Honestly, I’d say a lot. A lot of people in California are against what their leadership does outside of major cities not named San Diego.
It’s clear to see this has become an issue of the will of the people (legal citizens) vs what the people in power want. And if the people in power are Uber liberals, then they’ll piss all over what any legal citizen wants. Blue cities and states are trying to pass laws that will ensure democratic victory forever... what people want or vote for be damned.
Let's see what happened.
California voted for Reagan, Reagan and Bush for three straight presidential elections. That was just 30-40 years ago.
What changed?
I'll tell you. In 1980, Latinos were about 10 percent of California's population. Now they're over 40 percent. They're the majority in California.
In 1970, the 2.4 million Latinos in California accounted for 12% of the population, while the 15.5 million whites in the state made up more than three-quarters of residents, according to state figures. By 1990, the Latino population jumped to 7.7 million, or about 25% of the state's population. The nation's Latino population has grown 57% since 2000, when Latinos numbered 35.3 million. Latinos accounted for most of the nation's growth — 56% — from 2000 to 2010.
So maybe you can understand why Democrats are 100 percent in on the anti-white stuff and wanting open borders.
That combined with Prop 187 where they got super offended by wanting legal immigration.
July 20, 2016 3:13PM
Proposition 187 Turned California Blue
By
Alex Nowrasteh
Share
California politics began to shift in the 1990s to such a degree that the state turned into a Democratic stronghold by the early 2000s. There are two main accounts of why that happened. The first is that Hispanics are naturally Democrats so as their numbers increased they naturally turned the state blue (
Gimpel 2010 makes this point for presidential election outcomes by county) while an increasingly liberal white electorate also helped. The other theory is that Republican support for anti-immigrant ballot initiatives and candidates ruined the GOP brand in the eyes of immigrants, their children, and whites who were turned off by the nativist appeals – driving all of them into the arms of the Democrats who were pro-immigration. More evidence supports the second theory than the first.
California Partisan Background
California was never a Republican or conservative stronghold.
Democrats controlled the legislature since 1959 with brief exceptions during 1969 to 1971 and from 1994 to 1996. Democratic governors were also elected in 1958, 1962, 1974, and 1978. On the policy front, California has been known for
high progressive income taxes, high
welfare benefit levels even after adjusting for the cost of living, and
onerous building restrictions. California’s only claim to being a Republican state was that it voted for the Republican candidate in every post-World War II Presidential election prior to 1992 except for 1948 and 1964. The two presidents from California have both been Republicans – Nixon and Reagan.
Political changes in California occurred both in its elections for national positions and on the state level. This post will examine how the demographic changes, Proposition 187, other propositions that were viewed as anti-immigrant, and Republican Governor Pete Wilson’s embrace of nativism are mostly responsible for shifting the Golden State’s politics.
Proposition 187 and Pete Wilson
Known as the “Save Our State” initiative, Proposition 187 would have denied all public services to illegal immigrants and forced all state employees to immediately report illegal immigrants to the Immigration and Naturalization Service for deportation. It appeared on the ballot in 1994 when California Republican governor Pete Wilson was running a very hard fought campaign for reelection. Wilson’s campaign embraced Proposition 187, the Republican Party threw its financial support behind it and used other
nativist talking points in order to win the election.
Prior to the vote, many Republican supporters of Proposition 187 admitted that its passage would not affect social service spending in California, mostly because unauthorized immigrants were already ineligible for welfare, and the rest of the package would likely be struck down by the courts. Republicans Jack Kemp and Bill Bennett even
opposed Proposition 187. Their opposition was summed up by William F. Buckley Jr. thusly:
“The Kemp-Bennet position says: Look, there shouldn’t be illegal immigrants in California, but it is the business of the Federal Government to keep them away.
To pass such a measure as 187 situates the GOP with a strain of xenophobia which will very quickly (California will be more than 50 percent Asian/Hispanic at the turn of the century whatever happens to illegals) evolve into anti-GOP resentments by the majority of Californians. That could lead to such electoral catastrophes as pursued many GOP candidates who were slow in boarding the civil-rights crusade.” [Emphasis added]
Bennett and Kemp were right.