Hitler was essentially a tyrant communist pretending to be a socialist, who claimed capitalism was a cancer.
You're exactly right, most liberals have no idea how close they are to hitler ideology.
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
Hitler was essentially a tyrant communist pretending to be a socialist, who claimed capitalism was a cancer.
You're exactly right, most liberals have no idea how close they are to hitler ideology.
Now that's some serious spin. Everyone with half a brain is laughing at Trump taking it up the ass gladly from Putin. Even suggesting such an asinine idea shows how amateurish Trump is. This is not a reality show where you just make up stupid crap to spew on Twitter. Russia is the #1 purveyor of cyber attacks, been caught penetrating our infrastructure, and have engaged in spreading propaganda to weaken democracies throughout the Western world. But yeah Trump was warning Putin. Just listen to yourselves. You guys should just be done with it, stop pretending, and replace the red, white and blue with the Russian flag. Trump has already said over and over he doesn't really believe Russia is behind this because if he did then he would have to acknowledge that his team used Russia's hacking of the DNC and Clinton. You've called Obama a traitor for much less than this. Looks like Trump Jr has been caught with his hand in the cookie jar.
The truth is he needs Russia to help him again in 2020, that is if his voter suppression commission isn't successful. Which is why he refuses to attack Putin. But Trump was right. He could shoot someone in broad daylight on national tv and you guys wouldn't care.
Liberals and the majority of media who carry their flag claim that their views are based on 'facts'...yet the number of stories that discredit their world view are so numerous and yet they manage to miss all those stories. But if one muslim in toronto gives one white child a cookie...CNN, the washington post, New York Times, morning joe...none of them miss that photo, they show it a dozen times and wonder aloud about the awful racism of middle America
You serious? America was literally one of the last major countries to abolish slavery. Hell slavery was abolished in Russia in 1723.
Liberalism is a cancer and a brain disorder or mental illness.
I'm sorry, who sounds like Hitler? This is how he and his ilk talked about the Jews before they sent them to concentration camps.
So self-righteous, you and your savior the man baby king.
I thought it was just adoption talk.
http://www.cnbc.com/2017/07/09/dona...after-being-promised-info-on-clinton-nyt.html
http://www.cnbc.com/2017/07/09/dona...after-being-promised-info-on-clinton-nyt.html
Has anyone in history gone from inept pariah to virtuous hero like Comey in just a few month? Power of the media.
Ha! Not just the media. Takes a microwave society with short term memory too
Hahahaha. I swear, you should start a political parody site where you post this stuff. Youd be rich.
Hes made this same cycle 2 or 3 different times in about 12 months
I love all the Russia/Trump talk still coming from the far left. But never any mention of these issues:
http://www.weeklystandard.com/obama...ection-i-have-more-flexibility/article/634473
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html
We didn't seem too scared of Russia just a few short years ago.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/obama...ection-i-have-more-flexibility/article/634473
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html
We didn't seem too scared of Russia just a few short years ago.
So it's amateurish for Trump to simply discuss forming Cyber Security? And you say I'm the one spinning? Could've fooled me.
Who says he's making it up? You do realize Giuliani, actually his company, was tasked to form Cyber Security months ago.
No, listen to yourself. I never said he was warning Putin, only that he could have been. Again, his tweet was vague. It could have meant numerous things. Unlike you, I'm not a Russiaphobe and made no assumptions.
How so? Is it now wrong to do opposition research to use against hour opponents? The Democrats paid an ex British spy to collect dirt (make shit up) on Trump. Did they get caught eating a cookie?
Political witch hunt, pure and simple. It's about creating a perception of impropriety where no impropriety exists, then asserting the perception they have created is reality. None of it is real, CNN and MSM are chasing shadows and claiming substance. The one good thing coming out of this, however, is that their liberal bias and ulterior motives are laid bare, exposed for all to see.
Welp, looks like the leaked DNC emails were done locally. CNN's Russia narrative is blown the eff out.
Here's your next Barack Obama:
http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/fe...-running-muslim-governor-170314044707977.html
http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/fe...-running-muslim-governor-170314044707977.html
How the AP Stylebook censors 'pro-life' and other conservative words
A journalism stylebook is supposed to provide universal guidelines for writers when it comes to stylistic things like punctuation, capitalization and so on. This includes choosing certain words over others.
The original intent of word preference was to use words that are more neutral than others. But in recent years, that concept has changed.
More often than not, style writers have been more interested in censoring conservative words while promoting language that liberals tend to favor. That's been especially true of the AP Stylebook published by The Associated Press. It's unfortunate, because that's the guide most journalists rely upon.
Even when individual authors do not adhere to the bias of AP Style, it often doesn't matter. If they submit an article to a mainstream media outlet, they will likely see their words edited to conform. A pro-life author who submits a piece taking a position against abortion will see the words "pro-life" changed to "anti-abortion," because the AP Stylebook instructs, "Use anti-abortion instead of pro-life and pro-abortion rights instead of pro-abortion or pro-choice." It goes on, "Avoid abortionist," saying the term "connotes a person who performs clandestine abortions."
Words related to terrorism are sanitized in the AP Stylebook. Militant, lone wolves or attackers are to be used instead of terrorist or Islamist. "People struggling to enter Europe" is favored over "migrant" or "refugee." While it's true that many struggle to enter Europe, it is accurate to point out that they are, in fact, immigrants or refugees.
"Illegal immigrant" and "undocumented" aren't acceptable anymore either. "Illegals" and "alien" were already forbidden a few years ago. Although "illegal immigration" is still acceptable, it's not clear what words are supposed to replace the forbidden words. The word "amnesty" contains no reference to illegal immigrants, instead instructing, "See pardon, parole, probation."
A journalism stylebook is supposed to provide universal guidelines for writers when it comes to stylistic things like punctuation, capitalization and so on. This includes choosing certain words over others.
The original intent of word preference was to use words that are more neutral than others. But in recent years, that concept has changed.
More often than not, style writers have been more interested in censoring conservative words while promoting language that liberals tend to favor. That's been especially true of the AP Stylebook published by The Associated Press. It's unfortunate, because that's the guide most journalists rely upon.
Even when individual authors do not adhere to the bias of AP Style, it often doesn't matter. If they submit an article to a mainstream media outlet, they will likely see their words edited to conform. A pro-life author who submits a piece taking a position against abortion will see the words "pro-life" changed to "anti-abortion," because the AP Stylebook instructs, "Use anti-abortion instead of pro-life and pro-abortion rights instead of pro-abortion or pro-choice." It goes on, "Avoid abortionist," saying the term "connotes a person who performs clandestine abortions."
Words related to terrorism are sanitized in the AP Stylebook. Militant, lone wolves or attackers are to be used instead of terrorist or Islamist. "People struggling to enter Europe" is favored over "migrant" or "refugee." While it's true that many struggle to enter Europe, it is accurate to point out that they are, in fact, immigrants or refugees.
"Illegal immigrant" and "undocumented" aren't acceptable anymore either. "Illegals" and "alien" were already forbidden a few years ago. Although "illegal immigration" is still acceptable, it's not clear what words are supposed to replace the forbidden words. The word "amnesty" contains no reference to illegal immigrants, instead instructing, "See pardon, parole, probation."
Yeah a meme that is made for nothing more than a few laughs is more dangerous than anonymous sources, made up stories and blatant lies.
On second thought, I could see these memes triggering someone... triggering... trigger... guns! GUNS!!
That must be what it's like to be inside the mind of a far left liberal.
That must be what it's like to be inside the mind of a far left liberal.
Utter nonsense. There's a ton of examples of stupid PC bull crap in there especially when it comes to gender. You also can't say "mailman" because it's "sexist." You have to say "letter carrier."
Also, their change to anti-abortion is a perfect, PERFECT, illustration of their marketing tactics on their causes and how to paint their enemy.
Democrats aren't pro murder or pro abortion- they're called "pro choice."
Conservatives aren't pro life or anti murder- they're anti choice, anti abortion.
Conservatives who believe in freedom of religion and freedom to choose whether or not to participate in a private transaction are portrayed as "anti-LGBT" or "homophobic."
Damage to democracy, huh? But it's not damaging when media colludes with a political candidate and the DNC? When it colludes with them on how to cover events, on what questions to ask their opponents, when they allow a political candidate's camp to edit and approve articles, to hide truth and reality and push an agenda of lies and censor? That's not damaging to democracy?
I got into a huge argument on twitter with a professor I had in college. His entire timeline is nothing but anti-Trump and anti-Republican and anti-Fox News/Breit Bart. Not once has this guy ever bashed Democrats and he claimed just like Salon did, about how Trump's attempt to attack the credibility of the media is bad for democracy.
I brought up all of the things of why people do not trust them and what they were caught doing- staging scenes, leaking debate questions, feeding answers to focus groups, letting Clinton camp edit and approve articles, cutting off guests, colluding with DNC on campaign strategies and questions to ask Trump/Bush, etc. He said these are alt-right talking points that have grown tiresome.
This dickhead never bothered to read the WikiLeaks emails but went on and on about Russia. How can you go nuts over Russia and then not even know the contents of the emails of why it was bad? Anyways, I proceeded to show videos and the actual emails of what occurred. Then he sends me a DM of BS, "It's easier to attack the media as opposed to defend Trump, huh?" and then on and on about how it's deliberate strategic attack from the right wing media, which is bad for democracy.
Oh, and in case you're keeping score at home. Liberals bashing Fox News ("Faux News"), Info Wars and Breit Bart and anything non-left is totally okay and allowed. Pointing out corruption and collusion from the liberal media is "a threat to democracy."
There in lies part of the problem. The arrogance of being a "professor" exempts him from having to look at any other information. He thinks he is so smart that his opinion is fact.
Welp, guess that asshole won't learn. Dems keep blaming and hold no introspection of their flaws and keep losing.
What little sissies.
http://www.ebaumsworld.com/videos/cnn-caught-using-their-own-cameramen-as-fake-protester/85188452/
Came across this today. I'm sure I'm late to the party, but did anyone see this? CNN interviews their own cameraman passing him off as a random hot and accidentally reveals he's a cameraman! What trash they are.
Came across this today. I'm sure I'm late to the party, but did anyone see this? CNN interviews their own cameraman passing him off as a random hot and accidentally reveals he's a cameraman! What trash they are.
Losing more and more control of the victim/dependant culture they created.
Eating Their Own: California Democrats Facing Death Threats From Progressives For Shelving Single-Payer Bill
So, the Golden State had a great idea. To make it crystal clear that they’re a cesspool of progressivism, they’re going to try and adopt a single-payer health care system. It would cost $400 billion and the California state legislature had no mechanism to pay for it. The State Senate pushed it through, but it met a legislative death in the State Assembly. Even The Washington Post noted the system’s astronomical price tag, adding that the increases in taxation would be coupled with a decrease in benefits and access to care, which has to happen to keep costs down and ensure universal coverage. That isn’t a trade off the vast majority of Americans are willing to accept. Now, as the California’s first attempt at single payer dies, the backlash from the progressive Left against the state's Democrats has been brutal, with some receiving death threats:
Eating Their Own: California Democrats Facing Death Threats From Progressives For Shelving Single-Payer Bill
So, the Golden State had a great idea. To make it crystal clear that they’re a cesspool of progressivism, they’re going to try and adopt a single-payer health care system. It would cost $400 billion and the California state legislature had no mechanism to pay for it. The State Senate pushed it through, but it met a legislative death in the State Assembly. Even The Washington Post noted the system’s astronomical price tag, adding that the increases in taxation would be coupled with a decrease in benefits and access to care, which has to happen to keep costs down and ensure universal coverage. That isn’t a trade off the vast majority of Americans are willing to accept. Now, as the California’s first attempt at single payer dies, the backlash from the progressive Left against the state's Democrats has been brutal, with some receiving death threats:
California Democratic lawmakers are facing a brutal backlash from union activists and others on the left after shelving a universal health care bill – a debate that has grown so intense that lawmakers say they’ve faced death threats and other violent rhetoric.
Assembly Democrats publicly decried the “bullying tactics” in a written statement over the weekend, maintaining that lawmakers are committed to improving health care but need to have an “open discourse.”
“In recent days, we have become alarmed and disheartened by bullying tactics, threats of violence, and death threats by a few who disagree with the decision of Speaker Anthony Rendon to postpone the advancement of SB 562,” they said, referring to the scrapped single-payer health care bill. “While it is appropriate for persons of varying views to express concern, disapproval or disfavor about the delay, it is never acceptable to engage in those tactics.”
Assembly Democrats publicly decried the “bullying tactics” in a written statement over the weekend, maintaining that lawmakers are committed to improving health care but need to have an “open discourse.”
“In recent days, we have become alarmed and disheartened by bullying tactics, threats of violence, and death threats by a few who disagree with the decision of Speaker Anthony Rendon to postpone the advancement of SB 562,” they said, referring to the scrapped single-payer health care bill. “While it is appropriate for persons of varying views to express concern, disapproval or disfavor about the delay, it is never acceptable to engage in those tactics.”
Dems living in California really think that money grows on trees. Or that tax payers in other states should pay for their healthcare because they are better than anyone else.
You cannot acquire that many nuts and groups from the identity politics brainwashing and not have t hem eat each other.
Radical blacks
Muslims
LGBTQ
Feminazis
Mexicans/illegals
With the white liberal savior among them.
Those group of blacks don't like whites, gays or Latinos/Hispanics/Mexicans
Mexicans/Hispanics/Latinos/illegals don't like blacks (most are Catholic so prolly not Muslims either
Muslims don't like LGBT, feminists or anyone that's not Muslim
And all of them have been told to hate whites so how do they not turn on them as well?
FACT CHECK: Did Paul Ryan Ban Sleeveless Dresses On Capitol Hill?
A female reporter was recently denied entry into the House Speaker’s lobby on Capitol Hill for wearing a sleeveless dress. A flurry of headlines and tweets that followed decried the House’s “new” prohibitive dress code policy for women.
Verdict: False
The House has always maintained a strict formal dress code for men and women. The claim that either the House or Republican House Speaker Paul Ryan recently instituted a “new” dress code prohibiting sleeveless dresses for women is false.
Arguing with sheep about the Clinton Foundation on twitter. Incredible the mental gymnastics they play to excuse all of that.
Yeah, donations rapidly dropping off after 11/8/16 is just a total coincidence.
No one has had more excuses made for them than Hillary. There's so many that I can't even begin to cover all of them yet people fall over themselves to back a woman who achieved absolutely nothing in her entire life. Didn't achieve one damn thing in politics other than getting rich.
She got a pass for the Bosnia sniper thing
Got a pass for lying about Benghazi motive when the victims' families and her own email showed she lied.
Got a pass for Boeing deal, uranium, deal, Haiti, etc, etc
Why on earth would a foreign government and Saudis give money without the expectation of something in return?
Yeah, donations rapidly dropping off after 11/8/16 is just a total coincidence.
No one has had more excuses made for them than Hillary. There's so many that I can't even begin to cover all of them yet people fall over themselves to back a woman who achieved absolutely nothing in her entire life. Didn't achieve one damn thing in politics other than getting rich.
She got a pass for the Bosnia sniper thing
Got a pass for lying about Benghazi motive when the victims' families and her own email showed she lied.
Got a pass for Boeing deal, uranium, deal, Haiti, etc, etc
Why on earth would a foreign government and Saudis give money without the expectation of something in return?
CNN hired top al-Qaeda propagandist for award-winning Syria documentary and wants to cover its tracks
On June 16, an American media activist living in rebel-held Syrian territory sat down before a camera to vent his frustration with a former employer. Bilal Abdul Kareem described how he and his online outlet, On the Ground News, had been contracted by CNN to film the documentary Undercover in Syria.
“This was with CNN and their correspondent Clarissa Ward, which I have big-time respect for, big-time respect as a journalist, as a person,” Abdul Kareem remarked.
With a sardonic grin, Abdul Kareem described how he was slighted: “This Undercover in Syria, you can Google it — it won the prestigious Peabody Award, and it won the prestigious Overseas Press Club Award, which are basically the highest awards in journalism for international reporting. Now, [CNN] barely mentioned my name! I’m telling you, somehow CNN must have forgotten that I was the one that filmed it, I guess they forgot that.”
Indeed, Abdul Kareem’s name was a mere footnote in the Peabody Awards press release on its honoring of CNN. The organization praised Clarissa Ward for “[going] undercover into northern Syria to document Russian influence on the fighting and to navigate the ongoing devastation,” but credited Abdul Kareem only in small print, despite the fact that he was responsible for providing CNN with its on-the-ground footage.
At the April 2017 ceremony where the network’s Undercover in Syria won the Overseas Press Club Award, CNN president Jeff Zucker was on hand to deliver the keynote address. CNN later touted the award in a press release that celebrated the access Ward was granted to eastern Aleppo by the Islamist insurgents that had controlled it. The network noted that her work resulted in her being invited to testify before the United Nations Security Council. But CNN made no mention of Abdul Kareem’s role in the special.
Contrary to Abdul Kareem’s claim that CNN had simply “forgotten” him, the network may have had reason to airbrush him out of its public relations material. The man Ward contracted to take her into rebel-controlled territory was well established as one of the top English-language propagandists for al-Qaeda’s Syrian affiliate, Jabhat al-Nusra, along with other extremist groups fighting the Syrian government.
In fact, the Saudi Arabian news outlet Al Arabiya reported on June 7 that Abdul Kareem officially joined al-Nusra in 2012.
Abdul Kareem denied this accusation in a Facebook video response. “I am not, nor have I ever been, nor do I need to be a part of al-Qaeda. I don’t have any need for that,” he said, noting that he is considering legal action against Al Arabiya for its report.
However, one of Abdul Kareem’s closest colleagues has also been accused of membership in Syria’s al-Qaeda franchise. Akif Razaq, an employee of Abdul Kareem’s online media group, On the Ground News, was recently stripped of British citizenship for his alleged involvement with al-Nusra. A notice presented by British authorities to Razaq’s family in Birmingham accused him of being “aligned with an al-Qaeda affiliated group” and declared that he “presents a threat to the national security of the United Kingdom.”
On June 16, an American media activist living in rebel-held Syrian territory sat down before a camera to vent his frustration with a former employer. Bilal Abdul Kareem described how he and his online outlet, On the Ground News, had been contracted by CNN to film the documentary Undercover in Syria.
“This was with CNN and their correspondent Clarissa Ward, which I have big-time respect for, big-time respect as a journalist, as a person,” Abdul Kareem remarked.
With a sardonic grin, Abdul Kareem described how he was slighted: “This Undercover in Syria, you can Google it — it won the prestigious Peabody Award, and it won the prestigious Overseas Press Club Award, which are basically the highest awards in journalism for international reporting. Now, [CNN] barely mentioned my name! I’m telling you, somehow CNN must have forgotten that I was the one that filmed it, I guess they forgot that.”
Indeed, Abdul Kareem’s name was a mere footnote in the Peabody Awards press release on its honoring of CNN. The organization praised Clarissa Ward for “[going] undercover into northern Syria to document Russian influence on the fighting and to navigate the ongoing devastation,” but credited Abdul Kareem only in small print, despite the fact that he was responsible for providing CNN with its on-the-ground footage.
At the April 2017 ceremony where the network’s Undercover in Syria won the Overseas Press Club Award, CNN president Jeff Zucker was on hand to deliver the keynote address. CNN later touted the award in a press release that celebrated the access Ward was granted to eastern Aleppo by the Islamist insurgents that had controlled it. The network noted that her work resulted in her being invited to testify before the United Nations Security Council. But CNN made no mention of Abdul Kareem’s role in the special.
Contrary to Abdul Kareem’s claim that CNN had simply “forgotten” him, the network may have had reason to airbrush him out of its public relations material. The man Ward contracted to take her into rebel-controlled territory was well established as one of the top English-language propagandists for al-Qaeda’s Syrian affiliate, Jabhat al-Nusra, along with other extremist groups fighting the Syrian government.
In fact, the Saudi Arabian news outlet Al Arabiya reported on June 7 that Abdul Kareem officially joined al-Nusra in 2012.
Abdul Kareem denied this accusation in a Facebook video response. “I am not, nor have I ever been, nor do I need to be a part of al-Qaeda. I don’t have any need for that,” he said, noting that he is considering legal action against Al Arabiya for its report.
However, one of Abdul Kareem’s closest colleagues has also been accused of membership in Syria’s al-Qaeda franchise. Akif Razaq, an employee of Abdul Kareem’s online media group, On the Ground News, was recently stripped of British citizenship for his alleged involvement with al-Nusra. A notice presented by British authorities to Razaq’s family in Birmingham accused him of being “aligned with an al-Qaeda affiliated group” and declared that he “presents a threat to the national security of the United Kingdom.”
I'm disappointed in the GOP health care bill.
Not a single small child or granny is tossed over a cliff.
Do better, GOP.
Not a single small child or granny is tossed over a cliff.
Do better, GOP.
