Don’t let them in to begin with. That’s a pretty simple solution.
LOL LOL LOL LOL goddamn
Don’t let them in to begin with. That’s a pretty simple solution.
There are 100s of thousands approaching and attempting to cross the unprotected southern border. Should we use live ammo to stop them? Trump has worked with Mexico, attempted to fully fund the wall, sent troops, ... They still get in. And who have we seen organizing these large caravans??? The f**king leftists. Once they get in, they can't simply be deported. That sad situation is where we are. We need democrat support to fix this huge problem and we aren't getting it.Don’t let them in to begin with. That’s a pretty simple solution. I couldnt just walk across the Ambassador bridge from Windsor to Detroit and be let in with no passport. They would laugh at me and send me back across. Why is it any different at the southern border?
I fully support exposing the liberal double standard of open arms we will take your poor but don’t put them near me thy are disgusting , you people take them and if you don’t you are a racist and hate brown people. Do you understand that calling people racist and quoting scripture to guilt others and then when they come to you you say piss off is a bit ****ed up?
There are 100s of thousands approaching and attempting to cross the unprotected southern border. Should we use live ammo to stop them? Trump has worked with Mexico, attempted to fully fund the wall, sent troops, ... They still get in. And who have we seen organizing these large caravans??? The f**king leftists. Once they get in, they can't simply be deported. That sad situation is where we are. We need democrat support to fix this huge problem and we aren't getting it.
And what happens when one of those people leaves whatever city they were dumped in and commits a crime in your town? It’s not like we are going to equip them with exploding collars that will blow their heads off if they leave Cook County.
I prefer shot.Yes do it bus them in and give them some federal money as long as they stay in a sanctuary city they are ok....if they venture out they will be deported
They have already been getting in and waiting for their court dates and not showing up. So, give them court dates in sanctuary cities that you take them to and let them deal with it.How is "let them in" an option? Are these special illegal immigrants? I honestly don't get it at all. I thought there were immigration laws.
I hit the like button furiously for about a minute and still only got to give one like.John, they are already killing legal citizens in "our towns". Goddamn. Stick them in sanctuary cities until liberals help change the laws and cut federal funding to those cities.
I might support that, but the liberals are already screaming about the illegals not getting 4 star accommodations, free healthcare, free education, free (you name it). It's irrational conditioning to hate our country and support it's demise. While your approach is pragmatic, we'd have to also start killing the leftists in this country. It would be all out civil war.Ok now we are getting somewhere. This is much more constructive than saying “**** you, go back to Canada.”
Honestly? Yes, use live Ammo. Make an example of a few and it will stop. Make it abundantly clear with signs, announcements, whatever it takes, that you will not be allowed in and deadly force will be used if you attempt to enter.
Then how do they stay? About a million a year it is now being reported.It's really not hard to say "don't let them in, they are here illegally" you all are being ridiculous
Either you are too dumb to see how this could work or pissed that it will.It’s the Trump effect. Had a dem senator proposed this, the resident peanut gallery here would be calling that person a traitor. Since it was Trump’s idea, it’s basically gospel.
Could help take some of them out in the murder capital of the world.We don't want illegals dude lol, put them in Chicago
He will not give one, as I said before his liberal slip shows when real moves are made that goes against the liberal agenda.Stop pretending to be stupid. The wall isn't fully built yet and the laws need to be changed. The goalposts haven't moved at all. We're stuck in a shit situation and this is simply a move to awaken the idiots who vote for this insanity. Still waiting to hear your suggestions.
I agree but, until the wall is built, where do you send the ones who keep getting in? Solution? To the ones who say they want them but are now saying they don't want them there.We spent 2 years taking about a wall, losing, and now we're talking about bussing illegal immigrants to Chicago as if it's some sort of victory on immigration. I definitely still support the wall, this is completely insane.
He will not give one, as I said before his liberal slip shows when real moves are made that goes against the liberal agenda.
So you’re a proponent of just letting a bunch of unvetted illegals into the US, at which point they’d be free to move around anywhere they want to?
Just because you dump a bunch of people in Chicago doesn’t mean they will all stay there. If they head a few hours south we could end up with another Bowling Green Massacre. If you claim to be a nationalist (I’m not saying you do,) you should be vehemently against allowing illegals into any city or area of the US.
They are coming anyway, let them start in Chicago or some other sanctuary city first. Maybe they will get stopped before they even get out of Chicago, know what I mean.And what happens when one of those people leaves whatever city they were dumped in and commits a crime in your town? It’s not like we are going to equip them with exploding collars that will blow their heads off if they leave Cook County.
The standard stop them at the border was stupid because your people have blocked that so, no real answer.I did, and you ignored it, dumbass![]()
I've been working round the clock the past two weeks, so maybe I'm out of the loop, but is the policy to just continue to let them flood into the country unmitigated, but filter them to sanctuary cities? That's retarded if so.
If the choice is to secure the border, and send the ones who make it in (despite our efforts to stop them and if we can't deport them because of stupid laws) to sanctuary cities, that's a different story.
District 9We need a final solution on illegal immigration
That’s why I’ve been saying all along that building a wall without changing the laws is stupid. Now it seems the solution is just to say **** it, let them all in, let’s even give them free transportation!
Unless Trump plans on building walls around all of these sanctuary cities to keep all the illegals in, this seems like a terrible plan to me.
Here it is folks, most of us in these threads think they should come in the legal way. Those who do not should be immediately deported but since they are not, those awaiting court hearings should wait in sanctuary cites pure and simple.
Here it is folks, most of us in these threads think they should come in the legal way. Those who do not should be immediately deported but since they are not, those awaiting court hearings should wait in sanctuary cites pure and simple.
Like 9-11?
I've been working round the clock the past two weeks, so maybe I'm out of the loop, but is the policy to just continue to let them flood into the country unmitigated, but filter them to sanctuary cities? That's retarded if so.
If the choice is to secure the border, and send the ones who make it in (despite our efforts to stop them and if we can't deport them because of stupid laws) to sanctuary cities, that's a different story.
Applying yes, coming across and not making your court date (which most are not) or sneaking in is illegal. Plus, most are not really seeking asylum, that is a cop out excuse the left is using for you lemmings.Applying for asylum is still legal, right?
They have to be released somewhere per the SC. What better choice is there than with people who want them?How is Trump putting illegal immigrants in sanctuary cities a good thing?
Applying yes, coming across and not making your court date (which most are not) or sneaking in is illegal. Plus, most are not really seeking asylum, that is a cop out excuse the left is using for you lemmings.
Hard to believe the 9th did that. Has to be way legal for that to have happened.The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled to uphold the Trump administration's policy on making asylum seekers wait for their court hearings in Mexico, as opposed to the United States.
Falls? Falls! But it is from Reuters. Should not be surprised.
Do you have proof they are all applying and are under the reasons/guidelines needed to get asylum? Are you privy to information about all of these refugees/illegals that the rest of the nation is not? If so, should you not be headed to the border to help these people? Perhaps you can take some dope/drugs/alcohol and party with them while they wait.Applying for asylum is still legal, right?
Well it depends on which southern border you're talking about. If it's Windsor Falls, Canada law doesn't allow it. If it's the US, our asylum law does. The latter is F-ed up.Don’t let them in to begin with. That’s a pretty simple solution. I couldnt just walk across the Ambassador bridge from Windsor to Detroit and be let in with no passport. They would laugh at me and send me back across. Why is it any different at the southern border?
Don't think they are violating law or they'd be prosecuted.Yes to cities who are in direct violation of the law they are called sanctuary cities that house violators of the law, and if they will not comply then we will take you at your word and give you more of them , you are a completely full of shit
What rule of law, federal or state?Don't think they are violating law or they'd be prosecuted.
Not funny.We need a final solution on illegal immigration