POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
We need to talk about important things like how Bill Clinton is a rapist.
Nuke us, Kim. Nuke us into oblivion.HahahA
Islam does NOT rule the UK, though. And it probably never will. Those that who rule are the elitists, and you CAN criticize them, though it's largely ineffectual to do so, unless it is put to the vote (Brexit).
I swear, between all the great posts from brother @Willy4UK , @screwduke1 , @moe_schmoe and @WKBlu and many others; I've got enough material to start an award-winning website.
What say ye? Shall we conquer cyberspace from another angle?
What say ye? Shall we conquer cyberspace from another angle?
Remember a few years back, when we had a lot of churches that were attended by Blacks that were burned in the South. The media was eating this up with all of their hate crime talk. And now this.It's like this never happened. Is there any wonder why people has so little respect for the media
What a psycho! These people are totally unhinged and completely clueless as to the brainwashing the left has subjected them to. A serious cleansing of this country is needed.
I don't know if the internet could handle such awesomeness.
Why does the media/left have a mission to protect Islam at all costs? I get the dems need minority votes and that's the reason behind all the racial tactics... But why Islam? It's the one religion that calls for killing if you don't believe what they believe.
Islam is the exact opposite of tolerance. They kill gays for being gay. They kill women for wearing make up. They behead people for not converting to their religion... in fact they're a lot like nazis... like the far left...
It's starting to make sense on some level.
"ISLAMS CANT HEOP IT THEY WAS BORNED THAT WAY!!!"
Can't wait for the MSM to connect Richard Spencer, and the other mostly idiots in Charlottesville to Trump and Trump supporters, even though most Trump supporters (at least most of the ones I talk to) do not like those people.
I find people like Spencer to be mostly attention whores. Have no clue how he has any kind of following. He and his followers want to sabotage the Trump movement, IMO.
I find people like Spencer to be mostly attention whores. Have no clue how he has any kind of following. He and his followers want to sabotage the Trump movement, IMO.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ they got stupid money, and they may or may not be the fastest growing religion? Idk if I made that up, but the growing popularity in America is certainly do to $$$$$. We want their money, we want their people to come here and take our loans, etc. White people ain't making babies and they're staying in college for decades, living with parents, etc, essentially NOT living the American dream.
Rubic, wtf is this?
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/08/...typ=cur&referer=https://t.co/NBa1dODcHY?amp=1
The University of Miami received a nervous call from the Trump administration: American diplomats in Havana were getting sick with headaches, dizziness and hearing loss. Washington needed answers.
At least six patients were flown from Cuba to the university’s hospital this year to determine the cause of a medical mystery that was dogging several people who worked at the American Embassy in Havana. The illnesses appeared to be caused by some kind of sonic wave machine, and the symptoms worsened with prolonged exposure, said a person who was briefed on the situation but was not authorized to comment.
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/08/...typ=cur&referer=https://t.co/NBa1dODcHY?amp=1
The University of Miami received a nervous call from the Trump administration: American diplomats in Havana were getting sick with headaches, dizziness and hearing loss. Washington needed answers.
At least six patients were flown from Cuba to the university’s hospital this year to determine the cause of a medical mystery that was dogging several people who worked at the American Embassy in Havana. The illnesses appeared to be caused by some kind of sonic wave machine, and the symptoms worsened with prolonged exposure, said a person who was briefed on the situation but was not authorized to comment.
I heard about this.
If this is true, it should be the top story and dominate the news. But it won't. Most won't even hear about it.
Yep came out last week. US and canadian diplomats suffered permanent hearing loss as a result of some sonic weapon.
Of course it was pushed to the back of the news. Instead msm spends time worrying about how many scoops of ice cream trump gets.
On Friday, Secretary of State Rex W. Tillerson said the illnesses were a result of “health attacks,” adding, “We’ve not been able to determine who’s to blame.”
Just say Youtube and call it a day, Rex.
Really is crazy to think American diplomats were murdered by terrorists in a covert gun running operation gone awry, and asking questions about that is now mocked by the left.
‘Nation,’ mag of the far left, finds Russia hack nonsensical
You know it’s time to pack it up and move on from a Democratic-driven political hit when even the left-of-left liberal-leaning magazine, The Nation, starts to say, hey, guys, there are no facts here.
In other words: This whole Russia-hacked-the-election-with-President-Donald-Trump’s-help mantra may finally be crumbling.
Nation writer Patrick Lawrence took a look at all of the facts of the past year surrounding the supposed Russian government hack of the Democratic National Committee and concluded, rather embarrassingly for the left, that there really aren’t so many facts after all. His story title says it all: “A New Report Raises Big Questions About Last Year’s DNC Hack.”
What about all those DNC emails that painted Hillary Clinton and her staff in a poor light, and that came just at a critical campaign moment for the Democratic candidate? Weren’t they driven, as the left is fond of saying, by the colluding hands of Russia and Trump’s campaign?
Once again, even the Nation seems to be saying — fact free. The email leaks seem due to an inside leaker, not outside hacker.
Lawrence cites research from the group Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity to find: “All those interviewed came in between 90 percent and 100 percent certain that the forensics [of the hack from Russia] prove out. … ‘The laws of physics don’t lie,’ [VIPS’] Ray McGovern volunteered at one point. … When I asked [VIPS’] Edward Loomis, a 90 percent man, about the 10 percent he held out, he replied, ‘I’ve looked at the word and it shows there was no Russian hack. But I didn’t do the work. That’s the 10 percent. I’m a scientist.’ “
And yet — the DNC won’t admit defeat.
“U.S. intelligence agencies have concluded the Russian government hacked the DNC in an attempt to interfere in the election,” a DNC spokesperson told Breitbart. “Any suggestion otherwise is false and is just another conspiracy theory like those pushed by Trump and his administration.”
Right. Except for one thing: Only three intelligence agencies, not 17, as initially believed, actually drew that conclusion in a report, the Intelligence Community Assessment.
The takeaway? America’s still waiting for the facts and evidence to show the left’s main argument — that Team Trump stole the election from Clinton with the help of the Russians. And when a committed player of the far left like The Nation starts to wonder on this — and show evidence to the contrary — maybe it’s time to move on from that message.
You know it’s time to pack it up and move on from a Democratic-driven political hit when even the left-of-left liberal-leaning magazine, The Nation, starts to say, hey, guys, there are no facts here.
In other words: This whole Russia-hacked-the-election-with-President-Donald-Trump’s-help mantra may finally be crumbling.
Nation writer Patrick Lawrence took a look at all of the facts of the past year surrounding the supposed Russian government hack of the Democratic National Committee and concluded, rather embarrassingly for the left, that there really aren’t so many facts after all. His story title says it all: “A New Report Raises Big Questions About Last Year’s DNC Hack.”
What about all those DNC emails that painted Hillary Clinton and her staff in a poor light, and that came just at a critical campaign moment for the Democratic candidate? Weren’t they driven, as the left is fond of saying, by the colluding hands of Russia and Trump’s campaign?
Once again, even the Nation seems to be saying — fact free. The email leaks seem due to an inside leaker, not outside hacker.
Lawrence cites research from the group Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity to find: “All those interviewed came in between 90 percent and 100 percent certain that the forensics [of the hack from Russia] prove out. … ‘The laws of physics don’t lie,’ [VIPS’] Ray McGovern volunteered at one point. … When I asked [VIPS’] Edward Loomis, a 90 percent man, about the 10 percent he held out, he replied, ‘I’ve looked at the word and it shows there was no Russian hack. But I didn’t do the work. That’s the 10 percent. I’m a scientist.’ “
And yet — the DNC won’t admit defeat.
“U.S. intelligence agencies have concluded the Russian government hacked the DNC in an attempt to interfere in the election,” a DNC spokesperson told Breitbart. “Any suggestion otherwise is false and is just another conspiracy theory like those pushed by Trump and his administration.”
Right. Except for one thing: Only three intelligence agencies, not 17, as initially believed, actually drew that conclusion in a report, the Intelligence Community Assessment.
The takeaway? America’s still waiting for the facts and evidence to show the left’s main argument — that Team Trump stole the election from Clinton with the help of the Russians. And when a committed player of the far left like The Nation starts to wonder on this — and show evidence to the contrary — maybe it’s time to move on from that message.
A New Report Raises Big Questions About Last Year’s DNC Hack
Former NSA experts say it wasn’t a hack at all, but a leak—an inside job by someone with access to the DNC’s system.
We come now to a moment of great gravity.
There has been a long effort to counter the official narrative we now call “Russiagate.” This effort has so far focused on the key events noted above, leaving numerous others still to be addressed. Until recently, researchers undertaking this work faced critical shortcomings, and these are to be explained. But they have achieved significant new momentum in the past several weeks, and what they have done now yields very consequential fruit. Forensic investigators, intelligence analysts, system designers, program architects, and computer scientists of long experience and strongly credentialed are now producing evidence disproving the official version of key events last year. Their work is intricate and continues at a kinetic pace as we speak. But its certain results so far are two, simply stated, and freighted with implications:
Former NSA experts say it wasn’t a hack at all, but a leak—an inside job by someone with access to the DNC’s system.
We come now to a moment of great gravity.
There has been a long effort to counter the official narrative we now call “Russiagate.” This effort has so far focused on the key events noted above, leaving numerous others still to be addressed. Until recently, researchers undertaking this work faced critical shortcomings, and these are to be explained. But they have achieved significant new momentum in the past several weeks, and what they have done now yields very consequential fruit. Forensic investigators, intelligence analysts, system designers, program architects, and computer scientists of long experience and strongly credentialed are now producing evidence disproving the official version of key events last year. Their work is intricate and continues at a kinetic pace as we speak. But its certain results so far are two, simply stated, and freighted with implications:
- There was no hack of the Democratic National Committee’s system on July 5 last year—not by the Russians, not by anyone else. Hard science now demonstrates it was a leak—a download executed locally with a memory key or a similarly portable data-storage device. In short, it was an inside job by someone with access to the DNC’s system. This casts serious doubt on the initial “hack,” as alleged, that led to the very consequential publication of a large store of documents on WikiLeaks last summer.
- Forensic investigations of documents made public two weeks prior to the July 5 leak by the person or entity known as Guccifer 2.0 show that they were fraudulent: Before Guccifer posted them they were adulterated by cutting and pasting them into a blank template that had Russian as its default language. Guccifer took responsibility on June 15 for an intrusion the DNC reported on June 14 and professed to be a WikiLeaks source—claims essential to the official narrative implicating Russia in what was soon cast as an extensive hacking operation. To put the point simply, forensic science now devastates this narrative.
The left is freaking out. If Trump freaks them out, I go to bed happy.
Trust Keith Ellison and Maxine.
Trust Keith Ellison and Maxine.
![[laughing]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/laugh.r191677.gif "Laughing [laughing]")
His one line could be used as the lead in to a new "300" type movie, titled "40". "When fascism came back, 40 people stood against hundreds."
That's a guy??
"When fascism came back, 40 people stood against hundreds."
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
+/~(NEW-UPDATED) Cash app money generator 2024 July
- Latest: nhjsdhabnviofd
-
-
