The unspoken issue behind complaints about Free Trade treaties is that the treaty is not what is driving jobs abroad. The difference in wages drives jobs abroad. Nothing prevents a capitalist from closing his grommet factory in Tulsa and re-opening it in Tokyo or Tibet. NAFTA didn't exist when the New England mills closed. Ditto for the North Carolina mills that opened when they shifted from New England to North Carolina. When the Korean mills closed after arriving from North Carolina and shifted to China, no trade treaties were involved. Capitalists chase profits. Substitute cars for grommets or whatever. You can have protectionism or capitalism. Free Trade treaties just try to balance levels of protectionism. The trade off is jobs vs lower prices. It's home owned appliance stores vs Wal-Mart.When you shop at a Wal-Mart rather than at McCostly you've decided that Wal-Mart's shareholders get that profit rather than Mr. McCostly. A free trade treaty is an arrangement trying to apportion winners and losers. People who promise you there will be no losers if they're in charge are lying.
Listen, Our current trade policies have crippled the middle class, there is no refuting that. I don't think Trump is going to bring every job back, but something has to change.
I don't blame the companies that move, it's a no brainer to move a plant right across the border where wages are dirt cheap, and environmental laws are nonexistent. I do blame the politicians that have created this environment.
As we stand now the factory workers have to compete with the fear of their plant leaving, and the poor people have to compete with illegal immigrants, that in a nutshell is why pay has been stagnant or most likely gone down, while executive pay has skyrocketed.