Basically, your phrasing was the exact way I'd expect to see it from Defense/Fuzz/Cardkilla/etc.
Never called it a war on women or remotely implied it. I don't trivialize people's ethical opposition to the practice and I understand why it rises to the level of a "single issue voter" topic.I think it's incredibly different.
If you want to kill babies, that's fine, you have the legal right to do that.
Just don't try and spin it into some war on women bullshit by implying those that don't support abortion are against a "woman's right to make her own health decisions."
There are far more factors in play that a woman making health decisions.
since Uncle Sam is footing the bills, hello death panel!How about end-of-life health care decisions? Should Uncle Sam get involved in those to make sure family members aren't "murdering" loved ones? Or is that a personal, private, and individual matter that should be confined to the exam room?
I think if the loved one isn't able to sustain himself without the help of others, or isn't viable if you will, the people he'd depend upon should have the option to hack him into pieces and sell his organs.
Willy, you mentioned the religious right (again). Why is this a religious issue? If I take a bat to pregnant woman's womb and kill her baby, I'm going to jail, for assault as well as murder IMO.
What is the difference really? Baby is dead either way, just depends on who has the right to kill it.
Not sure what you are getting at. The law calls the shots, not pro-lifers.
You don't know what the touch you're talking about. My Satanic Cooking Classics has no such restrictions on age of organs used in the recipes.Only problem is harvesting the good organs. Most will be useless and no one wants a 85 yr old kidney.
And fetal masturbation. Can't forget that.Two things lacking from this discussion:
1. Images of destroyed fetuses
2. Dubious claims about fetal physiology and motor control.
Rhetorical hyperbole, false equivalence fallacy, and indignant rage are waiting for the rest of their friends to join the reunion
Yeah, way to try and deflect the question....and give me a f^@kin break about "death panels". Your insurance carrier and mine make those same frickin decisions for people every day. Add the fact that those same people are TPAs for Uncle Sam. Private insurance carriers have a much bigger incentive to see you die than does Uncle Sam. I work for one of those carriers and see it every fricken day.since Uncle Sam is footing the bills, hello death panel!
Then you should be all for it. We'd already be full-bore communist now had all those babies been born.studies show aborted babies come from the liberal democrat segment of American society....female(as in the baby, not the one doin' the abortin'), poor, minority. If y'all are OK vacuuming out future voters then have fun with all that.
Then you should be all for it. We'd already be full-bore communist now had all those babies been born.
Funny though...in college it was the daughters of the Republican dads who was sending Susie out of state for a few days to "take care of a few problems". Nothing was going to get in the way of that white wedding a year or two down the road.
Who hasn't regretted decisions in their life?Your mother decided to have you as well as the mothers of others on this board. I guess you are okay with babies not being born. I am sure that there are a lot of women who have regretted their decision to abort babies. In fact, the woman who PP used to file their lawsuit has come out against abortion and is, in fact, a pro-lifer now.
"Maybe"?Those who think/thought abortion is "ok", usually think abortion is nothing more than removing a mass, an unwanted growth. But when they see that organs and body parts are useful then that makes them realize maybe it really is a baby.
Yeah, way to try and deflect the question....and give me a f^@kin break about "death panels". Your insurance carrier and mine make those same frickin decisions for people every day. Add the fact that those same people are TPAs for Uncle Sam. Private insurance carriers have a much bigger incentive to see you die than does Uncle Sam. I work for one of those carriers and see it every fricken day.
Why is it that "we" see as the ethical thing to do when the family pet is terminally ill and suffering is to end it's life in a humane way but we don't view having the same respect for our ageing parents when they have the same prognosis?
As a person who has lost both parents as well as my mother-in-law to Alzheimer's...and having had the discussions with all three long before their demise, having had same discussion with my children as well as my father-in-law, it is borderline cruel to force people to simply exist until the disease finally causes death. Let's not even discuss the $100,000's in medical and nursing home costs that are thrust upon the families. There are plenty of safeguards that could be put in place to insure that all parties agree to what is to happen, most importantly, the patient.
No, let's protect the pockets of the nursing home operators who warehouse these bodies and try to suck every last penny out of their savings as well as those of the taxpayers.
I just gave my first likeFor once in my life I agree with Defense. He should be euthanized.
You don't know what the touch you're talking about. My Satanic Cooking Classics has no such restrictions on age of organs used in the recipes.
The law and life should not be at odds, IMO. It's about principle for me, I guess.
All of that "free care" was passed over the objections of the very block of people who are opposed to abortion...right wing Republicans.Noone cares about kids once they are born? What a tonnage of horseshit. Free health care from the federal government from birth until adulthood for kids born in this country. Free public education. Free lunch programs. Waiting lists out the door for wonderful parents who want to adopt and raise unwanted kids.
To try and pound out a couple of hysterical paragraphs weaving out a fantasy world that life for kids in this country is Oliver Twist "may I have more?" is the biggest pile ever plopped on this website.
You guys haven't settle this abortion issue yet? Come on, looks like you've been at it most of the day. How long can it take?
This is a little surprising to me:
Liberals have won a series of victories on social issues. Most Americans aren’t thrilled about it.“Liberals’ have won a string of victories on gay marriage and health care reform this year, but a new Washington Post-ABC News poll finds a large majority of Americans are unhappy with where the nation is headed on social issues. Sixty three percent of people say they are uncomfortable with the country’s overall direction on social issues these days; four in 10 feel ‘strongly’ uncomfortable about the nation’s changes. . . . What appeared to be overwhelming wins for President Obama in June and July are not resonating with his base quite as soundly as may have been expected.
You can't vote on people's rights. That is why those state laws get struck down.Because un-elected Judges are making law. They are over turning legal states voter ballots. Voters in states have voted and passed state constitutional law, which has been over turned by Judges, all federal, including SCOTUS. So Judges are making laws, not duly elected lawmakers and voters. This, is what started the Civil War, states rights issues. Some could say it was slavery, but slavery was a side bar.
It is kind of odd to me that abortion is such a huge debate and yet once the child is born no one seems to care too much what happens to them. There are over 500,000 kids in foster care in this country right this very instant. Many of them were abused and neglected. In about a 5 year period roughly 20,000 children will die from abuse or neglect, most of them before their 5th birthday. About 20,000 kids age out of foster care every year and a large percentage of those kids become homeless for at least some period after ageing out.
This, is what started the Civil War, states rights issues. Some could say it was slavery, but slavery was a side bar.
But you see. This is where it gets finicky. It's your perception that you think is the correct perception.
The decision has been decided in court. It will never change. But if you feel that passionately, go out and protest it man. But no matter how many pro-lifers fight it, argue it, or contest it. It will not change unless the science learns more about where life begins. You say it say it starts from onset, I don't. It sounds like pro-lifers need to channel some of their aggression into science to change the current understanding on life and abortion. Wouldn't that be ironic?
organic cell division. as in the budding plant. interrupt it unnaturally. that is killing. To the man or woman who wants that to the unborn child that could be his and hers: Do It. Just Do It and shut your damn mouth. But don't blow smoke up my ass and say it ain't killing.