To Beto: You are no John F. Kennedy. Forget it, you are not even close. You are a shame and a disgrace!!!
To Beto: You are no John F. Kennedy. Forget it, you are not even close. You are a shame and a disgrace!!!
And winced when watching it and talking about it.LOL!! In the history of his tweets he posted these:
There is no welfare state here for illegal residents today either.
Yeah, the last thing someone who is here illegally is wants is to register with the government so they know where they are and how to deliver "free stuff".
There can be a reasonable discussion about illegal residents but it does nothing constructive to continue trying to drive false narratives.
Never forget that the WaPo were one of those leading the charge against a 16 year old for smirking.Past Washington Post obits...
Cold hard truth, yeah right. You guys interpret what he says (Ukraine phone call) withAre you a complete moron? On second thought, we know the answer to that question.
The WaPo didn't post from Trump's twitter account, didn't write scripts from which Trump speaks. You epitomize the brain dead nature of most Trump followers. It doesn't matter what he says, what he does, when somebody points out his lies or his hypocrisy using his own words, even video of him speaking you immediately jump to attacking the messenger rather than accepting and acknowledging the cold, hard truth.
Cold hard truth, yeah right. You guys interpret what he says (Ukraine phone call) with
different meanings than what was said and run with it.
Reminds me of when Seal Team 6 killed Bin Laden and every liberal on the web claimed Obama did it. Obama.
Hey libs did Trump do this?
I haven't heard him say anything but praise for the soldiers who carried out the mission. O'bama acted like he planned the whole thing and directed the entire operation from the WH.
You are the ignorant one when it comes to Trump. You cry and whine when no one agrees with what you post which by the way comes from untrustworthy biased sites which are known for hating the president. They manipulate their readers and watchers with their "opinions" stated as facts later on to have almost all if not all of what they state being debunked. FACT! It is just sad how easily duped you really are.Bill, did you bother to look at the links I posted? Have you done no research on your own?
Just admit that you wish to stay willfully ignorant when it comes to Trump.
You have serious problems. Seek help please.The only reason pelosi and company were pissed about being left out is because they'd warn them. Not even joking.
Many posters thought I was crazy a year or so ago when I posted the msm must be funded and directed by radical islam. Stuff like this just proves me right. And the mask comes off more and more every day
She is lying here, looking to tack on more Russia lies to go with the other ones that her followers need to believe.
Well that ended long ago, but still glad to see her speak out as a member of that industry.She will never act again now.
WaPo changing things again? But I was told they were...never mind.
That makes too much sense and the left will never go for it because, it would mean they would not have much of a chance in future elections.If politicians truly want election integrity in this country, then we need to establish a Federal Voting ID for each eligible voter that is also tied to a social security number (or alternative federal ID number) to prevent duplications for the same person. For receiving a Federal ID, you will have to declare your home voting precinct to prevent absentee or multiple voting fraud by those who are registered in multiple districts.
When you go to vote in a Federal election, then you will provide your ID number to sign-in as casting a ballot; but, it will not be tied directly to your ballot to prevent the government from knowing exactly how you voted (to avoid retaliation if you did not vote for the winning candidate/party).
If the same Federal ID is used in multiple precincts or it does not match your self-designated home precinct, then the incident can be investigated by election officials. If the number of incidents exceed the vote differentiation in that precinct, then much closer scrutiny would be conducted.
We have to reject the notion of those saying, "There is no widespread evidence." OK, then as a "progressive" you have no problem with enabling ourselves to collect actual auditable data to give the public "peace of mind" and to show established efforts of integrity? After all, that is progressing into a better system than what we currently have in place.
Furthermore, if all you want is evidence, then maybe we just need Russia to declare that they are sending thousands of operatives to Democratic voting areas with little to no identification policies to vote for Trump in 2020. If the outside boogie man openly threatens to challenge or break the system, then maybe we will finally see the change that is needed.
Just got back from Tulsa and as I suspected, a lot of overweight folks down there. At least, 75% of them were republicansFalse by the way big time.
I can almost like that one, it shows a bit of a sense of humor. Too bad it comes from some one so easily duped. Keep trying and one day you too could possibly see things the "right" way.Just got back from Tulsa and as I suspected, a lot of overweight folks down there. At least, 75% of them were republicans
That is just funny and probably close to true.