POLITICAL THREAD

[Supreme Lord Z]

Trump's exact quote:

"If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks, although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don’t know.”

If Hillary is picking judges then that means she is already elected. Trump is not talking about voting. He's talking about shooting. There is no two ways around that.

 

[BostonCat2001]

Trump's exact quote:

"If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks, although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don’t know.”

If Hillary is picking judges then that means she is already elected. Trump is not talking about voting. He's talking about shooting. There is no two ways around that.

trump was clearly talking about what what could be done AFTER clinton was elected and appointed judges.

but like trump said...he can shoot a guy and his numbers would go up. and he needs his numbers to go up...sound that dog whistle

 

[Teachable Moe]

Confident enough to put money on that?

No

 

[Supreme Lord Z]

If Trump quits as I have predicted then Paul Ryan will be who they replace him with. I've already explained this. Ryan is already 3rd in line to be President. They have the rationale in place to put him on the ticket and to be honest, if he had enough time he would win. Easily.

 

[screwduke1]

Seth Rich, murdered DNC staffer, was the hacker per Assange.

 

[bigblueinsanity]

Huma abedin. The only person in the world as shady as the clintons. Maybe moreso. Can't wait to have them running the country!

 

[morgousky]

How many dead bodies surround Clinton elections now? 4?

As far as the second amendment, she better watch herself. Could be political suicide trying to take that American right. Gun owners take our rights extremely serious. Of all the games liberals like to play that one would cause the people to infest in the streets. The right will not be taken, and the guns will not be confiscated. A law ordering it would be denied and ignored. Come take them if you want to try, but they will have no one to enforce it.

 

[YourPublicEnemy]

Seth Rich, murdered DNC staffer, was the hacker per Assange.

The guy that was murdered in a suspected robbery despite nothing being taken?

BTW, how dumb do you have to be to support Hillary and the trail of corruption and bodies that have surrounded her?

 

[morgousky]

History will look back and the new symbol of freedom will just sth at any free person willing to allow the government to take their firearms of any kind. How historically dumb do you have to be?

 

[screwduke1]

4 murders by the Clintons in the last month and we still have 3 months til the election. Who is next on the kill list?

 

[screwduke1]

I know one thing, if I were a staffer on Bernies campaign I would be watching my back non stop.

 

[YourPublicEnemy]

There's nearly 50 suspicious deaths around the Clintons that come to mind. No one has that many people around them die like that. No one.

History will look back and the new symbol of freedom will just sth at any free person willing to allow the government to take their firearms of any kind. How historically dumb do you have to be?

I think history will look back on this group of radicals on the left, the same they look back on Nazis and the Soviet Union. Those of us who just stood by and were taken over will be a cautionary tale for others in the future.

I don't believe either side has noble politicians but I think today's Democratic Party, their media and the radicals on that side are pure evil. When did that party get hijacked by crazies?

 

[morgousky]

There's nearly 50 suspicious deaths around the Clintons that come to mind. No one has that many people around them die like that. No one.



I think history will look back on this group of radicals on the left, the same they look back on Nazis and the Soviet Union. Those of us who just stood by and were taken over will be a cautionary tale for others in the future.

I don't believe either side has noble politicians but I think today's Democratic Party, their media and the radicals on that side are pure evil. When did that party get hijacked by crazies?

They've been trying to radicalize for generations but the populous was too smart and kept the politicians in somewhat control. The last two decades of educational indoctrination, the liberal destruction of the traditional family, and creating incentive based minority voters are how this happened. When the next free civilization of free people look at our model, they will see exactly what how to and how not to operate. We've given the blueprints for both.

 

[morgousky]

Also the communist party and sympathizers got smart and changed their name to "progressives". This helped them lose the stigma attached to the name of what they really are.

A socialist liberal is nothing more than a communist in a suit.

 

[Bill Derington]

You know, these are the kinds of issues that are thrashed out in trade treaties.

Sure it is, I'm sure China will get right on it.
Mexico is a good indicator of what free trade is about, we were told it would lift Mexico up to our standards. The good paying jobs would enable Mexican citizens the ability to buy American products. 20 years later illegal immigration is as bad as ever, the tire plant in TN Gore spoke of has closed and moved to Mexico, and their standard of living is the same as ever. Kind of like that other businessman fighting it then tried to forewarn us about.
You're smarter than this Moe, we are sold a bunch of BS so we'll go along, and then the billionaires supporting Hillary rake in the profits while the average worker loses his job.

 

[Bill Derington]

Hillary's scandles are covered by the media until the story has run its course. Trump constantly provides the media with new scandal, new stupidity. Once it runs its course, he provides something new. You guys seem to want the media to continue to rehash years old stories over and over. They aren't talking about what Trump did years ago, it's about what he said today.

What he said today was nothing, he wasn't telling the people to assassinate Hillary, he was telling them to stand up to her, my god the level of scrutiny placed on him is ridiculous.
Hillary said and I quote she was going to raise the taxes on the middle class, that was her words. Common sense tells me that isn't what she meant to say, and the media treated as such. You know as well as I do if Trump had said that it would've been front page on every news site, that level of double standard is scary.
Does it not trouble any of you when the media is ignoring the transgressions of one candidate and pushing an image of another? That is dangerous

 

[Bill Derington]

Trump's exact quote:

"If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks, although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don’t know.”

If Hillary is picking judges then that means she is already elected. Trump is not talking about voting. He's talking about shooting. There is no two ways around that.

Why do we have the second amendment Z?

 

[morgousky]

Why do we have the second amendment Z?

That's like asking a Muslim why Jesus died on the cross.

 

[UPSCat4080]

Trump's exact quote:

"If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks, although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don’t know.”

If Hillary is picking judges then that means she is already elected. Trump is not talking about voting. He's talking about shooting. There is no two ways around that.

Trump was not talking about shooting Hillary...quit being an idiot. I also at the time of hearing it did not think he meant mass voting either. What I believed he meant was that when Hillary's justices make it legal to abolish the second amendment then gun owners could stand up and refuse to give them up. We have the second amendment to protect us from people who want to harm us, but also to defend ourselves against any people who want to trespass on our lands and take away our freedoms...government included.

"The Founding Fathers, having just broken away from Great Britain, understood the new federal government they were ratifying might one day become just as tyrannical. If it had the authority to control citizen access to firearms, then it could disarm them, just as the British attempted to do. This would make any attempts to restore liberties futile. The Second Amendment was specifically included in the Bill of Rights to prevent this."

Only dishonest pieces of crap are trying to spin this as Trump insinuating that someone should shoot Hillary. But by all means...continue to make yourself look like a jackass.

 

[screwduke1]

What he said today was nothing, he wasn't telling the people to assassinate Hillary, he was telling them to stand up to her, my god the level of scrutiny placed on him is ridiculous.
Hillary said and I quote she was going to raise the taxes on the middle class, that was her words. Common sense tells me that isn't what she meant to say, and the media treated as such. You know as well as I do if Trump had said that it would've been front page on every news site, that level of double standard is scary.
Does it not trouble any of you when the media is ignoring the transgressions of one candidate and pushing an image of another? That is dangerous

Truth be told, Obama could declare a 3rd term and have all conservatives and christians thrown in prison and the media would defend it. Its very dangerous what the media is doing.

 

[CatFromDaHood]

Sure I would, but I don't know what that has to do with Trumps comments. They aren't even similar.

I'm actually afraid you MAY be telling the truth. Wow....I feel so sorry for you.

 

[screwduke1]

I'm actually afraid you MAY be telling the truth. Wow....I feel so sorry for you.

Yeah, cause a Trump saying 2nd amendment supporters wouldn't be happy with Hillarys pick for judges is certainly the same thing as someone flat out saying they want to murder Trump.

 

[morgousky]

This is what kills me about the second amendment stance of the left, and the sheep that follow them that don't understand simple concepts.

You will never stop rich men from owning firearms. Rich men can buy anything they want. They can own tanks, machine guns, full auto rifles and handguns etc. all you need is a "good boy network (as simple as getting your head law enforcement officer to sign off) and the funds. Presto. You now own fully militarized weapons. I wonder if these officers will reject the rich boys in their towns for that assault rifle?)There is no law keeping the wealthy from owning just about anything they want minus very few destructive classifications, and if they've got enough money they can get around that by simply becoming an FFL and using it for personal use. Period.

But the anti-gun treason lobby doesn't even know proper terminology of weapons. They just recite talking points. They don't realize gun legislation only creates the haves and have nots. So what they're saying is, middle class and the poor are not responsible enough to own even a simple semi-automatic rifle. They're not responsible enough to own magazines over a certain limit. They're not responsible enough to have the weapons that rich "white men" enjoy. They help create legislation that only allows the rich and powerful the rights.

Liberals, do all of us a favor and study up on classification of weapons and laws that allow certain uses. You're arguing a point you've got no f'ing clue about, and you know it. You're only keeping the weapons from average Americans, and giving the rich more and more power. This is a fact, so before arguing your regurgitated propaganda, do us a favor and think for yourselves for the first time in your existence. How about a little truth and admit you didn't realize any of that at all? I know some of you aren't this stupid in real life. You think it's ethical and wise to only allow your government, law enforcement, and the powerful rich to own weapons that can control you and your family? Please, let's hear the spin on this one?

For the love of Jesus Mary and Joseph, get some knowledge on this crap.

 

[morgousky]

My son butchered the Kings English in school all day. Thinking of asking for legislation of banning the pencils so this shit stops.

 

[YourPublicEnemy]

Trump has to win. I don't think any of us conservatives would have picked him as "the guy" or "ideal" by any measure but to save this country, he has to win. This saves the Supreme Court, saves the second amendment and puts a halt to Muslims and illegals flooding this country for the time being not to mention it will save this country from being handed to the most corrupt politician of our lifetimes.

There's no other shot right now. 2020 isn't producing a Republican candidate that will win. The demographics won't be there. You don't come back from 12-16 years of Obama/Hillary. People need to wake the hell up.

By the way, we know the left is so far gone from any level of decency but what I want to know is how can any impartial observer think they should back Clinton and the Dems?
-You have George Soros, Warren Buffett, Google's Eric Schmidt, huge hedge funds backing Hillary.
-You have a proven corrupt media pushing her and trying to protect her
-You have DNC leaked emails showing how crooked the party is
-You have hired protestors causing havoc on their behalf
-You have PC speech codes and SJWs constantly crying
-You have BLM and Muslims/terrorism being empowered by the left
-Illegal immigration out of control
-Suspicious deaths, proven lies about her email server
-A sham Clinton Foundation that is pay to play and gets donations from Muslim nations and an administration who wants to take away the second amendment.


How the hell could you back that as a sane and normal individual? How could you trust that? You have so much evidence that shows the character of this group and you'd vote for this? Are people that brainwashed?

 

[morgousky]

Trump has to win. I don't think any of us conservatives would have picked him as "the guy" or "ideal" by any measure but to save this country, he has to win. This saves the Supreme Court, saves the second amendment and puts a halt to Muslims and illegals flooding this country for the time being not to mention it will save this country from being handed to the most corrupt politician of our lifetimes.

There's no other shot right now. 2020 isn't producing a Republican candidate that will win. The demographics won't be there. You don't come back from 12-16 years of Obama/Hillary. People need to wake the hell up.

By the way, we know the left is so far gone from any level of decency but what I want to know is how can any impartial observer think they should back Clinton and the Dems?
-You have George Soros, Warren Buffett, Google's Eric Schmidt, huge hedge funds backing Hillary.
-You have a proven corrupt media pushing her and trying to protect her
-You have DNC leaked emails showing how crooked the party is
-You have hired protestors causing havoc on their behalf
-You have PC speech codes and SJWs constantly crying
-You have BLM and Muslims/terrorism being empowered by the left
-Illegal immigration out of control
-Suspicious deaths, proven lies about her email server
-A sham Clinton Foundation that is pay to play and gets donations from Muslim nations and an administration who wants to take away the second amendment.


How the hell could you back that as a sane and normal individual? How could you trust that? You have so much evidence that shows the character of this group and you'd vote for this? Are people that brainwashed?

It just shows what some of us have known all along, especially last election cycle with the vilification of Mitt Romney. Liberals aren't really principled, they care about the institution that is the promotion of an anti-traditional American platform. The ones who aren't, just like to put a "W" in the win column for the party they've been either brainwashed into believing, or the party mommy and daddy told them to vote for. It's really that simple, and voting for a person (loose term) like Clinton just shows that reality. This is why I will go to the grave believing what conservative black voices have been saying about liberals in general. They are really the most racist of the bunch. What's the old saying? whoever smelled it delt it? It's the same philosophy. Usually the first white person to scream racism is in fact the racist from the jump.They have created terms to describe black conservatives who left their plantation as "uncle toms". Conserative women are hit harder than any group in this country and called whores, *****, and other derogatory names.

They aren't principled, they don't care about minorities, they don't really care about women or anyone else. The democratic party has become a machine, and its all about pumping votes for political power. All of this other crap is just that, bullshit.

 

[Levibooty]

So the GOP has been beating on Hillary Clinton for 35 years and she is still standing up and fighting back. Kind of a wow there. Still if they are right that she is a liar, I'm left with the choice of a competent strong liar and a nincompoop liar that can't string words together in a way that is lucid or non-incendiary.

Not really a hard choice given the demands of the job.

 

[AlbanyWildCat]

So the GOP has been beating on Hillary Clinton for 35 years and she is still standing up and fighting back. Kind of a wow there. Still if they are right that she is a liar, I'm left with the choice of a competent strong liar and a nincompoop liar that can't string words together in a way that is lucid or non-incendiary.

Not really a hard choice given the demands of the job.

It really either shows how weak the Republicans have become or how weak their "issues" with Hillary really are with the general public.

 

[mdlUK.1]

So the GOP has been beating on Hillary Clinton for 35 years and she is still standing up and fighting back. Kind of a wow there. Still if they are right that she is a liar, I'm left with the choice of a competent strong liar and a nincompoop liar that can't string words together in a way that is lucid or non-incendiary.

Not really a hard choice given the demands of the job.

A nincompoop that has created thousands of jobs and amassed great wealth or a career politician that can't stop lying and created zero jobs?

You're right, not a hard choice.

 

[BernieSadori]

It was the Russians!

Welp, that's apparently false. It was the DNC staffer that was murdered.

 

[BernieSadori]

Serious question, what makes Hillary competent?

What successful operation, outside of a campaign, has she put together that has made our country stronger?

This isn't about Trump...he has his own set of issues.

 

[AlbanyWildCat]

Trump was not talking about shooting Hillary...quit being an idiot. I also at the time of hearing it did not think he meant mass voting either. What I believed he meant was that when Hillary's justices make it legal to abolish the second amendment then gun owners could stand up and refuse to give them up. We have the second amendment to protect us from people who want to harm us, but also to defend ourselves against any people who want to trespass on our lands and take away our freedoms...government included.

"The Founding Fathers, having just broken away from Great Britain, understood the new federal government they were ratifying might one day become just as tyrannical. If it had the authority to control citizen access to firearms, then it could disarm them, just as the British attempted to do. This would make any attempts to restore liberties futile. The Second Amendment was specifically included in the Bill of Rights to prevent this."

Only dishonest pieces of crap are trying to spin this as Trump insinuating that someone should shoot Hillary. But by all means...continue to make yourself look like a jackass.

As an old boss use to tell me...you are responsible for what you say as well as what people hear.

 

[anon_l8pbkn96tg3j6]

What the everliving****? Murdered Seth Rich was wikileaks' source? This election has obviously made me insane.

 

[AustinTXCat]

Has anyone here actually looked objectively at campaign websites for the candidates? Please take a moment and glance at the respective issues for each.

Hillary

Donald

Donald uses lots of space defending Trump University in two places and raising suspicions, in my opinion. I'm not seeing similar defenses for cattle futures or Webb Hubble or Email-gate, etc.

Small observation. Just saying.

 

[Bill Derington]

So the GOP has been beating on Hillary Clinton for 35 years and she is still standing up and fighting back. Kind of a wow there. Still if they are right that she is a liar, I'm left with the choice of a competent strong liar and a nincompoop liar that can't string words together in a way that is lucid or non-incendiary.

Not really a hard choice given the demands of the job.

You're right, she is competent and strong at lying.

Hell, her own people know she can't think on the spot, thats why she DOESN'T do press conference's or even acknowledge reporters when they ask a question she hasn't scripted.

 

[Bill Derington]

It was the Russians!

Welp, that's apparently false. It was the DNC staffer that was murdered.

That will get zero play on mainstream media, guaranteed.

 

[Mashburned]

"The Founding Fathers, having just broken away from Great Britain, understood the new federal government they were ratifying might one day become just as tyrannical. If it had the authority to control citizen access to firearms, then it could disarm them, just as the British attempted to do. This would make any attempts to restore liberties futile. The Second Amendment was specifically included in the Bill of Rights to prevent this."

Only dishonest pieces of crap are trying to spin this as Trump insinuating that someone should shoot Hillary. But by all means...continue to make yourself look like a jackass.

??????

Trump said that?

 

[Mashburned]

Nvm, saw what he actually said..lmao.

Meanwhile, mf'ers are being shot in the back in DC! That just so happen to have ties to Hillary and Julian Asange. That's crazy.

Our media is basically...

That's Al Roker, fyi

 

[Bill Cosby]

Clinton having Seth Rich murdered really is too obvious.

I think Assange is playing everyone.

 

[Bill Cosby]

Can't wait to hear the media do their duty and ask the Clinton campaign about Assange.

"We know Seth Rich died in a poorly executed robbery whereby the robbers didn't get his wallet, cell phone or watch, but Julian Assange was on Dutch TV insinuating he was the leak of the DNC emails as opposed to Russia who obviously leaked them. Why would Julian Assange lie?"