Here's the headline to a Maggie Haberman NYT piece about Omarosa. This is what most will see and read, especially those on Twitter since tweets only show the headline.
But, if you actually read the story, buried eight paragraphs down they give a small, four sentence reference to the truth in a 30 paragraph article...
Frank Luntz, the veteran Republican pollster who Ms. Manigault Newman says was believed to have told people he heard Mr. Trump utter the epithet, posted on Twitter to deny that had happened and to point out that he had not been contacted by the author.
This is another perfect example of how dishonest and fake the media is. They highlight the negative and damaging stuff regardless of it being true or not. They have no problem reporting lies and slander as long as they're negative for Trump.
This is an article that should have never been written. There's zero proof to back up Omarosa's claim and her only source, who has much more credibility than her, flat out denies it to the point of claiming he was never even contacted and asked about it.
Even if this article had to be written because it was the news of the day, then it should've been framed entirely differently
.