I’m far from lazy. I work a lot of hours and am on the road 3/5 days on average. Just because I sit at a desk while you are toiling in a hot kitchen doesn’t make me lazy.
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
I’m far from lazy. I work a lot of hours and am on the road 3/5 days on average. Just because I sit at a desk while you are toiling in a hot kitchen doesn’t make me lazy.
So have you decided which of your party's candidates you're voting for yet? There's what, 10 or so still in the running. You seem like a Buttplug kind of guy.
We're obviously in dire times and desperately need a Marxist to lead us to utopia. Who ya got dipshit?
Mitch is giving Democrats what they deserve, what did house Democrats do? Stop being a damn hypocrite and open your eyes.
lol
Yes, the House was In essence a grand jury, one of the sole requirements of which is the jurors be unbiased.
And it’s doubly funny you compare this sham to a trial when the democrats just spent the past few weeks telling everyone they could impeachment is politics, not justice.
So nope. Your time to call witnesses for your sham was a few weeks back. Should have compelled them to testify at that point (which would have been challenged to the Supreme Court and shot down, thus dragging your impeachment ruse too far out into election season before it was dealt another embarrassing blow).
Yet you're the one comparing this to a trial when the defendant was given zero due process to mount a defense and 90% of testimony/evidence against him was second, third, fourth hand hearsay, which would be inadmissible.
The thing about a grand jury is hearsay can be presented, and it’s done in secret without due process. And a lot of people feel it’s a miscarriage of justice. So it’s close to what the House did, with the one glaring exception being grad juries are required to be impartial, not to collude with the “witnesses” to build a case. So there literally no argument that the House sham was comparable to anything in our JUSTICE system. It was a sham from the get go, and didn’t even have the savings graces of other legal processes many people consider shams.
D Alcee Hastings was impeached by congress and removed as a federal judge for bribery. Now he’s on the committee deciding the rules for the impeachment of Trump.
Piss of a democrat. Tell them Merry Christmas. Watch their reaction. You would think someone shoved a turd up their nose.
"I’m moved for your statements and also by your work for anti-corruption..."
Cocaine Mitch looked up from his lines of coke and said to Romney "do as your told Mitt...you little Mormon b-tch". The conversation was over. More cocaine was had by all in the room except Mitt...who sipped quietly on some water.
https://summit.news/2019/12/17/sweden-migrant-gang-beat-urinate-on-teenager/
What the culturally enlightened wants to bring to America.
What the culturally enlightened wants to bring to America.
Remember when they all claimed Trump was a deranged conspiracy theorist unfit for office? Some even suggested that he be impeached for being so unfit for office because he dare accuse his "wires were tapped.
![[roll]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/roll.r191677.gif "roll [roll]")
![[poop]](https://ct.yimg.com/mr/uploads/891/1682179.png "Poop [poop]")
for brains
"Hey let's go to the founder of JounOlist and then Vox for his opinion on why we are divided."
I hate these people.
I hate these people.
Clinesmith is the one who altered evidence.
Never thought about it in these terms. How many past cases/warrants did he possibly put in jeopardy?
Never thought about it in these terms. How many past cases/warrants did he possibly put in jeopardy?
FISA court is tearing the FBI a new one. The rats are scurrying about now. Won't be long until they start climbing over each other to jump off the boat.
Wasn't it platinumdumb who mentioned peeling the onion? HaHa Good call. Missed it by thismuch.
Wasn't it platinumdumb who mentioned peeling the onion? HaHa Good call. Missed it by thismuch.
Yes, something that should be more in the news. Why on earth would the Dems put him on the committee knowing this?
Systemic hypocrisy. Hypocrisy supremacy. Hypocrisy Matters!
Why We're Polarized?...zero self awareness. How 'bout they look in the mirror.
Dissent is still allowed on the right side of the aisle Booty.
I'll bet everything I have that there are a lot more dems who wish they could speak out against their party and leadership...but they toe the line...
House is not a grand jury or like it. This is a political process, not a criminal one.
One of the people involved in the attempted coup goes on the show of one of the most laughable Russian collusion propagandist...
Notice, Maddow has not been taken to task by anyone for her Russian hysteria...
Notice, Maddow has not been taken to task by anyone for her Russian hysteria...
A state senator from Nebraska and 1/2 doz random twitters. They couldn't even get a blue check for the fake news.
Much respect. Your game is strong.
Hey Lisa, keep your panties on the next time you are drawing a paycheck from the U.S. Govt. Leave that Peter alone
“FBI and DOJ officials did not ‘abuse’ the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) process, omit material information, or subvert this vital tool to spy on the Trump campaign.”, Schiff's memo began.
THEREFORE,the Court ORDERS that the government shall, no later than January 10 2020, inform the Court in a sworn written submission of what it has done, and plans to do,to ensure that the statement of facts in each FBI application accurately and completely reflects...information possessed by the FBI that is material to any issue presented by the application. In the event that the FBI at the time of that submission is not yet able to perform any of the planned steps described in the submission, it shall also include(a) a proposed time table for implementing such measures and (b) an explanation of why, in the governments view, the information in FBI applications submitted in the interim should be regarded as reliable. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to FISC Rule of Procedure 62(a), that the government shall, no later than December 20 2019, complete a declassification review of the above-referenced order of December 5, 2019, in anticipation of the FISC's publishing that order. In view of the information released to the public in the Report, the Court expects that such review will entail minimal if any redactions.
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/6582028/FISC-Order-12-17.pdf
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/6582028/FISC-Order-12-17.pdf
92% of Americans think their basic rights are being threatened, new poll shows
https://amp.usatoday.com/amp/4385967002
Most Americans surveyed – 92% – think their rights are under siege, according to a poll released Monday.
Americans are most concerned that their freedom of speech (48%), right to bear arms (47%) and right to equal justice (41%) are at risk, says the Harris Poll/Purple Project, which surveyed 2,002 people nationwide.
"When you frame something as a threat, it creates a bit of a political response, and it creates division and encampments of special interest," said John Gerzema, CEO of the Harris Poll. That's why political parties and lobbying groups warn supporters with strident language, he said: It's easier to drum up backing for a political cause by talking about an issue in terms of "threats."
But when you start to consider which rights and freedoms really matter, Gerzema said, poll responses changed – and Americans re-prioritized which values they cared about most.
Gerzema's advice to the folks in Washington? Focus on the things that are fundamental to the American way of life.
"There is something wonderful going on underneath the surface, and that's what I wish our leaders in Washington would pay attention to," he said. "You start to see the true, softer side of America's rough-and-tumble political reality."
https://amp.usatoday.com/amp/4385967002
Most Americans surveyed – 92% – think their rights are under siege, according to a poll released Monday.
Americans are most concerned that their freedom of speech (48%), right to bear arms (47%) and right to equal justice (41%) are at risk, says the Harris Poll/Purple Project, which surveyed 2,002 people nationwide.
"When you frame something as a threat, it creates a bit of a political response, and it creates division and encampments of special interest," said John Gerzema, CEO of the Harris Poll. That's why political parties and lobbying groups warn supporters with strident language, he said: It's easier to drum up backing for a political cause by talking about an issue in terms of "threats."
But when you start to consider which rights and freedoms really matter, Gerzema said, poll responses changed – and Americans re-prioritized which values they cared about most.
Gerzema's advice to the folks in Washington? Focus on the things that are fundamental to the American way of life.
"There is something wonderful going on underneath the surface, and that's what I wish our leaders in Washington would pay attention to," he said. "You start to see the true, softer side of America's rough-and-tumble political reality."
If you're still a Dem, you;re either a willfully dumb MF, a woefully stubborn MF, or a filthy, kid-didling, POS MF.
Take your pick, lowlifes.
Similar threads
