Implying Marxist Hollywood would ever release a movie damaging their already trash reputationI can't wait for the movie about all this.
Someone shows their ass again.
![]()
I have zero faith in any government agency. They are all corrupted after 8 years of Obama.
I have zero faith in any government agency. They are all corrupted after 8 years of Obama.
About that... I saw the Tim Allen news about his anti-PC doc and that got me to thinking there could possibly be a coming split in hollywood.Implying Marxist Hollywood would ever release a movie damaging their already trash reputation
Amen.The onion may be the least fake source of news we have. At least they are openly satirical.
you're the most easily triggered person in this thread. It's bizarre how even slight criticism to anything even remotely close to you elicits a reaction like this. Just really weird, man. Calm down, it ain't that seriousThen don't ****ing read it.
you're the most easily triggered person in this thread. It's bizarre how even slight criticism to anything even remotely close to you elicits a reaction like this. Just really weird, man. Calm down, it ain't that serious
Talk about virtue signaling. Well, the irony is I can guaran-damn-tee you there will be even less schools or streets named after Comey.Lol, is this stupid f**k comparing talking about FBI corruption to McCarthyism? Get real. Comey is a shithole.
so comey is saying that trump cleansing the FBI is mcartheyism? The communists (which they are) in the FBI did this to themselves by getting sloppy and way too bold with their crimes.Talk about virtue signaling. Well, the irony is I can guaran-damn-tee you there will be even less schools or streets named after Comey.
Lol, is this stupid f**k comparing talking about FBI corruption to McCarthyism? Get real. Comey is a shithole.
I still have faith in the memo simply because of the ultra meltdown the dems, MSM and deep state are having over it. There's clearly some stuff in it that they do not want out.Well he ought to know what a weasel looks like. I don't have any hope in that memo. Will be watered down after multiple redactions and regardless what it says 90 percent of our media will report what the dems tell them to say. The Republicans who made such a big deal of it will say too much was redacted or something like that. And lowlifes like Comey will be protected like always. 50 years from now we will find out he and holder and company were as bad as we thought they were
"If it's necessary" What a jerk off.
I still have faith in the memo simply because of the ultra meltdown the dems, MSM and deep state are having over it. There's clearly some stuff in it that they do not want out.
I mean Pelosi and Schumer going after Nunes hard today tells me these people are terrified.
Apparently the non redacted memo is coming out tomorrow morning. Gonna be interesting.
Nice gig ending SS payments by June.It's tough to tell with mine - it went down a few hundred bucks but I stopped paying SS Tax in June and it picked back up again in January. Will be easier to compare later this year.
ETA I'm sure @Rex Kwon Do will love this one![]()
"Etienne Uzac". Interesting name. Etienne is French for Stephen. Is he a frog?Oooh.
"The resignations also come just two weeks after Newsweek’s New York City headquarters were raided for unclear reasons by the New York Police Department and district attorney’s office."
Nice gig ending SS payments by June.
If it's all made up, partisan b.s., then why are they so adamant about redacting names? Besides, releasing the names of public servants is not a threat to national security.
that's the kind of snide comment that makes it easy to hate them haha."If it's necessary" What a jerk off.
An hour ago, I was seeing multiple tweets saying Trump would back release of un-redacted memo by committee. Now I can't seem to find those tweets.
Read back a page. I posted an article about it. Senior Official told the press pool. No redactions from Trump. Being sent back to House Intel Committee for Friday morning release. After that, it's in their hands.An hour ago, I was seeing multiple tweets saying Trump would back release of un-redacted memo by committee. Now I can't seem to find those tweets.
Would not do any good because "sometimes they come back".I bet if I hit Stephen King with a van he wouldn't walk away. Well, maybe after the first hit, but the next ten or so would turn him to mush.
So, they can redact it after Trump suggested it be released unredacted?Read back a page. I posted an article about it. Senior Official told the press pool. No redactions from Trump. Being sent back to House Intel Committee for Friday morning release. After that, it's in their hands.
I have no clue what the House can do at that point. I'm sure if the majority agrees to redact it before release, then they'd have the authority to. I mean, after all, it's their memo. I seriously doubt Nunes would agree to that, though.So, they can redact it after Trump suggested it be released unredacted?