Do you have a coherent thought?Ite amazing ppl like rq can't see this for what it is bc they are hoping and praying to get him out regardless. Has it ever crossed his mind why the house completely half passed everything in a hurry, then held on to it for over a month? Of course not. The D's no its bs and they knew it would never get passed the Senate bc theres nothing there. It's nothing more than a political ad and to try to rile ppl up against Republicans, per usual. Bc R's always have to prove themselves, D's we are just supposed to accept it.
If not, @rqarnold can point out when he considered impeachment for things like fast and furious or whatever else. He cant bc he didnt care then and he knows the reason he does now is bc of reality, it's just what he wants.
I'm guessing hes never questioned why democrats are panicking to attack Bernie right now either.
He is a traitor to America because he wishes for our demise in the hope of a world government and the enslavement of the American people in the form of communism. He is the enemy.RQ/FUZZ is absolutely giddy today with the drop in the stock market. Shitpost after shitpost. All his hopes and dreams coming to fruition.
There is nothing in the Constitution that says the House can only hear witnesses or that the Senate cannot hear additional witnesses. Period. Full stop.I would like to hear him under oath, but as an American, I know we have to respect the Constitution. That’s why I’m disappointed the House did not follow the proper legal process for compelling his testimony, if possible. The House had the ability to subpoena Bolton. The House chose to ask “Moscow Mitch” to do their job for them.
With a name like “Moscow Mitch” and his position as enemy #1 of the Democrats, I’m surprised they chose to rely on him to do the job they were fully capable and empowered to do.
But why didnt the house call them...its a simple question. You know, slam dunk and allThere is nothing in the Constitution that says the House can only hear witnesses or that the Senate cannot hear additional witnesses. Period. Full stop.
...“punch the reporter in their face“,My political career would be over at that point because I would punch the reporter in their face.
Agree. The only people I have on ignore are habitual liars. No problem with people having a different opinion but the constant lies from them is just over the top.I hate liars, I’d never make it as a politician because I’d go off on their lies and come off as violent. If posters on here keep telling lies I put them on ignore, you’re fkn useless to me if trying to be honest (outside of joking) means nothing to you.
Yeah, it could not be the liberal mindset that everything permissible. Racism, the go to defense for every shortfall. Damn you lefties are stupid.
Well, if he is willing tell it under oath knowing that he is going to jail if he lies...that’s more convincing to me than someone who is using every excuse and obstacle to avoid having to testify under oath.
Says the hypocrite who did not pay his bet. Freaken loser. Is there a bridge somewhere near you where you could do us (America) a favor on?
Guarantee, one punch on these snow flakes would damage them permanently. Acceptable punishment for their crimes against America....“punch the reporter in their face“,
Break both his legs,
Then kick his ass out of place
You are too afraid to engage anyone one so...even that fat old man would stomp a mud hole in your pansy ass.Stereotypical Trumper.....Fat, lazy looking slob sneaking up from behind
Reckon?You are too afraid to engage anyone one so...even that fat old man would stomp a mud hole in your pansy ass.
Do you have a coherent thought?
Whataboutism isn’t a defense. If you had two working brain cells you’d realize it.
Book deals seem shady as hell. Our favorite former poster and current lurker made a comment on his Iowa trip podcast that Amy Klobuchar acknowledged he was the "guy from Kentucky writing the book". Yeah? Presidential candidates take the time to find out about side projects of local sports radio hosts?
Only because so many people died because of tax breaks and net neutrality. That's why the numbers are skewed.
I really think that, as anyone reading here can probably tell. No way in hell anyone was paid to write that book because it would turn a profit. Also no way in hell a fairly obscure presidential candidate would know about it.
Ya I'm sure she, and the rest of the world, can't wait to read about Matt and tjs retelling of this one time someone in oldham county was mad at Mitch. Then read the same garbage 119 more times. Yes...I'm sure they're all lined up for that
Nice...
They just played that clip of Obama poo-pooing Romney and his Russia threat
hahahahahahahahaah...ooohhhh my, how that has aged...
Obama, libs, MSM laughed Romney out of politics and the Northeast for that...hahahahahahahahaha...poor fella had to retreat to and hide out in Mormon motherland...
The House did. Executive privilege was claimed. All of the subpoenas wouldn’t have worked their way through the courts before the election.But why didnt the house call them...its a simple question. You know, slam dunk and all
There is nothing in the Constitution that says the House can only hear witnesses or that the Senate cannot hear additional witnesses. Period. Full stop.
New Ite amazing ppl like rq can't see this for what it is bc they are hoping and praying to get him out regardless.
The House did. Executive privilege was claimed. All of the subpoenas wouldn’t have worked their way through the courts before the election.
Why didn’t you try harder in school?But why didnt the house call them...its a simple question. You know, slam dunk and all
The House did. Executive privilege was claimed. All of the subpoenas wouldn’t have worked their way through the courts before the election.
Why didn’t you try harder in school?
The question is now without relevance. Perhaps they should have done so, that is no reason not to do so now.
Either you’re interested in hearing all the available information or you’re not. Debating what should or should not have happened solves nothing.
The information is coming out as soon as Bolton’s book is published. How will the Senate look if the book is damning and the Senate then has to defend their decision to take part in a cover up? Or maybe it’s all good for Trump and it wins him support. As an old boss of mine once told me...bad news never gets better with time. Take part in a coverup and the entire GOP puts their Senate majority in serious jeopardy.
Both.So this is only about politics, not any crimes. Got it.
The House did. Executive privilege was claimed. All of the subpoenas wouldn’t have worked their way through the courts before the election.
Both.
Why didn’t you try harder in school?
The question is now without relevance. Perhaps they should have done so, that is no reason not to do so now.
Either you’re interested in hearing all the available information or you’re not. Debating what should or should not have happened solves nothing.
The information is coming out as soon as Bolton’s book is published. How will the Senate look if the book is damning and the Senate then has to defend their decision to take part in a cover up? Or maybe it’s all good for Trump and it wins him support. As an old boss of mine once told me...bad news never gets better with time. Take part in a coverup and the entire GOP puts their Senate majority in serious jeopardy.
Or I do understand.Not surprisingly, you lack the ability to comprehend what’s going on.
He’s not getting removed because the Republican Senate will protect him. So the people’s only course of redress is the election in the fall. Have to get as much out as you can before then.If there were crimes, wouldn’t it make sense to develop a case whether or not that happens before the election so you can impeach him in the second term?
Didn’t say they did. They asked him to testify. Executive privilege was claimed. Didn’t have time for the subpoenas.The House did not subpoena Bolton.