With few exceptions, the final round of public polling showed Clinton with a lead of 1 to 6 percentage points in the national popular vote. Every poll, even the state by state polls were within the stated margin of error.
Perhaps you should read this:
https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/11/09/why-2016-election-polls-missed-their-mark/
Your claim that "they were intentionally misleading" is simply hogwash. What does anyone, including the polling organizations gain by doing so?
You claimed in another post that showing that a candidate was behind might entice someone to stay home... the same can be said if you think your candidate is ahead and doesn't need your vote. What happens to teams that sometimes sit on their leads?
Lastly, if you think the polls are inaccurate, why does it bother you? Why are you worried about something you claim is meaningless???