Rarely does this forum let me down so much. It's Jeb! or GTFO.
![Laughing [laughing] [laughing]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/laugh.r191677.gif)
Thank you for correctly spelling his name.
Rarely does this forum let me down so much. It's Jeb! or GTFO.
I am just glad to not live in a contested state so I don't have to work up the will to put shoes on to go vote.Made up up my mind. I'm sticking with Gary Johnson. He's better than Clinton or Rubio by a wild mile and it ain't even close. Just a shame that there will be a lot of us that will vote for him but it won't be enough because of the large pool of moronic Americans who will vote Dem or Repub.
I will sit comfortably knowing I made the best decision and that other stupid people I have to live with in this country is the cause of our demise.
Just want to give a shout out to my fellow Americans for ruining this country by voting Clinton or Rubio.
I am just glad to not live in a contested state so I don't have to work up the will to put shoes on to go vote.
Hey did you catch the 60 mins undercover on Sunday about NYC attorneys and moving money to the US from around the world?Rarely does this forum let me down so much. It's Jeb! or GTFO.
He is not up for re-election and his term is almost over so he can now start proving what many already knew about him.Obama at a Mosque defending the religion of peace today.
From 538, Rubio's odds of winning the nomination according to a bookmaker went from 30% to 55% after Iowa......
"Marco Rubio finished in third in Iowa — a “strong third” in which he outperformed his polls, but third nevertheless. And yet, his chances of winning the Republican nomination nearly doubled according to the bookmaker Betfair, from about 30 percent before the Iowa caucuses to 55 percent now.1 Meanwhile, Donald Trump, who finished ahead of Rubio although behind Ted Cruz, saw his chances halved from 50 percent to 25 percent."
He is not up for re-election and his term is almost over so he can now start proving what many already knew about him.
So, I personally find Cruz irritating in his delivery and just a little creepy, and as I've said, I think he has no chance in a general. And after waffling a while on the "is he or is he not", I eventually came down on the side of, yeah, he must be a horse's ass, because literally everyone says it. But I just read a piece from a journo in Texas that's known Cruz for several years, and she paints him in a not too bad way.
Good piece, worth a read: http://www.texasmonthly.com/politics/the-top-10-things-you-need-to-know-about-ted-cruz/
The outline of sorts:
1) Ted Cruz is not a fire-breathing extremist.
2) Cruz is also not a wild-eyed maniac.
3) He has nerves of steel.
4) Cruz is smarter than us.
5) He may even be too smart for his own good.
6) Cruz is very serious about strategy.
7) Cruz is meticulous with his words.
8) Cruz is a mainstream conservative from the Texas Republican establishment.
9) Cruz is really into the Constitution.
10) Cruz is in it to win.
I'm not sure Obama has an accurate understanding of Islam, quite honestly. He seems to be in denial.
I'm starting to get the idea you don't care for Cruz? I don't want to jump to any conclusions.Wow, this sounds like a great fella. It's not Ted Cruz, but genuinely a candidate worth considering.
If the article didn't make you laugh with "nerves of steel" then the part about Cruz being 'meticulous with his words' will make you dismiss it completely. The rest is obviously debatable, if not farcical, in an odd attempt to canonize Cruz.
What the article depicts is not the same guy that threw the CDC under the bus repeatedly during his fear mongering of the Ebola outbreak and became a laughing stock of the resulting overblown paranoia. It's not the same fella who stated 'We need 100 senators like Jesse Helms', whom we all know fervently supported segregation and opposed any public funding for AIDS research. What she describes is not the same candidate who declared directly at a 3 year old that the world is on fire. This is not the same guy who apologized for trying to sh*t on 'New York Values' or had to backtrack from the statement of that he wants to carpet bomb the areas controlled by ISIS to see if sand can glow. She is writing about someone other than the Ted Cruz who publicly apologized to Nigerians for comparing Obamacare to email scams.
Meticulous with his words? Nerves of Steel?
He's Santorum Mark II
I'm starting to get the idea you don't care for Cruz? I don't want to jump to any conclusions.
Or perhaps you have a very skewed view and understanding of Islam?I'm not sure Obama has an accurate understanding of Islam, quite honestly. He seems to be in denial.
I tried to find out a little about her - my standing presumption, and I know you fully endorse this view, is that a magazine writer is probably conventionally liberal unless and until proven otherwise. But who knows, perhaps she's a card carrying conservative. Like i have said, if just about everyone says you're a putz, chances are you're a putz. But.....this is politics, and it's not inconceivable to me that I'm simply accepting what everyone seems to be selling about Cruz, and maybe that's all coming from a concerted effort to portray him as an ass. Maybe in Washington DC people hate him. But maybe someone who actually knows him has a differing perspective.
or maybe not....
Probably because he doesn't want to give Islamists anymore bulletin board material than they already have. You know, bulletin board material like quoting Bible verses before invading Muslim countries.Other than votes, and world peace, why does Barry go so hard for Muslims? PR wise. For instance, it's not a news story whenever he does his Christian religious stuff, or I don't see the news covering him grieving with the family of a fallen soldier at church, or whatever. Is this just media marketing because that shit obviously won't draw as many eyeballs, or does Ohama just make it a political priority to showcase his views on Islam?..again, just for world peace and all that politcal jazz.
You have to figure a lot of people would think one mosque visit in 8 years is going hard for muslims.Other than votes, and world peace, why does Barry go so hard for Muslims? PR wise. For instance, it's not a news story whenever he does his Christian religious stuff, or I don't see the news covering him grieving with the family of a fallen soldier at church, or whatever. Is this just media marketing because that shit obviously won't draw as many eyeballs, or does Ohama just make it a political priority to showcase his views on Islam?..again, just for world peace and all that politcal jazz.
Maybe when he's visiting them he can ask them to stop killing innocent people.You have to figure a lot of people would think one mosque visit in 8 years is going hard for muslims.
Maybe when he's visiting them he can ask them to stop killing innocent people.
You are just making things up to try, horribly, to make some point. If you want to discuss Bush's specific EOs post about them. But the fact you only pop in to regurgitate an msnbc talking point about EOs that is just false shows the last bold part is not true. The fact is he has used EOs on larger issues and into grayer areas than other presidents, and sadly set worse precedents of behavior.
The bigger issue is that he refuses to ever truly negotiate other than bullying from the pulpit to demonize the GOP and when they refuse to be intimidated he reverts to the pen. It is lazy and petulant. Say what you want about the many Bush mistakes but they all pretty much had significant Dem support.
Thank you. That's what I was looking for.Maybe when he's visiting them he can ask them to stop killing innocent people.
Or perhaps you have a very skewed view and understanding of Islam?
There are 1.6 billion Muslims in the world...how many are committing terrorist acts?
There are about 3 million Muslims in the US. How many have been responsible for terrorist acts?
I guess you fit the general stereotype that most people have about people from the state of Kentucky...poorly educated, obese, less than a full set of teeth, low on the socio-economic scale, inbred...![]()
You have to figure a lot of people would think one mosque visit (by Obama) in 8 years is going hard for muslims.
Maybe when he's visiting them he can ask them to stop killing innocent people.
I'll add to this:
Abortion at its root is simply murder. Calling it anything else is just an exercise in semantics.
Whew....no I used those two examples, the contrast between them, to illustrate that quantity is irrelevant. Don't know why you are struggling so much with that or why those of the current potus are more conversation worthy than ones from 10+ years ago.If you want to compare EO's by two opposing POTUS you should use those that are significant to history.
BO - you use the gun control regulation.
W - you quoted protecting some fish.
The EO are listed in my post with links unlike any documentation you fail to do.
This isn't some crap MSNBC opinionated point, it's a point of our government eroding the rights of citizens by Presidential EO's to bypass Congress.
Are you are so blinded by your support for one party that the fish is more important than your civil liberties and government transparency?
^ Would be the first one to call someone racist and shed tears but was super quick to pull this stereotype out and make it as anyone who criticizes Islam must be uneducated and obese.
You got any pictures of black guys committing crime in Chicago, St. Louis or Detroit saved?
You mention terrorist attacks and play the numbers. Why don't you bring up things like oh, I don't know rapes, female genital mutilation, honor killings, sexual slavery, executing gays, executing anyone who leaves the faith, oppression of women when it comes to not letting them drive, not giving any credence to them being raped, women consodered less than a man, hijab, a tax on non Muslims in Muslim majority countries?
You Libs are so GD delusional when it comes to Muslims. You think it's just a coincidence that this stuff happens. It's like you purposely put your heads in the sand.
Something tells me you wouldn't like living in a Muslim majority country but you keep advocating them coming here. You know because it's going so well for Europe. I mean, Sweden loves their rape stats and Germany loves paying for all of their welfare and zero assimilation.
Muslims play like they're nice and being targeted in a place where they're outnumbered and ask for tolerance. Then when Muslims start to grow in number and eventually become a majority, there is no tolerance and you yuppies will look around and say "Gah. What happened?"
Willy knows this shit more than any of you, by the way.
Or perhaps you have a very skewed view and understanding of Islam?
There are 1.6 billion Muslims in the world...how many are committing terrorist acts?
There are about 3 million Muslims in the US. How many have been responsible for terrorist acts?
I guess you fit the general stereotype that most people have about people from the state of Kentucky...poorly educated, obese, less than a full set of teeth, low on the socio-economic scale, inbred...![]()