POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
I would love for us to lower military spending and dump that savings into paying down the debt. But that will never happen because conservatives aren't actually conservative and liberals are to scared to ask for defense cuts.
A lib acting like he cares about debt
![[roll]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/roll.r191677.gif "roll [roll]")
https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/pdf_2017_06/20170629_170629-pr2017-111-en.pdf
Read NATO's own numbers on military spending. You can post any stupid quote you want, doesn't make it true. spending in 2014 was 942billion. spending in 2017 was 945billion. are you brain dead enough to think an increase of 3 billion is double?
Yes, they are. They can't even articulate how it makes sense. I swear to God, these people are brainwashed. "Trump won cause of Russian fake Facebook ads and now he's Putin's puppet." Why in the hell would Putin want a pro-American guy in there instead of a globalist shill he can buy off like the Clintons and do whatever he wants like he did when Obama was in office? Makes no sense.
But because these people are in a giant echo chamber, they're convinced that everyone online is a Russian bot and a Nazi. They don't know conservatives in their world so the idea of losing was so preposterous to them.
A lib acting like he cares about debt
OMG. These people. Obama took us to $21T in debt, spent more than any president in history, loves entitlements and growing the welfare state and wants an endless stream of government dependent illegals coming across the border.
They don't give a shit about debt.
Democrat Jeffries bringing up David Duke for no reason...he is probably one of the black democrats who has met with Louis Farrakhan.
Like how Republicans keep yielding time to Trey Gowdy...Strzok says no bias despite using the word impeachment immediately...Gowdy was saying that isnt normal for someone investigating an issue to use that word immediately who hasn’t even started the process of an investigation.
Like how Republicans keep yielding time to Trey Gowdy...Strzok says no bias despite using the word impeachment immediately...Gowdy was saying that isnt normal for someone investigating an issue to use that word immediately who hasn’t even started the process of an investigation.
Remember how the left hated American Sniper Chris Kyle and Facebook even told their employees to manipulate the trending topics so he's never included? It's interesting who they hate and who they idolize. I have no problem calling them anti-American scum.
Seth Rogen likened that movie to Nazi propaganda. SMH.
Seth Rogen likened that movie to Nazi propaganda. SMH.
Last edited:
Sweet. That's the graph from the link that YOU provided. I'm not going to say much about the classical "your an idiot" response. It speaks for itself.
What the graph shows is an increase in production during the Trump administration that far surpasses the O'bama debacle. If you wanted to be honest and accurate with your statement, you would have said " in SPITE of O'bama's efforts, oil production was able to rise due to the enduring benefits of capitalism".
You are the idiot here and there is really no debate about it. You allow others to think for you because you are too naïve to understand that they do not have your best interests in mind. You are a minion who deserves no respect beyond the fact that you are a human being.
And by the way, have an adult explain to you that the graph shows a TIMELINE and 9000 is the lowest number that needs to be represented within that frame. Check out your MMGW graphs and then get back to me.
Later, son.
In 2 years production has gone up 10%. in 8 years under Obama it went up 90%. do math numbnuts.
So now that the "conservatives" are in power we going to fix that debt? **** no. we instead are going to rapidly increase the debt during a booming economy and will be ****ed when the recession hits next year.
You libs have zero credibility when speaking about debt. Zero. Your guy spent 10 trillion dollars in just 8 years. If Trump spends 10 trillion during his TWO terms then you can speak. Until then STFU.
PlatinumLoser, Obama fought against fossil fuels including oil & gas. Quit trying to give him credit for increases during his time in office. Market forces won out over his green energy pipe dreams.
The leftist definition of debt is when I get to keep a dollar instead of giving it to federal bureaucrats to spend as a tax dollar.
Yeah such a stupid quote. It was only said by the US Ambassador to Nato. Again you're outdated. What you linked is from June '17. This is July '18. She just made these comments on live tv on Sunday. You're right though she's lying and not and not a single liberal rag has fact checked her on it. imagine that.
You know, I'm going to refrain from the name calling in your case, much for the same reason I wouldn't laugh if an invalid fell down the steps in front of me. I pity you. You are at the point that you have garnered my pity. Congratulations on that. Tough row to hoe.
O'bama is considered to be the worst president in history as far as blocking US efforts of oil, gas, and coal production. This is not debatable and I'll be damned if I'm going to take the weeks to show you ALL the info to back that claim up.
As I said, In SPITE of O'bama, oil production was able to rise. It did not rise 90%. Trump has made an attempt at laissez faire when it comes to energy production and the benefits are becoming more apparent with each day.
As I've asked you before, please refrain from addressing me directly. Continue to relay your ill-placed thoughts and I will let you know each time you veer from reality. TIA
Honestly, can someone give me an example of someone sympathetic to the R party (not even necessarily someone who has committed treason) testifying to Congress and the R congressmen completely siding with the witness and intervening on his behalf like the Ds are doing.
Not saying it hasn't happened, but wondering if it has. Completely embarrassing for all involved.
Not saying it hasn't happened, but wondering if it has. Completely embarrassing for all involved.
It's not a coincidence that everything Reps had Strzok on the ropes the Dems acted like unsophisticated heathens and constantly interrupted purposely obstructing the line of questioning.
He must be a Russian agent providing cover for Trump who's supposedly tearing Nato down. Beyond me how you idiots don't realize that having other countries spend more only makes Nato that much stronger.
Plus for those outraged that Trump suggested everyone go to 4%. Have you never negotiated before? What's the best way to get to 2%? You start high at 4% and work your way down to meet them in the middle at 2%. You never make your opening bid your bottom dollar. Amateurs.
Where do you get that? I see 49 with 8 toss ups. I'm thinking more like 55.
Would be great for the next 2 years.
Last edited:
Those dip sh!ts don't get the message without loud & crass. They knew O was just giving lip service - which was true as nothing happened.News flash from the, "Holy shit, what have we here, Batman" department.
That's not even the same thing we're talking about. Macron is denying they agreed to individually go to 4% which is double their previous individual targets of 2%.
We're talking about increased total defense spending doubling since 2014 because countries are starting to pay more. No one ever said anything about individual countries going to 4%. Try again.
Last edited:
I'd take 55 for sure. The race that I'm really going to be watching is Munchin in WV. He's in a bad spot right now and this Supreme Court vote of his could make or break his campaign.
Similar threads
