All of these Democrats comparing Border Patrol and ICE agents to Nazis and screaming for their jobs be abolished just because they're serving their country and upholding our laws. Wonder if they realize that half of these agents are Hispanic?
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
Sharyl is one of the best in the business. Wish I had the TV channel she comes on. I hope Fox hires her one day so I can actually watch her show.
But those Hispanics are like the Jews who worked for the Nazis.....
They no longer have any excuses, either. Evidence shows it was politically motivated.
“The evidence in this case establishes beyond a reasonable doubt that the suspect, fueled by rage against Republican legislators, decided to commit an act of terrorism as that term is defined by the Code of Virginia. See Va. Code §18.46.4,” Bryan L. Porter wrote in the report.
![[laughing]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/laugh.r191677.gif "Laughing [laughing]")
How long before Democrats and liberals totally ignore that he was a liberal Democrat and exploit as an act of terrorism by a straight, white male?
It actually has to be acknowledged by the media first
I watched this this morning. Epic beat down by Candace. Shes definitely a star in the making.
You know how I know that poll he linked is bullshit?
Because depending on how long "currently living" is, I would vote B or C.
There are others, even some who frequent this thread, who would vote A, B, or C.
That's not good polling.
Because depending on how long "currently living" is, I would vote B or C.
There are others, even some who frequent this thread, who would vote A, B, or C.
That's not good polling.
I wish Candace would break that stupid white girl's face. What a stupid white b****
Run over the protesters. Run.Them.Over
You know, I’d forgot about too. Shame on me I guess.
Unreal considering had he been successful he would have murdered 5% of Congress in what wouldve been the largest governmental crisis in the history of our country.
BUT STEVE CAPRICE HAS DIFFERNET VIEWS THAN ME HES A FASHIONIST KILL HIM
lol, imagine the left wing media having to justify a left wing psycho murdering 5% of Congress. Wowsers
'Without a doubt the images, and the reality, from 2014, just like 2018, are not pretty,” said Johnson. “We expanded it, I freely admit it was controversial, we believed it was necessary at the time, I still believe it is necessary to remain a certain capability for families.”
Johnson also addressed another phrase that has come up many times in the last week, saying directly that “we can’t have catch and release”.
Johnson also addressed another phrase that has come up many times in the last week, saying directly that “we can’t have catch and release”.
since 2002 it has varied from 60-85% showing up to court. that bullshit about 90% not showing up is made up. All the numbers are on the government website.
everything listed there is in the Republican bill that Trump told them on Friday to not bother with. Becasue he doesn't want it fixed, then he has nothing to scream about at his rallies.
Democrats won't sign anything that needs to be fixed.
More lying on your part. When your fingers move on a keyboard it's just a non verbal way for you to lie.
Because Democrats in the Senate have already openly made it clear that they will never vote for it. What's the point of wasting everyone's time? Do I need to remind you exactly what Schumer said?
Amendment XIV
Section 2.
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several states according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each state, excluding Indians not taxed.
This is for getting the house representation but still relevant to the discussion.
Last edited:
You are the most delusional person I've ever come across. This is exactly what the Democrats are doing, not Trump. His tweet was a direct result of Schumer's comments.
Schumer is purposely rejecting any bill because he doesn't want it fixed, would rather scream about it to you troglodytes and wants to keep the focus on Trump. Russia collusion is dead. This is their new political fearmongering issue.
Last edited:
That doesn't mean that can't pose a question asking if they're illegally or not. They're still getting counted.
Yep. Just pointing out that representation is for persons counted not just citizens.
So, does that mean you are for foreign nationals effecting our elections? Illegals or Russians?
But, if they pose a question asking if illegal or not, they can use those numbers to base representation. The 14th Amendment addresses aspects of citizenship and the rights of citizens. Section 2 is about voting rights. Illegals have zero voting rights. People who cannot vote in our elections shouldn't be allowed to distort congressional representation.
So the first question that should be asked on immigration is this.
Do liberals actually believe the talking points, or do they fully understand they are full of shit but understand the basic math that says these people will be great voters?
Do liberals actually believe the talking points, or do they fully understand they are full of shit but understand the basic math that says these people will be great voters?
Can someone explain these to me? Why do republicans think Mother Jones, Vox, and the Huff Post are less biased than NBC, MSNBC, and CNN?
Section 2 states in the first sentence
"Representatives shall be apportioned among the several states according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons..."
I assumed it is talking about the House's representation, no?
Read the rest. Of course, in the present it's 18 and male/female, but the point still remains. Yes, they're all supposed to be counted, but those counted and not eligible to vote are not to be included in deciding representation. The basis of representation is reduced to the proportion of eligible voters.
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several states according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each state, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the executive and judicial officers of a state, or the members of the legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such state, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such state.
This should be pushed over and over.
This is real foreign intervention in our elections.
Similar threads
