that has been enacted since 1980. They will be required to pay a fine and back taxes (that will never be collected) and given legal status.
Kinda like Hillary wasn't for the war, but she was? Or was it that she for it and then wasn't for it? Hard to keep up with her.
"Why make them do that" wasn't the issue. The issue was whether his stance has been consistent. So far, it has.
No mass deportations now. Major change. Pity Ann Coulter whose book praising mass deportations was published today.
Breitbart is a conservative website. That's all. It's not white nationalist. If you think it is, then you probably would the same of Townhall, Fox News, the New York Post, or any conservative media. And, come to think of it, you probably do. You are clearly a SJW. And it is just not possible to have a reasoned discussion with a SJW. Therefore, blocked.
How did she come up with "super predator", anyway? Is there any discernible difference between a "super predator" and a run of the mill predator? Does a "super predator" have super powers?
Last edited:
There should be a way for all illegal's to gain status. Yes, they should pay back taxes as well.
As for it being impractical to deport all illegals, it's been done, not once, but twice. We have made many technological advancements and transportation advancements since the first and second mass deportation...I'm sure it could be done again. People are relocated all the damn time due to natural disasters, or conflict, so spare me the "not having a place", bs.
Kinda like Hillary wasn't for the war, but she was? Or was it that she for it and then wasn't for it? Hard to keep up with her.
Her stance on the issue depends completely on who she is talking to, how much she can get for the chosen view, and how many votes she can collect.
She learned from the 2008 election how to better flip the flop
