No problem with that but taking it away from the wealthy would be a temporary fix at best. Give a solution that does not involve taking money away from people.
So you don't want to give up more money, the same as everyone else, unless people with guns come and make you. That's tyranny bub. That's why we left England.
And if all the rich gave away their money, it would change very little if anything for the poor in the long term. Part of what builds sustainable wealth is a series of making good decisions and knowing how to manage the money you have. Many poor people make it big in life. Ever notice how many lottery winners end up bankrupt?
She plays for you national team who tomorrow is trying to show they are the best soccer team on earth.
That's called laissez-faire capitalism. We've tried it before, it freaking sucks.
They control the funds they donate to or decide who controls them. It's not like they're giving tot he Red Cross or such. And they still have multi times more than they give.
Yeah, well, that's just, you know, like your opinion man.
Wow, Gordon Ramsey is looking rough these days
She's playing for a team that represents a country she hates so that she can gain the advancements that come with it. She's a hypocrite and a narcissist.
False, it works if we keep liberal politicians out of the decision making. Like their followers, they do nothing and expect rewards and compensation for just being.
Well most people can figure that if it is happening there it will most likely happen everywhere with a some exceptions. As stated before, anecdotal evidence is many times a microcosm of a larger picture.
.
