You literally said, "That's why I said 'basic human right'." I understand the difference between a human right and constitutional right. But you've never once shown how free healthcare is either of those. I've been using "right" in the broadest sense the entire time; never once relying on the mere Constitutionality of it. My argument is that free healthcare is not a "right", period. It can't, logically, be a right because it requires a third party.
So, again, can you explain under what philosophical framework can you have a right to a service? Please note that you are the one you thinks saying "health care is a basic human right" means you aren't calling health care a right