I haven't mentioned religion in this thread, but I think you make a valid point. And I'd say religion and sexuality are treated similarly.
Like I exhausted the topic about whether it's a choice. And I never get an answer.
If it is a choice, and if you firmly believe that. At what point did you choose to be straight?
There are millions of species that engage in gay sex. It is overwhelming the comparison. Then someone always throws "Well, the red eared deer meets it's mate for life" Shut up. Just shut up.
There are millions of species that engage in gay sex. It is overwhelming the comparison.
Sure, if you can get the monkey's consent.Man is not the same as the other species IMO.
But let's assume we are, can we marry monkeys? Our DNA is so close.... DWS.
Yes, Levi's 501 for men and levi's 505 for women.Any word on if researchers have found the straight gene yet?
Any word on if researchers have found the straight gene yet?
I love when people point to animals and say they interact in gay sex so that proves it is a natural thing. Dogs eat shit...does that mean its natural and everyone should do it? Animals also fight, sometimes to the death to mate? Drink urine?
I don't care either way on who gets married, but I hate people comparing animal behavior to justify whay people should be allowed to do it.
I'll assume your non-answer means no.It's probably the one that relates to this:
I'll assume your non-answer means no.
So you answer the question with a cute drawing and an insult. Brilliant!Ass-ume all you want...
I just tried to keep it simple for you. In other words, you wouldn't be here to ask your question... without whatever would be considered the "straight" gene keeping humans on the planet for all these years.
Maybe you are, somehow, the product of 2 dudes going at it?
Man is not the same as the other species IMO.
But let's assume we are, can we marry monkeys? Our DNA is so close.... DWS.
So you answer the question with a cute drawing and an insult. Brilliant!
I know religious people hate science"
Not at all. I hate when at attempt is made to use 'science' to 'prove' there is no God. That everything must have happened and evolved on it's own. Of course nobody can or has repeatedly tested or observed these things anyway. They are theories. 'Settled science'. The commonalities you point to above, seem to point to a common creator IMO, rather than a common ancestor.
I submit to you that the brain you are using to think, reason, and participate in this thread could not have happened without a God.
But of course, this is a political thread, which took a sidebar into the politics of gay marriage, which then took a sidebar into, 'why can't we marry this or that? What's the difference?'
But I digress.
Someone else stated there is no gay gene, so I think it's fair to ask if they have identified the straight gene yet. If you don't know the answer then you shouldn't have volunteered one. I might know I'd get a response from the shallow end of the pool.That's all a disingenuous question deserves.
Please, hold your breath. I will help you if you want.That's why I'll leave it that. I disagree 100% that there is proof of a creator. I agree 100% with evolution and theories like Transpermia and Panspermia. Until the religious can come up with a better attempt to prove a claim that they originally came up with, I'll wait, but 'm not holding my breath.
Please, hold your breath. I will help you if you want.
Someone else stated there is no gay gene, so I think it's fair to ask if they have identified the straight gene yet. If you don't know the answer then you shouldn't have volunteered one. I might know I'd get a response from the shallow end of the pool.
Well it's good to know if you work for the Federal government (other than the royalty) the Chinese now have every bit of your personal information.
A gay/bi man can get a woman pregnant just like a straight man can, so you're FOS on the first one.I merely suggested the obvious connection between a "straight" gene and procreation. There sure seems like there's a whole lot of engineering with what parts do what, where they fit, and what may come of that union. Don't blame me just because you can't grasp the basics. If you know of a way that same-sex interactions can spread the genetic code and further evolution... let's hear your answers!
BTW, sometimes, there are Hot Moms at the shallow end, watching over the kiddies... not that you'd be interested. It seems you don't even want to contribute at all... just hanging around in the shower room with the guys that like to trade DNA.
A gay/bi man can get a woman pregnant just like a straight man can, so you're FOS on the first one.
And as for the second, have you considered your homophobic attitude is masking latent homosexuality?
Until the religious can come up with a better attempt to prove a claim that they originally came up with, I'll wait, but 'm not holding my breath.
Hold on a second. Why don't you just admit you like men on a subconscious level? Your previous words make it appear likely, and your screen name seems to confirm it, as it certainly sounds feminine - Dezy sure comes across like a girls name to me.....when you chose it you surely had a subliminal message in mind.
Listen, when you watch porn do you focus on the guy, and does that bother you - that is, if you even check out straight porn? Your apparent love of theater and your choice of a Blue Man Group member as you avatar is curious as well - no shortage of rumors about those New York based Off-Broadway rooted performers sexuality. Do they hide behind their paint the way you hide behind your Homophobic words?
Oh my god. I didn't think you belonged in that camp.I am not a Bible thumper, but for those that firmly believe that humans evolved from apes, then why are there still apes? Why didn't all apes develop into humans.
I am not a Bible thumper, but for those that firmly believe that humans evolved from apes, then why are there still apes? Why didn't all apes develop into humans. It is also a stretch for me to think that a God created everything on earth. I have my own beliefs, but will leave that for now.
Man never evolved from ape. That's not how the split happened. You can't evolve from an ape to a man. That is impossible. There was some new research that found once evolution causes changes it can't be reversed. So think about it this way KyFanin. There was a common ancestor. Something stressed the enviro to change that ancestor. Because of that stress to the enviro that common ancestor evolved into 3 different species. Apes, Monkeys, and humans. 3 different species from a common original species. None are the same.
Maybe god invented this all, maybe he didn't. My best answer is I don't know. Science isn't out to "get" Christians. It's out to explain the whats, whys, hows, and whens of the world. If Christians don't like that, tough shit. It's going to happen anyway. No stopping research.
Willy, I don't understand why in the hell this isn't being debated more too. We've got legislation thats going to give the president more power, can't be ammended, or debated, only needs 50% approval instead of 2/3 like treaties are required to have, and it's apparently in a top secret room in the capital where only certain people can view it. Yea, there's nothing shady about this whole deal.
We know evolution happens, and science can prove many examples.
Et tu, Brute?My biggest problems with evolution is:
1) It really isnt an answer at all, despite what we're taught. Its still just a guess/theory. There are tons of holes that noone can explain, and they get glossed over in the rush to declare a theory a law.
2) Its often used as an origin explanation, which is also wrong. Ok lets assume the ridiculous "primordial ooze" theory is correct. Then were did the primordial ooze come from?
In the rush to declare evolution as the end all explanation, people ignore these problems with the theory. We know evolution happens, and science can prove many examples. But with humans and our origins, there's just too much we dont know. Why is science, in general, afraid to admit that?