Coming your way in November. Trump will stand trial for fraud under the RICO code re: Trump University. From the Wall Street Journal. (My paid subscription.)
Judge Curiel Allows Trump University Case to Continue to Trial
Judge who was criticized by Trump also bars public release of video depositions by candidate
By Brent Kendall
The Wall Street Journal
Aug. 2, 2016 11:50 p.m. ET
The federal judge who has come under fire from Republican presidential candidate
Donald Trump on Tuesday refused to throw out a civil case alleging fraud at Trump University. But he also sided with Mr. Trump on one issue by barring the public release of videotaped testimony given by Mr. Trump in the case.
The rulings represented a mixed bag for Mr. Trump, who created a firestorm in June when he said U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel had “
an absolute conflict” in presiding over the litigation given that he was “of Mexican heritage” and the Republican nominee had made a strong pledge to seal the southern U.S. border.
Judge Curiel, based in San Diego, is presiding over a pair of cases against Mr. Trump in which students alleged they were duped into paying tens of thousands of dollars for instruction at the now-defunct Trump University under false promises that they would be taught the magnate’s real-estate strategies. Mr. Trump denies the allegations, saying students got their money’s worth.
The judge has already set one case for trial in November. On Tuesday, he denied a motion by Mr. Trump that sought judgment in his favor in the second case without the need for trial proceedings.
Judge Curiel said the case raised several questions that would have to be put to a jury. He said it would be up to jurors to decide issues such as whether Mr. Trump was actively involved in managing the Trump University enterprise, and whether the executive misled students.
The judge also rejected Mr. Trump’s arguments that the students shouldn’t be able to bring allegations of racketeering in a case about “garden-variety business disputes.” The judge said Mr. Trump’s attempt to narrow the reach of racketeering law contravened “the settled approach” announced by appeals courts and the Supreme Court.