The media has gone batshit crazy. The great newsmen of old are probably rolling in their graves
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
The media has gone batshit crazy. The great newsmen of old are probably rolling in their graves
Quit being disingenuous and do that with every politician. You will find that the dems gained more. FACT!
Lol, the federal investigation into Epstein is about child molesting democrats, not Trump. Lol. Nice try.
The Donald is #SurroundedByCriminals
Over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
again.
Over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
and over
again.
I would snap you old rusty hip is anout 5 seconds. Interesting you want to piss on me. I'll pass freak show.
First, I don't answer to you. F that.
Calling out means sitting there and letting their party leaders say stupid sh!t & being quiet w/o ever saying I disagree/They're wrong.
I tell people who say they will vote against Trump because they can't stand him/hate him that I don't like him either but that he does great things for the country. Happened today in fact.
You want more, tough sh!t.
Breaking tonight. John Solomon of The Hill can confirm John Durham has received an audio tape deposition from Joseph Mifsud. Mifsud says why he targeted Papadopoulos and who directed him to do so. He also confirmed that the Senate judiciary committee has received the same deposition.
lol
Wrong. The DOJ says a sitting president cannot be charged. If Trump didn't do anything wrong, just have Barr waive that judgement. Seems simple enough.
Not wrong. You seem to be conflating as well. Just because the OLC limited Mueller from indicting (charge) him doesn't mean he couldn't have made a criminal referral or recommendation to the DOJ.
And Barr already waived the ultimate judgment. He along with Rosenstein and DOJ lawyers reviewed Mueller's evidence and concluded the evidence was insufficient. Case closed.
Russia is the new racist. Man they're teetering on empty.
Dems’ Obsession With Winning ‘Woke’ Votes
Why, asks Robby Soave at Reason, are the Democratic candidates trying so hard to win over racially hypersensitive voters? Wednesday night’s debate “felt like it was taking place inside the classroom of a critical-theory instructor,” as multiple candidates “confessed their various privileges,” from Gov. Jay Inslee “admitting that he had no idea what it felt like to be a black teenager” to Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand “vowing to berate suburban white women for being insufficiently woke.” Reality check: Surveys show that “more than 80 percent of people despise political correctness,” while “the number of Americans who think people should routinely check their privilege constitute a tiny minority.”
Why the DCCC’s Purge of Whites Matters
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee’s purge this week of top white staffers is “more shocking” than people realize, a Washington Examiner editorial argues. Either some Democrats “are making a racial issue out of a patronage question,” or they are “genuinely angry that half the [staffers] at the DCCC are white.” Either way, “this is not a party fit to govern.” Indeed, “if an organization is actually willing to fire you from your job just because you’re white, do you really want to be involved with it?” Yes, voting trends suggest Democrats can’t win in most states without “90 percent of the black vote and vast majorities” of other minority voting blocs. But, asks the Examiner, “is that a realistic strategy in the long run?”
Sanity Lost the Dem Debate
At this week’s Democratic debates, Roger Kimball at Spectator USA sighs, “an occasional bubble of sanity rose to the surface and expired in a satisfying eructation.” The problem: “Such little pops were emitted by the debaters of whom no one had heard of before . . . and surely no one will hear of again.” And the loudest voices — the likes of Sens. Bernie Sanders and Liz Warren — issued “socialist nostrums,” the essence of which was “let’s give lots of stuff away!” Meanwhile, the CNN moderators added their “usual even-handedness,” opening “several questions with such gambits as ‘the president’s racist rhetoric’ or ‘after the president’s racist tweets.’ At least we knew where we stood.” Not that the two evenings were without their consolations: “I liked Bill de Blasio’s frankness: ‘We will tax the hell out of the wealthy.’ ” And the “entertainment also featured a small mercy. Cory Booker didn’t break into Spanish in order to pander to the Hispanic vote. That was nice.”
Why, asks Robby Soave at Reason, are the Democratic candidates trying so hard to win over racially hypersensitive voters? Wednesday night’s debate “felt like it was taking place inside the classroom of a critical-theory instructor,” as multiple candidates “confessed their various privileges,” from Gov. Jay Inslee “admitting that he had no idea what it felt like to be a black teenager” to Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand “vowing to berate suburban white women for being insufficiently woke.” Reality check: Surveys show that “more than 80 percent of people despise political correctness,” while “the number of Americans who think people should routinely check their privilege constitute a tiny minority.”
Why the DCCC’s Purge of Whites Matters
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee’s purge this week of top white staffers is “more shocking” than people realize, a Washington Examiner editorial argues. Either some Democrats “are making a racial issue out of a patronage question,” or they are “genuinely angry that half the [staffers] at the DCCC are white.” Either way, “this is not a party fit to govern.” Indeed, “if an organization is actually willing to fire you from your job just because you’re white, do you really want to be involved with it?” Yes, voting trends suggest Democrats can’t win in most states without “90 percent of the black vote and vast majorities” of other minority voting blocs. But, asks the Examiner, “is that a realistic strategy in the long run?”
Sanity Lost the Dem Debate
At this week’s Democratic debates, Roger Kimball at Spectator USA sighs, “an occasional bubble of sanity rose to the surface and expired in a satisfying eructation.” The problem: “Such little pops were emitted by the debaters of whom no one had heard of before . . . and surely no one will hear of again.” And the loudest voices — the likes of Sens. Bernie Sanders and Liz Warren — issued “socialist nostrums,” the essence of which was “let’s give lots of stuff away!” Meanwhile, the CNN moderators added their “usual even-handedness,” opening “several questions with such gambits as ‘the president’s racist rhetoric’ or ‘after the president’s racist tweets.’ At least we knew where we stood.” Not that the two evenings were without their consolations: “I liked Bill de Blasio’s frankness: ‘We will tax the hell out of the wealthy.’ ” And the “entertainment also featured a small mercy. Cory Booker didn’t break into Spanish in order to pander to the Hispanic vote. That was nice.”
You do realize that the mill is going to employ Kentuckians? They will receive a good medium wage income. Probably several hundred workers, not including the local support system that will benefit.
His report and his words clearly state he investigated so Congress would be the party to decide if they should do their constitutional duty. He believed his hands were tied by the OLC as some other prosecutors second guessed that idea believing he had every right to indict.
But that would have required testimony from Fat Nixon himself and he wasn't prepared to play the waiting game. He knew lawyers would drag this out and said so in testimony. Anything that suggests otherwise is just another lie. Something your man excels at frequently.
Why are we accepting investments from a country being sanctioned? How much money exchanged hands for this Russian investment and who was compensated?
He couldn’t indict, but this notion he couldn’t say the president broke the law is nuts.
He specifically stated there was no obstruction or impedance in his investigation.
What do you think he described that was actual obstruction?
We aren’t receiving it from a country, there is a difference between a Russian and the Russian govt. You do realize that, right?
There’s a steel mill right down the road from me owned by a Brazilian. They are intentionally keeping it idled.
You're a loon. It's comical you still haven't caught on yet. Trump isn't going to be impeached and he darn sure isn't getting charged with obstruction.
The same people who lied to your for 3 years about collusion are the same people lying to you now. And what do you know here you are convinced of and regurgitating their lies exactly like did with collusion. Genius. How simple are you?
Trump can always have Barr waive the OLC's judgement so the 11 counts in the report can be settled in court. Fat Nixon has never been afraid of the justice system and lawyers believe the OLC has a weak case to begin with.
Yeah why are they?
Deripaska is a very powerful/influential Russian oligarch with very close ties to Putin/Kremlin.
Another Russian oligarch named Blavatnik lives in the U.S. (NYC) and is Deripaska's business partner.
Why was House Ds Campaign Committee (DCCC) still taking Blavatnik's campaign donations after 2016 and as recent as '18?
During and since '16 Blavatnik has written multiple big dollar checks to Schumer, Gottheimer, Kander, Cory Booker, Biden, Manchin, Rahm Emanuel and of course Hillary Clinton. Also the DCCC ($64,800), another $61,300 to the DNC and $86,200 to the DSCC.
After he had maxed out to Kander he gave the Missouri Democratic State Committee $10,000 to spend on Kander's failed Senate campaign. Kathleen Rice was another D who got big multiple contributions from Blavatnik.
Then why did Moscow Mitch need to get Rusal removed from the 2018 sanctions? lol
Are you saying that Mueller lied while under oath? That means he committed perjury correct? Which also means what little credibility he had is now crap. Which also means his report is crap. Great job.
Gee..maybe bc his wife's wealthy parent passed away. You followed those bread crumbs real hard
Whyd you deflect there? Did Obama get them? Hey wasnt Obama president in 2016? What happened here:
It's you that's super concerned about $ from Russia but only where it concerns Rs. Don't change the subject when I smack you around with your own hypocrisy.
City in CA voting to become a 2A sanctuary city. They see it as if liberal CA cities can ignore federal immigration laws then they can ignore state gun laws.
Last edited:
Thank goodness the Chinese have stayed out of our economy.
Seriously, NOW you have scruples about clean foreign investment?
In other “cities being stupid” news...
I just learned east Pittsburgh successfully disbanded their police department. They have no police. You can’t make this up.
A Sanction is a penalty. Look it up. An instrument of foreign policy and economic pressure. There wouldn't continue to be any pressure if the Russians were profiting from the country levying the sanctions.
And yet the lemmings promote the idea of the president being tough on Russia. Tough on crime. ![[roll]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/roll.r191677.gif "roll [roll]")
Is the president above the law? Would an ordinary billionaire rapist who WASN'T president be allowed to get away with circumventing the legal process? Only questions you and every republican need to be asking themselves.
