It [negotiating return of hostages] is grounds for impeachment.
![giphy.gif](/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.giphy.com%2Fmedia%2F2LQn6WYertVxm%2Fgiphy.gif&hash=ae0cbe5ba221aee0a4d79ae6a4398345)
It [negotiating return of hostages] is grounds for impeachment.
I think our nation is so weak and so controlled by the media. It doesn't matter what comes out about Obama or Hillary. Their voter base simply doesn't care and they're not informed enough for that type of news to affect them.
They would be more focused on some soundbite that Trump said or just remember what John Stewart or John Oliver said about him.
Let's face it. In today's world, the media is going to get the result it wants. When you have that much influence (media, Hollywood,academia) and the constant pandering to every special interest group that isn't middle America or white male, the deck is too stacked. Plus, we're too comfortable to really make any noise or hold politicians accountable.
This country is done. It's just a matter of time.
It's amazing you don't have the foresight to see what type of additional harm this puts service men/women in that are stationed abroad.
We don't negotiate the release because we think it's a sign of weakness, it's because it opens the door for the abduction of military members all over the globe.
It really is wild how so many people can be manipulated into believing total BS. Independent thinking is a lost concept. Reminds me of an episode of brain games regarding social conformity.
Yup. This puts not only a target on the backs of our heroes overseas, but theres now a huge money sign beside that target. Don't expect a hillary shill like Moe to understand.It's amazing you don't have the foresight to see what type of additional harm this puts service men/women in that are stationed abroad.
We don't negotiate the release because we think it's a sign of weakness, it's because it opens the door for the abduction of military members all over the globe.
We don't negotiate the release of prisoners? Since when?
Would love to know the charges and sentences for all 214 of them.
I'm sure there was an outcry on here about the prisoners in Iran and I'm sure Obama was blamed for not doing enough. He pulled a Reagan, except cash, not weapons.
They're probably black
I think we should focus more on the Iran cash deal. You all seem to have a solid grasp on the situation.
And green energy plants that go belly up after 3-5 years.Totally agree Mime. There are two areas where Obama will spend cash. Iran and clunkers.
Would love to know the charges and sentences for all 214 of them.
And green energy plants that go belly up after 3-5 years.
To be fair, Almost all of them were drug sentences that were under mandatory sentencing guidelines. The sentences were shortened, not pardoned so they wouldn't have any voting rights.
It's not the governments job to pump millions into one sector of the market while attacking another. Green energy has proven to be nothing more than a fantasy. How many windmills and solar panels would it take to run one household for a year?Because support for green energy was such a ludicrous objective:
![]()
It's not the governments job to pump millions into one sector of the market while attacking another. Green energy has proven to be nothing more than a fantasy. How many windmills and solar panels would it take to run one household for a year?
It's not the governments job to pump millions into one sector of the market while attacking another. Green energy has proven to be nothing more than a fantasy. How many windmills and solar panels would it take to run one household for a year?
And green energy plants that go belly up after 3-5 years.
So, the government support for transportation from the Erie Canal to the railroads to the interstate highways was over-reach?
Fantasy? It's cheaper now than coal.
It's not the governments job to pump millions into one sector of the market while attacking another. Green energy has proven to be nothing more than a fantasy. How many windmills and solar panels would it take to run one household for a year?
A better example would be trying to convince people today the Eerie canal is a better, more cost effective form of transportation than the interstate. And then taxing the hell out of them for using the interstate while paying them to use the canal.
So, the government support for transportation from the Erie Canal to the railroads to the interstate highways was over-reach?
Fantasy? It's cheaper now than coal.
You saying conventional energy sources don't currently receive state and federal subsidies?
The government should not overstep in matters of personal choice in such things as energy. Throwing money at failing green companies was a bad investment and something that shouldn't have been done, or at least done differently.
Understood. So fed and state govt's should remove the preferential tax treatment granted to oil & gas industries, as well as the subsidization of the distribution network that supports said industries. I think we're all clear now.
I didn't say that, I said the only reason Solar is a viable option is because the Govt has made it so by providing huge incentives, and making coal almost unable to use.