ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
34053972_438380969935307_2248796184141365248_n.jpg
 
One of the flimsy reasons is there are so many politicians on both sides of the aisle from several countries that may be embarrassed or worse.
53298636_2062917527097503_5269547658099294208_n.jpg
 
Calling people names is not debating. I actually had a good conversation with Castle Rubric here not long ago, I'm not sure I've ever had one with you. I scan comments to look for reasonable people here, people who don't simply demean others and there are scant few.

Pretty telling you can only point to a single instance "not long ago" where you actually engaged.

One.
 
https://amp.businessinsider.com/mat...truman-refueling-2019-3?utm_source=reddit.com

Interesting and important debate. Mattis & now his replacement, Shanahan, don't believe in aircraft carriers and have begun policy change to phase them out. It's a tricky situation to replace the big role they fill. They can project a massive amount of air power but are now huge & easy targets in modern warfare. There is no reliable defense against current iterations of anti-ship missiles. Imagine the hit the Navy would take in a war where multiple carriers were sunk. Is it better to have 1 carrier or a dozen destroyers/cruiser/subs?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bill Derington
Pretty telling you can only point to a single instance "not long ago" where you actually engaged.

One.
Well like I said there are not many on here who are capable of speaking to someone they have disagreements without resorting to name calling and schoolyard banter. There is really way too much of that in public discourse now. It's as if there is some sort of third entity nourishing such directionless and wasteful tripe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wildcatsboston1984
People here can't even understand defense and offense, and yet they wonder why I won't engage. They just can't understand how talking to them is a waste of time. LOL
 
I'm so glad my mind is not f**ked up and my character is not debased like these leftists lunatics. Science needs to do studies and find how to treat, if possible, the leftist disorder. It's a very horrible disease which destroys entire societies.
Very true. The most recent society it has destroyed in Venezuela. Once a wealthy nation that just had to try the cute socialism the left adores. Now it is a sh** hole. Just like some places in our once great cities of American.
 
Very true. The most recent society it has destroyed in Venezuela. Once a wealthy nation that just had to try the cute socialism the left adores. Now it is a sh** hole. Just like some places in our once great cities of American.
Again I impressed by how little you know of our history and the way we treat countries south of our border as something little more than a dog turd we stepped on. Do you know who Luis Posada Carriles is? Do you know that history that includes Oliver North's gun running operation? Do you know why these things pissed Venezuela off so much? Do you know about how we deployed civilian terrorists? some from Venezuela? My bet is you don't know squat and your time spent reading is the funny papers on the toilet. I concur Venezuela has a very shaky government but I also know about SOA and all the crap we pull south of our border that makes for these situations. Mostly for oil which is what Venezuela has plenty of. Why don't you start reading something of value and actually know something you can add to a discussion other than memorized claptrap from the very people who cause most of these problems?
 
People here can't even understand defense and offense, and yet they wonder why I won't engage. They just can't understand how talking to them is a waste of time. LOL
I understand why you don't engage. Its because you're scared you'll get exposed as a fraud and you're a coward.
 
  • Like
Reactions: warrior-cat
Get your nutcases in line, Rs.
https://www.azcentral.com/story/new...s-communist/3018342002/?cid=twitter_azcentral

Signing her post, "live free or die," state Rep. Kelly Townsend went on Facebook Thursday to decry mandatory vaccinations as a communist idea.

One day after Republican Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey said he was "pro-vaccination,"Townsend, a Mesa Republican, wrote that she'd heard about proposals to "force" people in Arizona to be vaccinated.

"The idea that we force someone to give up their liberty for the sake of the collective is not based on American values but rather, Communist (sic)," she wrote.

Disregarding warnings from health officials, the state House Health and Human Services Committee last week endorsed three bills that could lead to lower immunization coverage among Arizona's schoolchildren.
 
Get your nutcases in line, Rs.
https://www.azcentral.com/story/new...s-communist/3018342002/?cid=twitter_azcentral

Signing her post, "live free or die," state Rep. Kelly Townsend went on Facebook Thursday to decry mandatory vaccinations as a communist idea.

One day after Republican Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey said he was "pro-vaccination,"Townsend, a Mesa Republican, wrote that she'd heard about proposals to "force" people in Arizona to be vaccinated.

"The idea that we force someone to give up their liberty for the sake of the collective is not based on American values but rather, Communist (sic)," she wrote.

Disregarding warnings from health officials, the state House Health and Human Services Committee last week endorsed three bills that could lead to lower immunization coverage among Arizona's schoolchildren.
False.
 
Get your nutcases in line, Rs.
https://www.azcentral.com/story/new...s-communist/3018342002/?cid=twitter_azcentral

Signing her post, "live free or die," state Rep. Kelly Townsend went on Facebook Thursday to decry mandatory vaccinations as a communist idea.

One day after Republican Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey said he was "pro-vaccination,"Townsend, a Mesa Republican, wrote that she'd heard about proposals to "force" people in Arizona to be vaccinated.

"The idea that we force someone to give up their liberty for the sake of the collective is not based on American values but rather, Communist (sic)," she wrote.

Disregarding warnings from health officials, the state House Health and Human Services Committee last week endorsed three bills that could lead to lower immunization coverage among Arizona's schoolchildren.


So people should be forced to inject chemicals into their bodies if the state deems it's for the common good?

Where does it stop? You lefties support the government forcing me to buy a product I don't want or need (health insurance).

Can we also start to force people to have babies if the state deems it's for the common good?
 
Living rent free in your head I see.
Not at all, you Platnidumb, Levi'sbooty, and Jameslie are attention whores and negative propaganda spreaders spouting "Trumped" up lies and or exaggerated stories involving Trump and conservatives. If one was to be living in someones head it would have to be Trump in yours and their heads, The non-stop propaganda is the proof of that. I simply remind people how fake and false most of it is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sawnee Cat
At the risk of trying to sound "woke" you goddam lefties are too goddam stupid to understand what you're doing. I honestly think you guys really are just being taken advantage of and don't realize it.

You supported the federal government forcing people to buy products they don't want with Obamacare. You were told forcing people to buy insurance was for the common good, so we should accept the fact the federal government can force us to buy it if we don't want it.

You support forcing people to inject chemicals into their body against their will. Sure, it's under the guise of the "common good", but most of us understand this is just a first step. Sure vaccinations are great, but what else is the government going to start forcing you to put in your body for the common good.

You're being taken advantage of on abortion. These laws that are being passed quiet literally allow murdering babies after birth. But you've been told to argue no one on the left would be that crazy, even though they are. This is all just a set up for RBG's court departure when the left can frame the right as anti-sane abortion rather than anti-baby murder like you guys are trying to push.

Someone is going to come along to say the "slippery slope" is a logical fallacy. But it's not. Not when you live in a common law country with a legal system based on precedent. You all accept the slow (and sometimes rapid) erosion of your individual liberties because you're too goddam gullible to see the forest for the trees.
 
So people should be forced to inject chemicals into their bodies if the state deems it's for the common good?

Where does it stop? You lefties support the government forcing me to buy a product I don't want or need (health insurance).

Can we also start to force people to have babies if the state deems it's for the common good?
giphy.gif


So where do you draw the line then at not supporting services that are for the common good? Should we not pay taxes to support law enforcement, fire fighters, postal service, schools, health department, etc.?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT