So Bill you've asked questions that I've tried to address and you simply out of hand reject any and all answers. You insist on being Trump's cheerleader and ask other people (me) for answers you appear to simply want to shoot down with partisan glee, making me highly suspicious of your motives.
So here is an article that explains quite clearly what was and what wasn't done correctly or well. But the fact is clear, if you were really as sincere about you questions as you pose, am I that much better than you at research?
“We recommend early budget and financial analysis of various response scenarios and an early decision to request supplemental funding from Congress, if needed,” the guide urges. But the Trump administration waited more than a month to
ask for emergency funding after the timeline laid out in the playbook.
The playbook also repeatedly urges officials to question official numbers about the viral spread. “What is our level of confidence on the case detection rate?” reads one question. “Is diagnostic capacity keeping up?” But across January and much of February, Trump administration officials publicly insisted that their diagnostic efforts were sufficient to detect coronavirus. Officials now privately concede that the administration’s
well-documented testing problems have contributed to the outbreak’s silent spread across the United States, and health experts say that diagnostic capacity is only now in late March catching up to the need.
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/03/25/trump-coronavirus-national-security-council-149285