ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Your last paragraph is truer than people are told. Medicaid and Medicare are poor solutions for health care. As usual blame the people you voted for.
What's wrong with Medicare? Medicaid is better than nothing. Nothing is poor.
 
For the record, communism and socialism aren’t the same thing. Communism is a far more radical version of socialism that outlaws all private ownership with a central government determining what people receive. Pure socialism calls for government ownership of all means of production but people can still own private property.

And literally not a single person running for President is calling for that, by the way.

The likes of Bernie Sanders are democratic socialists, and democratic socialism can exist with a free market capitalist economy, see many countries in Europe.

Hell, see USA for that matter. Ever heard of social security, Medicare, Medicaid, welfare, food stamps, etc.? That isn’t free market capitalist economic policy, that’s socialism. And we’re still living in a free market capitalist economy despite that.
Bernie's single payer Medicare for All is government controlled medical care. You do as you're told & get what they tell you you get. No choices. See Canada. See Brits National Health Service.
 
The problem with capitalism is the people in power (mostly 1 percenters) don’t want to take any accountability for how their greed enables millions of people to barely get with many of them even having to work multiple jobs at that.

It’s not moral when a Fortune 100 company is reporting record profits and their top executives are making 10s of millions a year while the rank and file employees have to scrape by to put food on the table. There’s something wrong in a society where someone does the responsible thing by going to the hospital or doctor because they are sick then ending up with 1000s of dollars in medical expenses they can’t afford to pay off and having to crowdfund it to avoid bankruptcy.

Hell if I know what the solution is, I just know it isn’t a full-scale socialist revolution or maintaining the status quo. It’s somewhere in the middle and both sides need to stop acting like petulant children and get serious about fixing the economic problems that many lower and middle class Americans face on a regular basis in this country.

Noone makes anyone do anything. Everyone is there for voluntary employment. They can leave whenever they want.

People working more than one job also don't voluntarily. Either to save money, to enjoy their current lifestyle to get ahead, to make up for bad choices, etc. It doesn't really matter. It's voluntary. With other systems it isn't.

There is no moral purity in economics. Either I get what I earn, or someone else gets what I earn. The former is much more fair than the former.

Wildcatboston charged his parents to chip in on his Netflix acct. Yet here he is giving people economic insight. Lol

you couldn’t make this stuff if you had to

Lmaoo

An entire generation is like this. They live with their parents, never done or owned anything, but feel smart because they copy/paste something from a Bernie bro website that's probably propped up by Chinese or Russian money.

That's why they get annihilated when their views encounter logic and reason
 
9 out of 10 Danes report being happy, which is far higher than in the USA. Seems to be working well for them. One would think being able to afford where they live would be a prerequisite for being happy as I would make a educated guess that a homeless person wouldn’t be happy.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.usnews.com/news/best-countries/articles/2016-01-20/why-danes-happily-pay-high-rates-of-taxes?context=amp

And as far as the tax rate goes, they get significantly more for their bang for their buck on their taxes than Americans get. Additionally, let’s say the there was universal health care. While that would increase the tax rate, it also reduces the amount of money coming out of your paycheck (and your employer’s finances if they offer it) towards health insurance, so that’s something you have to account for, not to mention any money you’d have to spend whenever you have a doctor or hospital visit. But I obviously have zero way of knowing if it would offset the tax increase because there are way too many variables at play there to even be able to make a guess with any certainty.

Even if Sanders (or anyone else) said that is what they wanted to base their goals on, it would have to be implemented over a very long period of time and heavily tweaked from the beginning and throughout its implementation to fit the USA. So alas, it’s mostly pointless to argue over it because what Denmark has will never be what USA has.
Big difference. The Danes grew up in their situation. They weren’t suddenly forced to convert to a system that suddenly doubles their taxes. I own a modest home. Not a mansion. I have a little over an acre of land. My home And property is worth about $280 - 300K. I’m not sure what that would owning property of that value in Denmark would classify me as. Regardless, Doubling my taxes would force me to downsize.

The tax increase Bernie has stated he would make. Around 12%, to cover MCA would far exceed the $109 dollars I’m having deducted from my check, pre-tax mind you, and which includes a certain level of life insurance and a couple of other optional coverages, vision and dental.
Not to mention, Bernie wants our tax dollars to cover people who are here or come here illegally. Denmark certainly doesn’t allow for that. And explain what kind of dangerous slippery slope it would be to open our borders then allow all those coming here free everything. Just how Is that even comprehensible? How would that not invite an absolute massive amount of illegals pouring into our country to get those services. How would that flood impact the level of care we get? How would that flood not make waits for that care untenable? It’s literally flawed logic.

As far as being happy goes...
https://news.gallup.com/poll/284285/new-high-americans-satisfied-personal-life.aspx
 
Noone makes anyone do anything. Everyone is there for voluntary employment. They can leave whenever they want.

People working more than one job also don't voluntarily. Either to save money, to enjoy their current lifestyle to get ahead, to make up for bad choices, etc. It doesn't really matter. It's voluntary. With other systems it isn't.

There is no moral purity in economics. Either I get what I earn, or someone else gets what I earn. The former is much more fair than the former.



Lmaoo

An entire generation is like this. They live with their parents, never done or owned anything, but feel smart because they copy/paste something from a Bernie bro website that's probably propped up by Chinese or Russian money.

That's why they get annihilated when their views encounter logic and reason
[roll]
 
  • Like
Reactions: UKfan34
Ya’ll. Wildcatboston works as a janitor for a Division III college gym. This guy is uneducated. He’s lecturing ya’ll on the merits of communism. Let that sink in. He thinks of himself as this great political mind and is selling you all a shit sandwich
And he responded to my question but never really answered it and never stated how his life would personally be impacted. Never mind also that Denmark has about the same population as Michigan so it’s truly apples and oranges.
 
Big difference. The Danes grew up in their situation. They weren’t suddenly forced to convert to a system that suddenly doubles their taxes. I own a modest home. Not a mansion. I have a little over an acre of land. My home And property is worth about $280 - 300K. I’m not sure what that would owning property of that value in Denmark would classify me as. Regardless, Doubling my taxes would force me to downsize.

The tax increase Bernie has stated he would make. Around 12%, to cover MCA would far exceed the $109 dollars I’m having deducted from my check, pre-tax mind you, and which includes a certain level of life insurance and a couple of other optional coverages, vision and dental.
Not to mention, Bernie wants our tax dollars to cover people who are here or come here illegally. Denmark certainly doesn’t allow for that. And explain what kind of dangerous slippery slope it would be to open our borders then allow all those coming here free everything. Just how Is that even comprehensible? How would that not invite an absolute massive amount of illegals pouring into our country to get those services. How would that flood impact the level of care we get? How would that flood not make waits for that care untenable? It’s literally flawed logic.

As far as being happy goes...
https://news.gallup.com/poll/284285/new-high-americans-satisfied-personal-life.aspx

Probably most importantly. Denmark has been mostly comprised of people of Danish lineage. Very little diversity in the population. You are now seeing the problems in these Scandinavian countries when they started opening their borders to immigrants more freely.
 
ER-DXVDUYAAYCHk
 
Big difference. The Danes grew up in their situation. They weren’t suddenly forced to convert to a system that suddenly doubles their taxes. I own a modest home. Not a mansion. I have a little over an acre of land. My home And property is worth about $280 - 300K. I’m not sure what that would owning property of that value in Denmark would classify me as. Regardless, Doubling my taxes would force me to downsize.

The tax increase Bernie has stated he would make. Around 12%, to cover MCA would far exceed the $109 dollars I’m having deducted from my check, pre-tax mind you, and which includes a certain level of life insurance and a couple of other optional coverages, vision and dental.
Not to mention, Bernie wants our tax dollars to cover people who are here or come here illegally. Denmark certainly doesn’t allow for that. And explain what kind of dangerous slippery slope it would be to open our borders then allow all those coming here free everything. Just how Is that even comprehensible? How would that not invite an absolute massive amount of illegals pouring into our country to get those services. How would that flood impact the level of care we get? How would that flood not make waits for that care untenable? It’s literally flawed logic.

As far as being happy goes...
https://news.gallup.com/poll/284285/new-high-americans-satisfied-personal-life.aspx
And you think what Bernie Sanders wants to do is just all going to be implemented full scale immediately? If you think that then you’re an idiot.
Noone makes anyone do anything. Everyone is there for voluntary employment. They can leave whenever they want.

People working more than one job also don't voluntarily. Either to save money, to enjoy their current lifestyle to get ahead, to make up for bad choices, etc. It doesn't really matter. It's voluntary. With other systems it isn't.

There is no moral purity in economics. Either I get what I earn, or someone else gets what I earn. The former is much more fair than the former.



Lmaoo

An entire generation is like this. They live with their parents, never done or owned anything, but feel smart because they copy/paste something from a Bernie bro website that's probably propped up by Chinese or Russian money.

That's why they get annihilated when their views encounter logic and reason
But part of the government’s job is to regulate moral behavior, hence why every local, state, and national government has laws that regulate was is legal and illegal, many laws of which pertain to economics and finances.
 
Noone makes anyone do anything. Everyone is there for voluntary employment. They can leave whenever they want.

People working more than one job also don't voluntarily. Either to save money, to enjoy their current lifestyle to get ahead, to make up for bad choices, etc. It doesn't really matter. It's voluntary. With other systems it isn't.

There is no moral purity in economics. Either I get what I earn, or someone else gets what I earn. The former is much more fair than the former.



Lmaoo

An entire generation is like this. They live with their parents, never done or owned anything, but feel smart because they copy/paste something from a Bernie bro website that's probably propped up by Chinese or Russian money.

That's why they get annihilated when their views encounter logic and reason

I think you hit the nail on the head. A large percentage of those clamoring for Socialism are people who want to be protected from their own poor life choices and lack of direction.
 
The problem with capitalism is the people in power (mostly 1 percenters) don’t want to take any accountability for how their greed enables millions of people to barely get with many of them even having to work multiple jobs at that.

It’s not moral when a Fortune 100 company is reporting record profits and their top executives are making 10s of millions a year while the rank and file employees have to scrape by to put food on the table. There’s something wrong in a society where someone does the responsible thing by going to the hospital or doctor because they are sick then ending up with 1000s of dollars in medical expenses they can’t afford to pay off and having to crowdfund it to avoid bankruptcy.

Hell if I know what the solution is, I just know it isn’t a full-scale socialist revolution or maintaining the status quo. It’s somewhere in the middle and both sides need to stop acting like petulant children and get serious about fixing the economic problems that many lower and middle class Americans face on a regular basis in this country.

Nobody makes you buy from a corporation. That’s a fact.

Now, I want you to explain how it’s moral for the government to redistribute what I worked for to other people. I’ll be waiting for your answer.
 
"They" are the radical left, people who are proposing radical solutions that could only in the end make things much worse. The expanded they of fools in congress have been working on this problem for decades and in no small part also share responsibility for why it's gotten as bad as it has.

I am making the claim that a typical and sufficiently motivated individual can take better care of himself than the government can, and it's 100% truth.

Your K-12 education and maintaining public health are fundamentally different by nature for a myriad of reasons. It strains credulity that absent an incentive to do so, you would logically conclude they are similar because people need it.

Something like 70% of medical innovation occurs in the US, which is a pretty ridiculous stat. Why? Because people can profit, and profit can be used to take the risky investment to innovate and produce. What incentive does the government have to do this? What about after you have syphoned off so much wealth from the 1% 50%, grants dry up to universities used for research? How many lives lost by cures that were never found? How many lost innovations that would've led to decrease in costs? And in this case, this hurts not only us, but the rest of the world, those "better" healthcare systems who get handed our innovations for free on a silver platter.

What would I do? Other than what I already mentioned, reducing demand and there's a wide variety of creative ways you could do this, I would expand medicare for the poor as we have already decided (rightly) to serve the needs of the very poor. For everyone else struggling with chronic diseases that they have difficulty paying for, I would expand social security to cover those payments and I would increase social security taxes on the top 10% or whatever to pay for it because indeed we need productive people to have their illnesses managed so they can stay productive. Could have tax rebates, programs to keep people out of bankruptcy, better rules on out of network and reciprocal payments costs and other specific targeted pin prick solutions...Something along those lines, and I would spend all my time working on treating the cause not the symptoms, like say Tort reform capping the maximum liability doctors/hospitals are liable for malpractice and do everything I possible could not to ruin (like socialism would) the best medicine in the world, where the world's greatest doctors leave their homes to come practice here at places like John Hopkins or Mass General because it's only here they can truly be on the cutting edge of their field.

You just haven't thought this through further than your own nose, and I mean that not in the arrogant way you take my typing, but it's the reality. I type frankly and directly, you are wrong.

Anyway, that's basically my position, that and that scapegoating the insurance industries and Martin Skrelli's of the world doesn't get you where you need to go,more government regulation is probably needed there. I wish you good luck in managing your condition/.

You have some good ideas here CRO. Without accessing your references, I can agree that 70% of innovation related to health is done in the U.S. Help me though. I am really worried about socialistic radicals pushing government on me. Expanding Medicare and Social Security and taxation on Social Security on top earners sounds too "socialistic". The profit motive must be kept in all areas of our economy and to ensure that innovation continues we must not allow any element of competition to arise to the private market. Thus, we become USSR or Venezuala.

The profit motive also must be preserved when addressing infectious diseases. We must make sure that the cost research and production of vaccines is considered when pricing. Lets let the market handle that. To make sure big government does not overwhelm the healthcare industruy, we must make sure that if a healthcare executive determines that corona virus vaccine is worth investing in, we must make sure he sets the cost. Otherwise, it will not be profitable ($) and thus he won't make any money. This is the incentive. If corona virus vaccine cost is set at $200 per injection, we must preserve this cost. The cost/benefit ratio analysis will set the rate according to what the market expresses. Of course, some people will die but the fundamentals will be preserved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gassy_Knowls
I'm at the point where I think the spread is inevitable and we are going to waste a lot of time and money trying to contain it when we should just go ahead and infect everyone and get it over with. The economy is going to suffer a death by a thousand cuts before we all end up contracting it anyway.

I'll assume you are serious. I come to this board for rational discussion of political issues. I am confused though; it does seem that the GOP is less nihilistic. I rely on the Real news to at least operate in the real world.
 
Medicare isn't socialist for those that have it today.

Yes. If you want to call it Socialist, Capitalist, Anarcho-Syndicalist, Libertarian, Social Democratic, Democratic Socialist, or Communistic, the latest data (via the Liberal Hacks at the Yale institute) report Medicare for All saves about $480 billion per year. Of course, we must prepare that Americans will interpret these savings as encouraging for their lives, as they receive quality healthcare. Next stop, Venezuala.
 
By the numbers:

German sales tax (VAT): 19%
German tax on food: 7%
German gasoline tax/gallon average: $2.78. 1 US gal gasoline costs $5.72.

German smoking rate (2013): 24% US: 15.1%

German diabetic sufferers in 1945: 600,000. 2011: 8,000,000

German overweight males: 67%

Percentage of German adults with BMI greater than 25: 60%

German military service: Compulsory. In 2007, 40% of new Bundewehr recruits were considered overweight.

German monthly television tax per residence: $20.40, a $1.10 increase over 2019.

Later this afternoon, before the game and after a few beers, I'll gladly blow more holes into your utopian vision of Germany.

Ta ta!
Yes. That is a good point and strategy. It is a technique that works pretty well. Lets say I disagree with an approach. I point out some statistics that indicate a reality and then say the other side is "Utopian". It is an effective technique, because it shuts down further exploration of the issue. Like if I say the U.S. is Utopia because it is a capitalist system. But hold on, is the U.S. a capitalist system? I just want to be consistent. In my community I've been trying to get leaders to put a cost on the following to subject them to market forces: the fire department, the police department, the public library, my public park, the social security my mother receives, Medicare, and the roads under my feet. I'm running on this platform for mayor and hope I get a lot of votes.
 
For the record, communism and socialism aren’t the same thing. Communism is a far more radical version of socialism that outlaws all private ownership with a central government determining what people receive. Pure socialism calls for government ownership of all means of production but people can still own private property.

And literally not a single person running for President is calling for that, by the way.

The likes of Bernie Sanders are democratic socialists, and democratic socialism can exist with a free market capitalist economy, see many countries in Europe.

Hell, see USA for that matter. Ever heard of social security, Medicare, Medicaid, welfare, food stamps, etc.? That isn’t free market capitalist economic policy, that’s socialism. And we’re still living in a free market capitalist economy despite that.

You are being unfair Boston. Your statement doesn't fit with my narrative so I choose to call you, lets say, Castro or Chavez. That's all I got.
 
Noone makes anyone do anything. Everyone is there for voluntary employment. They can leave whenever they want.

People working more than one job also don't voluntarily. Either to save money, to enjoy their current lifestyle to get ahead, to make up for bad choices, etc. It doesn't really matter. It's voluntary. With other systems it isn't.

There is no moral purity in economics. Either I get what I earn, or someone else gets what I earn. The former is much more fair than the former.



Lmaoo

An entire generation is like this. They live with their parents, never done or owned anything, but feel smart because they copy/paste something from a Bernie bro website that's probably propped up by Chinese or Russian money.

That's why they get annihilated when their views encounter logic and reason


Thats such a good point about morality in economics. The "invisible hand of the market" will lead to better overall outcomes and the meritocracy will thrive. This is what we are trying to achieve but the liberals in San Francisco are preventing us from letting capitalism to its work. Economics is economics. Save your morality for Sunday. What the market determines is amoral. It is what it is. Of course, the Fed just pumped in $480 billion to the banks one month ago at 2.5 % interest and then they loan out the money to the public at 12%. Of course that loan must be part of the laissez-faire plan. I looked all over Breitbart, CNN, Fox News, MSNBC for an analysis of this Fed Loan but came up dry. I must be the only one interested.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bigblueinsanity
Thats such a good point about morality in economics. The "invisible hand of the market" will lead to better overall outcomes and the meritocracy will thrive. This is what we are trying to achieve but the liberals in San Francisco are preventing us from letting capitalism to its work. Economics is economics. Save your morality for Sunday. What the market determines is amoral. It is what it is. Of course, the Fed just pumped in $480 billion to the banks one month ago at 2.5 % interest and then they loan out the money to the public at 12%. Of course that loan must be part of the laissez-faire plan. I looked all over Breitbart, CNN, Fox News, MSNBC for an analysis of this Fed Loan but came up dry. I must be the only one interested.

What do you propose we do that would make our lives better?
 
Noone makes anyone do anything. Everyone is there for voluntary employment. They can leave whenever they want.

People working more than one job also don't voluntarily. Either to save money, to enjoy their current lifestyle to get ahead, to make up for bad choices, etc. It doesn't really matter. It's voluntary. With other systems it isn't.

There is no moral purity in economics. Either I get what I earn, or someone else gets what I earn. The former is much more fair than the former.



Lmaoo

An entire generation is like this. They live with their parents, never done or owned anything, but feel smart because they copy/paste something from a Bernie bro website that's probably propped up by Chinese or Russian money.

That's why they get annihilated when their views encounter logic and reason
For real. And the Bernie Bros are pumped up by special interests, which I think we all hate.

Watch. The liberals in New York will support Trump once behind the curtain. Of course, they will say that are Blue no matter Who. They love those tax cuts. They wish Trump would just be a little more polite though, and their wives wanna have something to talk about at cocktail parties to make them seem woke.

Of course the Bernie Bros choose not to work and it's pretty clear that the Bernie Bros. are not working two jobs in the service industry without health insurance, paying another mortgage for childcare, and bailing their neglected kids out of jail. I'm sure these folks received the advanced degree in Economics requires to understand Capex's ongoing decline and the relationship to static wages over the last 30 years. As well, they understand propaganda techniques used to frame discussion that ultimately lead to an educated person ending the discussion with "you're a boobie head".

I'm sure they also have read Fukuyama and Thomas Friedman who alerted us in the early 90's of "the end of history". There was no human will involved in globalization and "labor markets". It was God's will, that lifted all boats for best possible outcomes, where investment would go where there would be best return. Sorry about your luck if you didn't thrive within this framework. It was simply mandated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bigblueinsanity
Beave made a really nice point that healthcare for people like him is broken. He also made an irrefutable point that big pharmaceuticals and hospital systems are monopolies that have all politicians (R and D) in their pockets. I’m sure there are changes that can be made to make it a better system for all, and I’m not sure why you dumbasses are disagreeing with him. Oh wait - I do - that’s politics in 2020. Broken.
I have no idea what this means. You must work within a dualistic framework for me to understand. Too much context and realism here; I wish I understood.
 
For real. And the Bernie Bros are pumped up by special interests, which I think we all hate.

Watch. The liberals in New York will support Trump once behind the curtain. Of course, they will say that are Blue no matter Who. They love those tax cuts. They wish Trump would just be a little more polite though, and their wives wanna have something to talk about at cocktail parties to make them seem woke.

Of course the Bernie Bros choose not to work and it's pretty clear that the Bernie Bros. are not working two jobs in the service industry without health insurance, paying another mortgage for childcare, and bailing their neglected kids out of jail. I'm sure these folks received the advanced degree in Economics requires to understand Capex's ongoing decline and the relationship to static wages over the last 30 years. As well, they understand propaganda techniques used to frame discussion that ultimately lead to an educated person ending the discussion with "you're a boobie head".

I'm sure they also have read Fukuyama and Thomas Friedman who alerted us in the early 90's of "the end of history". There was no human will involved in globalization and "labor markets". It was God's will, that lifted all boats for best possible outcomes, where investment would go where there would be best return. Sorry about your luck if you didn't thrive within this framework. It was simply mandated.

So you understand how and why Trump was elected. The voting public saw exactly what you’re railing against.

You know what those Bernie Bro’s really liked? Free trade agreements and manufacturing going to China. Probably liked that more than the tax cut, as their state taxes in NY were no longer deductible.
Those service industry jobs were primarily entry level jobs prior to 20-25 years ago. Because they require little skill, only we shipped out a large portion of the manufacturing jobs that people moved onto as they aged.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT