That's a nice phrase on the side of a building. I wonder what phrases are carved in the gravestones of the people murdered with the guns he supplied to Mexican drug cartels.
If Trump Jr. meeting with a no name Russian lawyer, offering zero money, for dirt on a political opponent, dirt that didn't even exist or change hands, is selling books worthy "treasonous"...
then paying a washed up British spy hundreds of thousands of dollars, who then turned around and paid the Kremlin hundreds of thousands of dollars for lies and slander must be firing squad.
And that doesn't even get into how those lies and slander were used, and what they were used for.
I thought US was one of the last primary countries that abolished slavery. UK did much earlier.
Has Bannon completely lost it at this point? He's always been a numbskull but he appears to be getting worse at an accelerated rate.
Was James posting more fake news?Not a Bannon guy. But story already shown to be a joke and debunked.
Not a Bannon guy. But story already shown to be a joke and debunked.
Slavery was introduced as an institution in North America by Britain and in Spanish Florida by Spain and Portugal.
From the signing of the Declaration of Independence in 1776 to the end of the Civil War in 1865 (the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863 didn't put an immediate end to slavery) the institution of slavery lasted "only" 89 years. This is a very short time period historically - especially compared to Britain, Portugal, Spain and especially many centuries of slavery practiced by Muslim North Africa.
White folks fought a bitter civil war amongst themselves with 600,000 deaths to finally settle the issue. (Black lives matter!)
So, slavery came and went pretty quickly in the United States (relatively speaking) and the seeds to abolish it existed even before the US became an independent nation - almost exclusively from the "religious right".
The worst slavers in the west were the Spanish peoples (including Portugal) and the Spanish peoples held on to the institution of slavery to the bitter end in Cuba, Puerto Rico and South America - holding on until decades after the end of the American Civil War.
Slavery was introduced as an institution in North America by Britain and in Spanish Florida by Spain and Portugal.
From the signing of the Declaration of Independence in 1776 to the end of the Civil War in 1865 (the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863 didn't put an immediate end to slavery) the institution of slavery lasted "only" 89 years. This is a very short time period historically - especially compared to Britain, Portugal, Spain and especially many centuries of slavery practiced by Muslim North Africa.
White folks fought a bitter civil war amongst themselves with 600,000 deaths to finally settle the issue. (Black lives matter!)
So, slavery came and went pretty quickly in the United States (relatively speaking) and the seeds to abolish it existed even before the US became an independent nation - almost exclusively from the "religious right".
The worst slavers in the west were the Spanish peoples (including Portugal) and the Spanish peoples held on to the institution of slavery to the bitter end in Cuba, Puerto Rico and South America - holding on until decades after the end of the American Civil War.
No one is trying to down play it. Actual facts were being brought to the forefront after incorrect statements were being made. It is only after the facts come out that posters try to dismiss the facts with subjective rhetoric.Not sure why people are trying to downplay (or justify) slavery. Never understood it.
Slavery may have "only" *eye roll* lasted a "relatively" short time compared to other nations, but it is not like America was all about equality and freedom post-slavery. Jim Crow anyone? Not to mention, slavery didn't truly end in 1865. In the South, many still used loopholes, including forced labor, that kept thousands upon thousands of blacks in the same or worse position.
Also, white folks weren't the only ones to fight in the Civil War. That's just ignorant. Nearly 180,000 blacks served in the union army without roughly 40,000 dying.
No not at all. The point was simply to put a perspective on what was being wrongly argued about the US and our nations history about slavery. No one is saying what we did was right. Slavery in any form is wrong.That's kind of a silly argument based solely on the US not existing as early as other countries. It's not like they had any more morals than other countries, which is what was implied.
Whites were not the only ones to own slaves either. Slavery is wrong, but anyone that wants to hate on white people and turn their heads at the black people that sold and owned slaves also are two faced pricks.Not sure why people are trying to downplay (or justify) slavery. Never understood it.
Slavery may have "only" *eye roll* lasted a "relatively" short time compared to other nations, but it is not like America was all about equality and freedom post-slavery. Jim Crow anyone? Not to mention, slavery didn't truly end in 1865. In the South, many still used loopholes, including forced labor, that kept thousands upon thousands of blacks in the same or worse position.
Also, white folks weren't the only ones to fight in the Civil War. That's just ignorant. Nearly 180,000 blacks served in the union army without roughly 40,000 dying.
I bet that Transgender Theory class is a laugh a minute.
He was ok 10-12 years ago.
Not sure who actually wrote it, but it was put out by the WH as an official Trump statement.Who actually wrote that statement?
Watch to see how many liberals now fall in love with Bannon when he was the devil a few months back.
That's kind of a silly argument based solely on the US not existing as early as other countries. It's not like they had any more morals than other countries, which is what was implied.