"Breaking: President Trump will be ineligible for California's primary ballot next year unless he discloses his tax returns under a state law signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom."
Who will Trump be running against in the Primary?
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
Who will Trump be running against in the Primary?
That’s fine, no chance of winning California anyway.
Remember when Diane Feinstein had a Chinese spy one her payroll for decades and the entire left just laughed it off as lol no big deal?
Remember when the Democrat party had Hezbolah operatives running their IT operations, the operatives tried to flee to Pakistan and the left thought it was no big deal?
Remember when Obama told the Russians he’d have more flexibility to operate outside the laws of the United States after he was elected President?
Remember when the United States intelligence services worked with foreign nations to try and manufacture a case to support their coup?
Remember when the Democrat party’s most recent nominee for POTUS set up an unsecured server to store classified information freely accessible to any foreign nation that wanted it?
Those were great times for America.
Remember when the Democrat party had Hezbolah operatives running their IT operations, the operatives tried to flee to Pakistan and the left thought it was no big deal?
Remember when Obama told the Russians he’d have more flexibility to operate outside the laws of the United States after he was elected President?
Remember when the United States intelligence services worked with foreign nations to try and manufacture a case to support their coup?
Remember when the Democrat party’s most recent nominee for POTUS set up an unsecured server to store classified information freely accessible to any foreign nation that wanted it?
Those were great times for America.
What? you mean McConnell actually did work for the state he represents? He actually got a company (regardless of their origins) to invest Billions into the state and create jobs? Damn him.
Don Lemon should be ashamed of himself. An absolute pathetic low life.
I don’t understand this game of R/D politician got richer and trying to only point out the party you oppose.
Most politicians are about themselves and increase their own living conditions while in office. This isn’t a one sided issue. This is why we need some form of term limits. These people are getting rich by being “public servants” and turning it into a career.
Look at all the recent presidents and their salary vs net worth. It’s crazy. And as far as Trump goes, his net worth has actually gone down.
Russia/obstruction narrative:
Jameslee:
Jameslee:
I would rather see Comey's bitch ass go to prison than almost anybody we talk about on here...
Every teams home basketball and away football jerseys could be a sign of white supremacy.
Is your house white? You may be a racist.
If you don’t add chocolate to your milk, you may be a Nazi.
Peanut butter isn’t racist, but the bread we spread it on is.
The sun gives off light, allowing us to see white objects. The sun is racist and that’s why we need more nights.
I know several legal immigrants across the country. None of them support illegal immigration. None of them.
Interesting but I fear it'll be nothing but redactions
Because he doesn't actually live there. Only explanation. Otherwise they'd know if something was missing
What's interesting is where they get the money. They don't earn that kind of excess cash down there
I know she is popular with many on the right but what is with the oh you're asking me hard questions I don't want to answer, stop using my opponents talking points shtick?
All throughout the debates when they were asked how can they afford this stuff all economists say financially it doesn't make sense, "can we please not repeat republican talking points!" Now Gabbard using the same defense but with Kamala instead.
I actually don't see any issue with what the MSNBC host said. She asked a couple tough questions, deal with it, that should be expected when you go on these shows, even if they don't do it as consistently as they did back in the day.
In all honesty the MSNBC host handed Gabbard the same beat down as Gabbard did to Kamala. She also handled it as well, she kept saying she wanted to answer and provide context, but instead did nothing by panic and deflect.
Honestly don't get the fascination the right has with this girl. Ya she said something mean to Kamala. If you actually listen to her policies they actually might be worse than Kamala's.
I created an account on bumble yesterday it asked for my sex and the list was over 30 selections I shit you not
All these shows are just entertainment and talking heads, but damn Don Lemmon is by far the worst one. This was truly one of the worst interviews on one of these shows.
Watching the obvious shift from here is this long time black pastor, he must certainly be on my side. To realizing the guy isn't buying anything that Lemmon is selling, so you can then see the obvious change of attacking Trump to attacking this pastor because he refused to bad mouth Trump was just sad. CNN changing the chyron midway through was just beyond sad. Lemmon is just so bad at his job, it's getting to the point where I almost have sympathy for him. It's really hard to watch.
Don Lemon is an angry person. You know he wakes up every morning cursing the day is was born black. He wants to be white. He may even end up going the Michael Jackson route. Mr Lemon why not move out of your ultra white neighborhood and live like the rest of us.
Why does he live there?
“There is nothing more painful to me at this stage in my life than to walk down the street and hear footsteps... then turn around and see somebody white and feel relieved.”
― Jesse Jackson
I have no problem with the media asking uncomfortable questions and I certainly agree with you that a candidate should answer the question without the lame 'you are using my opponents talking points' crap.
I think the point was Gabbard can't do an interview and talk about any issue because they are just going to ask her about Assad over and over. But when you think about Harris, the ugly stuff about her prosecutor days is out there and has been for a while...yet the media treats her extremely well and doesn't ask those hard questions. She is getting more of the Obama type treatment at times. (Multiple executives at NBC/Comcast recently gave big donations to the Harris campaign)
Whoever has a fascination with Gabbard, it certainly isn't me...but I thank her for attacking Harris and getting a story out there the media should have already been talking about.
They call that "reporter" a "Big Lot's" tool. You can buy him cheap and you can use it until it breaks.
Ya I agree that MSNBC treats Kamala with kid gloves. I think my push back on this is, that's nothing new. So I don't get this outcry (not saying by you) of this is propoganda and all that jazz. You can go back as far as you'd like with media and you can see an obvious bias towards one candidate over anther.
I just think Gabbard handled this very poorly. "yes I want to provide context....but" deflect and deflect. Exact same thing Kamala did the other night.
A lot of people like Tulsi because she is a looker and looks good in a bikini on a surf board. You are right about the kid gloves Harris has and will receive in the future. She is a female Obama to the MSM and that means their number one job is to protect her and trash anyone who may point out just who this California senator is. They want to squash it as soon as they can. So look for them to try to run Gabbard out of the race before the next debate. Gabbard came out of the last debate as a star. She had the looks and poise and she pinned Harris down to the point of being speechless. Harris had no answer. Now the MSM must step in and clean up her act. It is important to MSNBC and CNN. This is their girl.
A
anon_l8pbkn96tg3j6
Guest
"Assad gassed his own people therefore we must rain death and destruction on the country for the next decade, you meeting with to him makes you a Russian puppet" is retarded. There are so many sides to the Syrian situation, it's insane to boil the whole thing down to "Assad bad". I believe Tulsi can articulate the situation and rejects the premise, and you can't rejection of a premise in a 3min segment when the interviewer nags you repeatedly with "but Assad bad right?"
I think that's a lot different than slamming a former prosecutor for her direct role in the drug war she claims to oppose.
Kamala is going to be the nominee IMO. Its obvious to anyone not blind that she is who the media is pushing.
They pushed for Biden and Beto at first but its clear those days are over.
I think they want Kamala cause she can say to Trump "You're racist and sexist" over and over against him. She'll just be played up as the female Obama.
They pushed for Biden and Beto at first but its clear those days are over.
I think they want Kamala cause she can say to Trump "You're racist and sexist" over and over against him. She'll just be played up as the female Obama.
California is showing once again how stupid they are. The U.S. Constitution sets the guidelines for a Presidential election. So Trumps name will be on the California ballot in the November 2020 election. The court will instruct them to do that if they balk.
No one running for President is required to show tax returns. That is a stunt some politician dreamed up. It is not law. And why should it be? Who cares how much a candidate is worth. If the IRS accepted the return why should it concern us.
It is difficult to find a politician of either party who has not become a millionaire if they served more than one term. Democrats actually have the highest income among the congress men and women. Senate and House.
This is actually a positive for Trump. He was already rich and did not run to become rich and powerful. He was both before he entered the race.
Then Gabbard should do at least one of two things (preferably both)
1. Give the classic politician answer and articulate that subject is far too complex for a 2 minute sound bite. Provide a place where people can go to see her entire point of view on the subject. Pin it to the top of her Twitter or something
2. If she is going to run for president and go on these shows, she knows this is going to be asked. What she needs to do is take the complicated subject matter and find a simplistic way of being able to answer it in a 2-3 minute segment.
Ideally she does both, gives a simplistic answer then says it is a very complex situation, I have a full breakdown on the subject on my Twitter.
All of that is a lot better than, "yes I want to provide context....but this sure sounds like a Kamala talking point."It was a really bad deflect on her side.
But whoever they choose has to eventually share a stage with Donald Trump. No matter who the hosts are they won't be able to protect the Democrat from his exposure of them on the issues.
Last edited:
And that my friend will be for themBut whoever they choose has to eventually share a stage with Donald Trump. No matter who the hosts are they won't be able to protect the Democrat from his exposure of them on the issues.
Latest posts
-
Matthew langhi 6ft5 small forward soph marshall co
- Latest: berniecarbo
-
