Omarossa or Bannon or Sessions or Mucci or Priebus or Spicer?One of Trump’s biggest mistakes was bringing that crazy bafoon into the White House
Omarossa or Bannon or Sessions or Mucci or Priebus or Spicer?One of Trump’s biggest mistakes was bringing that crazy bafoon into the White House
Whoa. Take a step back, son. Recording conversations where known classified information was to be and is discussed is legal? I don't think so.And would idiots stop saying what Omarossa did is illegal. Just like with Cohen, taping is legal in DC. She's a piece of trash, perfect for Trump, but she didn't break any law.
When you are new at politics, you make mistakes. Who do you like in the Trump administration?Omarossa or Bannon or Sessions or Mucci or Priebus or Spicer?
So you're saying single mothers who grew up in poor families with minimum education are greedier than Jeffry Skilling, Bernie Madoff, Michael Milken, John Keating, Andrew Fastow, Dennis Koslowski, Bernard Ebbers, Kenneth Lay, etc. etc. etc.Curious that you would say that. Because it is the essential greed of man that compels individuals NOT do their part to advance the entire people as a whole, to slack and ride the coattails of others, to become complacent and unambitious in the absence of personal incentive, that is the downfall of socialist/communist systems.
I love how mad you guys are that Levi is posting memes when you have a couple posters on here (@AustinTXCat) that does almost exclusively that.
I'm convinced now for sure. I'm voting dem in 2020.
Always a good thing when these people are fired, but I won't be fully satisfied til these people are put in hand cuffs.Comey, McCabe, Strzok...all gone from the FBI...at least that part of the swamp is being drained.
I'm convinced now for sure. I'm voting dem in 2020.
Not true. What she did is illegal. Its a national security risk. She should go to prison for it. You can't just go around recording shit in the freaking White House.And would idiots stop saying what Omarossa did is illegal. Just like with Cohen, taping is legal in DC. She's a piece of trash, perfect for Trump, but she didn't break any law.
Platinum is dumb as f**k.Whoa. Take a step back, son. Recording conversations where known classified information was to be and is discussed is legal? I don't think so.
Did I say ANYTHING about comparative greed, anyone being "greedier" than anyone else? Straw man much?So you're saying single mothers who grew up in poor families with minimum education are greedier than Jeffry Skilling, Bernie Madoff, Michael Milken, John Keating, Andrew Fastow, Dennis Koslowski, Bernard Ebbers, Kenneth Lay, etc. etc. etc.
I think you've lost your friggin mind. That's the dumbest thing anybody may have ever posted here. You're so singularly tracked stupid with this comment you even forgot to make exceptions for the Clintons and Obama's. Sorry to be so blunt and honest with you but that really was stupid.
Hope Hicks is hot....oh wait.When you are new at politics, you make mistakes. Who do you like in the Trump administration?
I'm actually not entirely opposed to the paid time off thing. We need to start encouraging people to have kids.
recording something classified is not illegal. Not disclosing the recording after something classified is discussed or releasing something classified is where you break the law. Most presidents have setup some form of recording systems in the white house because DC law allows one party consent. The White House doesn't have its own set of laws. You can argue Amarossa broke employee policy but that still is not something illegal. It does show a severe lack of proper security procedure in the current WH.Whoa. Take a step back, son. Recording conversations where known classified information was to be and is discussed is legal? I don't think so.
Meh. There's so much wrapped into the modern economy and society that it is hard just to pull out one thing without it affecting others, I understand that. So, financial security is important to child rearing, but I think the idea that you need to be anything other than "not poor" to have a good size family is a failing of modern culture. You can absolutely raise a large family on not a lot of money and not resort to leaching off the government.I'd actually prefer you not to have any children if you can't afford to take some time off work.
"You" as in everyone.
recording something classified is not illegal. releasing something classified is where you break the law. Most presidents have setup some form of recording systems in the white house because DC law allows one party consent. The White House doesn't have its own set of laws. You can argue Amarossa broke employee policy but that still is not something illegal. It does show a severe lack of proper security procedure in the current WH.
I'm actually not entirely opposed to the paid time off thing. We need to start encouraging people to have kids.
That said, it's not because parenting is a collective duty or whatever that idiot is on about.
The market is better at 95% of things than government. Especially when the government is any form of amoral democracy or republic. But, given what we know about what close/strong families can do for a society, I don't think you can compare encouraging that vs. some productivity numbers.Let the market shake it out, which with 95% of things, fixes things. The better companies will offer it and they will subsequently get better talent. Or maybe they won't. But I am not a fan of forcing companies to do anything
So you are positing that when I make paper or digital copies of classified information, and I am not telling anyone that I am doing so, that act in and of itself is not illegal? It's only when I share with others that I am doing something illegal?recording something classified is not illegal. releasing something classified is where you break the law. Most presidents have setup some form of recording systems in the white house because DC law allows one party consent. The White House doesn't have its own set of laws. You can argue Amarossa broke employee policy but that still is not something illegal. It does show a severe lack of proper security procedure in the current WH.
DC is one party consent. If you don't know beforehand that someone is going to discus classified information there is zero chance you will be charged for the recording. Big difference between a voice recording and taking pictures, one is a very deliberate offense. And so far as we know Omarossa didn't record anything classified. And if she had whoever it was with her would be breaking the law because she had no security clearance.You cannot record something classified, whether you release it or not.
If you get caught taking pictures of classified documents your ass is going to jail.
Making copies of classified documents is not the same thing as recording conversations. Nixon recorded dozens of classified conversations, how many was he charged with? Same with Reagan, most likely the same with Clinton but they were never able to compel him to release anything.So you are positing that when I make paper or digital copies of classified information, and I am not telling anyone that I am doing so, that act in and of itself is not illegal? It's only when I share with others that I am doing something illegal?