ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Why can't you guys just argue that what Trump did fails to warrant impeachment. Why do you have to make him out to be a crusading do-gooder?

I guess you failed to read the dozens of pages where we have been doing just that.

Also, on top of Wikileaks verifying the dem/media collusion, we have verified reports that the Obama DOJ/FBI used the media in order to legitimize the phony dossier so they could then get the illegal warrants from the secret court.

Of course, we have Ben Rhodes admitting they used a willing media “echo chamber” in his own book.

Open your f*cking eyes. Or use your brain. Either one will enlighten you a little bit.
 
People on the right used to complain about the liberal media (and it certainly is liberal) but now (apparently, from what I see in this thrad) people on the right claim that the media is part of some conspiracy to protect liberal elites and to thwart investigations of corruption by Trump and his allies. For this to be true, everyone in the media (besides those at Fox News) would have to be in on the "conspiracy". I don't get it. Why can't you guys just argue that what Trump did fails to warrant impeachment. Why do you have to make him out to be a crusading do-gooder?


What do your last two sentences have to do with the rest of the paragraph?

If you can’t see the majority of the media is operating as a mouthpiece for the DNC, there’s no hope for you. How many completely baseless, anonymously sourced bullshit stories need to be corrected for you to realize these aren’t mistakes?

Furthermore, have you never heard of the Journolist? You think that shit went away?

I honestly thought we were past the point where anyone on the left even denied the fact the majority of the media is in the DNC’s tank. Can’t imagine how far in the sand your head has to be buried to be that unaware.

What Trump factually did, objectively, does not warrant impeachment. We’ve covered that plenty of times. But your media keeps pounding the drum. The Obama administration’s attempted coup was legitimate treason, yet you don’t hear a peep in the media. Partly because half of the people working at the media outlets also worked for Obama.

Obviously you’ll disagree Obama (and the lackies in his administration) did anything wrong, because you haven’t been told by the DNC mouthpieces he did anything wrong. Yet they harp on Trumps innocent conduct as if it were illegal.
 
People on the right used to complain about the liberal media (and it certainly is liberal) but now (apparently, from what I see in this thrad) people on the right claim that the media is part of some conspiracy to protect liberal elites and to thwart investigations of corruption by Trump and his allies. For this to be true, everyone in the media (besides those at Fox News) would have to be in on the "conspiracy". I don't get it. Why can't you guys just argue that what Trump did fails to warrant impeachment. Why do you have to make him out to be a crusading do-gooder?
There is an incestuous relationship b/w the DNC and the major media outlets and getting worse by the day. How many false stories and corrections and fake/overblown stories does it take? Not a consipiracy, just an echo chamber of people working backwards like a defense attorney.
 
Mafia talking point like a good boy. Besides the boorish part the rest is nonsense and unproven wishes. The guy is an egomania but is not enriching himself. His family will have lost billions from all this when all is said and done.
 
But china is building the plants outside the cities so everything is cool. he said jinping is doing the will of the people. bloomberg is an idiot. how can a fool like him hold on to such vast wealth that he possesses?

Fool or evil genius? He, Soros, Styer, etc. are working with the Chicoms imo. These evil fu*ks have a pact with the devil. Endgame is total control of humanity. The stuff going on right now has a biblical revelation type feel to them. It's building to something epic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: blubo
There is an incestuous relationship b/w the DNC and the major media outlets and getting worse by the day. How many false stories and corrections and fake/overblown stories does it take? Not a consipiracy, just an echo chamber of people working backwards like a defense attorney.

It's pretty clear they all sing out of the same songbook, The Communist Manifesto or Rules for Radicals. Che and Mao would be proud.
 
People on the right used to complain about the liberal media (and it certainly is liberal) but now (apparently, from what I see in this thrad) people on the right claim that the media is part of some conspiracy to protect liberal elites and to thwart investigations of corruption by Trump and his allies. For this to be true, everyone in the media (besides those at Fox News) would have to be in on the "conspiracy". I don't get it. Why can't you guys just argue that what Trump did fails to warrant impeachment. Why do you have to make him out to be a crusading do-gooder?

It was all evident when trump was elected when the media talking point was they are part of the balance of power. They declared themselves a check on the presidency. That’s the conspiracy as benign as it seems the media is there to report facts not to be a check on a branch of government. The media has become partisan and opinionated. They don’t report facts they have pushed their way to the front in order to scold the president no matter the facts.
 
How did the investigation of Trump start, and why was the FISA judicial system abused?

If the peaceful transition of power was intentionally hampered, or steps put in place to undermine a duly elected President, that is treasonous behavior and people need to be held accountable.

Amen to all!

And specifically did notable Democrats target, initiate or persuade such investigations to gain electoral advantage and hinder the Republic?

Perhaps they did, though we don’t yet have the level of proof that Trump and his team very foolishly released without a fight.
 
This is what I’m saying. The rubios the Cruz’s even McConnell they don’t want trump. He thwarts their agenda. If they have a button to press in order to get rid of him they will do it. People don’t want to hear it but it’s true.
McConnell would love for trump to be gone but keep his hands clean.
 
Amen to all!

And specifically did notable Democrats target, initiate or persuade such investigations to gain electoral advantage and hinder the Republic?

Perhaps they did, though we don’t yet have the level of proof that Trump and his team very foolishly released without a fight.


This is a troll, correct? Haven’t really seen him post here much before today.
 
Libs always ruin everything. Now anytime the US talks with other world leaders they wont be able to talk business or policy bc they know dems will pull political stunts to get transcripts when theres nothing there. Because we all know if trump didnt release them they would have came up with another conspiracy
 
Without a House impeachment vote, their subpoena powers on the subject are curtailed. Just another witch hunt.

iiuc it will have to be voted on in the house then the senate is bound to act on it at that point, but that doesn’t mean there is guarantee of a trial. if it goes that far i pray members of the senate will stand with the president.
 
You do realize we have documented proof that the media has been working hand-in-hand with Democrats.

How soon people forget (or simply refuse to acknowledge) the Wikileaks emails.

FFS.
You seemed to miss the entire point. Even if some members of the media were "working hand in hand with Democrats" there are litterally 10's of thousands of media members. They're all in on the con?

How many sources did the Wikileak emails expose and what % of "the media" does that represent?
 
Amen to all!

And specifically did notable Democrats target, initiate or persuade such investigations to gain electoral advantage and hinder the Republic?

Perhaps they did, though we don’t yet have the level of proof that Trump and his team very foolishly released without a fight.[/QUOTE]

What in the call to Ukraine do you think was foolish to release? There was nothing in it remotely illegal. The Democrats announced an impeachment quiry before ever "legally" seeing the call transcript.
 
You seemed to miss the entire point. Even if some members of the media were "working hand in hand with Democrats" there are litterally 10's of thousands of media members. They're all in on the con?

How many sources did the Wikileak emails expose and what % of "the media" does that represent?



lol

Yeah, Billy Joe from the Columbus Butt**** Times is a member of the media, so pay no attention to the blue check main stream media members doing the bidding of the DNC.


Edit: mistakenly called them journalists
 
  • Like
Reactions: cat_chaser
You seemed to miss the entire point. Even if some members of the media were "working hand in hand with Democrats" there are litterally 10's of thousands of media members. They're all in on the con?

How many sources did the Wikileak emails expose and what % of "the media" does that represent?
And you miss every point. Let me rapid post a bunch of questions at you for once.

Have you read the Wikileaks emails?

Have you seen the excerpt from Ben Rhodes’ book?

Are you familiar with the Journolist scandal?

Do you think leaking debate questions to a Democrat presidential nominee is a good thing?

Do you think the DOJ/FBI using a willing media to give credibility to a phony dossier so they could use it to obtain an illegal warrant is good for this country?

Do you think you could go F*ck yourself?

You are the same person who argued the dossier was mostly credible. Please do not respond to me again until you are willing to admit you are a GD unhinged moron.
 
Last edited:
lol

Yeah, Billy Joe from the Columbus Butt**** Times is a member of the media, so pay no attention to the blue check main stream media members doing the bidding of the DNC.


Edit: mistakenly called them journalists
The whole media system is like the minor leagues ecosystem. And they move up by playing the game. The NYT hires from the like of Politico (like Maggie Halberman), they aren't looking for talent at conservative sites for sure.

And then you have all the personal relationships. The number of media people married or siblings to people in the DNC is massive, EG Ben Rhodes writing the Benghazi talking points for the Obama WH while his brother ran CBS news and fired Sheryl Atkinson for not dropping the story.
 
EFvO7TMW4AEHRwA.jpg:large
 
There was nothing in it remotely illegal.

If that’s your argument then why all the threads saying it was treason to investigate Trump?

The sitting President sought out damaging info from a foreign leader regarding a political opponent.

Hell, Trump’s been complaining about being targeted, and he gets caught targeting a political opponent!

Hell, find a transcript, recording or admission by Obama that he initiated or directed such an investigation into Trump, and then Trump would have a point!
 
Recap:

Biden's son receives money hes not qualified to get while Biden openly admits it in his own words on video. Imagine if it was don jr.

Media leaves out 500 words of transcript (one trump shouldnt have released in the first place but knew party of stunts would have went hysterical if not)

Super serious Schiff seeing that he has nothing completely makes everything up then says its "parody". Youd think if this was real he'd be straight forward about it and serious. But he knows ppl like ed will believe anything and the media will run with it.

They claim barr talking to other countries is wrong...yet it's open record that Democrats threatened to withhold aid if other countries didn't participate with Mueller. Weird. Again, they know ppl like ed believe everything his monarchs tell him.

Conspiracy theorist ed claims theres more to the transcript...but then wants nothing of Obama's flexibility to Russia transcript, nothing of his convos to Iran, none of Biden to Ukraine. Again with their stunts dems have damaged America by restricting the president to communicate with world leaders bc world leaders know dems will pull them into nonsense.

Dems have proved again, since the "blue wave" they are only power hungry. We could be working on policy. But no they have accomplished nothing except trying to take down the president. What Ed wants- kings and queens that are entitled to his tax money.

Kamala Harris has now came out that shes completely authoritarian and wants to limit speech and shut down the president's Twitter.

Dems are openly calling for the imprisonment of a political opponent (I was told was a threat to democracy) bc they cant accept election results (also was told was a threat to democracy). All bc even tho an election is a year a way...they know they cant win. Which all is dem strategy in everything. They cant persuade ppl so they have to try to destroy them. Unless you are like ed who never questions anything and cheers for them like they are a team.

The reality is, theres nothing there. There is no there, there. This again, is a small group of ppl backed by the media trying to force this on the public. Give me a real scandal. I don't even care about Biden. Its only huge bc its playing the dems game. All of this will backfire on dems. Only ppl like ed are still convinced they arent about control and power but are compassionate and caring even with zero evidence.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT